ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03477942Updated Oct 5, 2026

Impact of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Osteoarthritis

A Phase 1 interventional study of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Musculoskeletal Pain, Knee Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Injury, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 5, 2026Now CompletedGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 155 studies in Musculoskeletal Pain with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 37 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Musculoskeletal Pain · United States.

Enrollment
121st of 136
16 · median 60
Started
2018
with 11 others
Phase 1
5 of 155
1 open now
Registered
45th of 155
by date

Among the 155 studies in Musculoskeletal Pain with a site in United States, this one is the 121st largest by enrollment of the 136 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 12 that started in 2018, is one of 5 in phase 1, and was the 45th registered.

Musculoskeletal Pain

516 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain; 128 are open to participants now.

Browse Musculoskeletal Pain studies →

Open to participants now

29 of the 155 studies in Musculoskeletal Pain with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

24 more — sign in →

All 29 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 66 Musculoskeletal Pain studies recruiting now, 29 (44%) set no upper age limit and 31 (47%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 18 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 60 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 155 studies in Musculoskeletal Pain with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Many patients with osteoarthritis of the knee fail non-operative measures and elect to have knee arthroplasty to improve their quality of life. If successful, intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injections into the knee may offer another viable non-operative treatment modality. Additionally, this modality may have reparative or regenerative potential, which could lead to the first treatment for osteoarthritis that treats the underlying disease as opposed to symptomatic control.

Additionally, there are no acceptable non-surgical treatments for focal chondral defects of the knee. Surgical treatments that do exist have diminished outcomes if performed on patients older than age 30-40 years. If successful, intra-articular MSC injections into the knee would represent the first non-operative treatment for focal chondral defects and also represent a potential option for treatment in patients over the age of 30-40 years.

This trial will be a prospective, single-center phase I pilot study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single intra-articular injection of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs in 16 subjects, 8 who have knee osteoarthritis and 8 who have a focal chondral defect in the knee. Patients will undergo a bone marrow harvest procedure at the Dahms Clinical Research Unit (DCRU) of University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. MSCs will be isolated and expanded. After approximately 2-3 weeks, patients will return for an intra-articular injection of 50x106 MSCs Subsequent study visits will occur on post-injection day 7 and months 2, 6, 12, and 24. Safety of intra-articular injection of MSCs will be evaluated at study visits by interval history, physical examination and assessment of any adverse events that are observed/reported. Additionally, efficacy will be evaluated by having patients complete functional outcome measures including: Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and Lysholm Knee Scale. These will be completed at the pre-treatment visit and then repeated at the 2, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up visits. Lastly, T1 rho and T2 mapping on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be used to assess for improved cartilage quality after intra-articular injection of MSCs. An MRI will be obtained at the pre-treatment visit. At the 12 and 24 month follow up visit, additional MRIs will be obtained and analyzed to compare the pre-treatment MRI to post-treatment MRIs.

03

Conditions studied

  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Cartilage Injury
  • Cartilage Degeneration
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Knee Osteoarthritis Subjects

  1. Male or female 18-60 years of age
  2. Confirmed diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis based on clinical and radiographic findings
  3. Unilateral chronic knee pain >4 months
  4. Imaging findings consistent with mild-moderate generalized cartilage degeneration (MRI chondropathy or radiographic changes)
  5. Failed non-invasive modalities of treatment
  6. Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written document
  7. For women of : agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use a method with a failure rate of \<1% per year during the treatment period. A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is postmenarcheal, has not reached a state (\<12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and has not undergone surgical sterilization (removal of ovaries and/or uterus). Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of \<1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, hormonal contraceptive that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices. The reliability of sexual abstinence should be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Period abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception

Focal Chondral Defect Subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female 18-60 year of age
  2. Knee pain and/or effusion
  3. Inability to continue or difficulty in participation in recreational or professional sport
  4. MRI with Outerbridge Grade 4 focal chondral defect
  5. Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  6. For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use a contraceptive method with a failure rate of \<1% per year during the treatment period. A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is postmenarcheal, has not reached a postmenopausal state (\<12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and has not undergone surgical sterilization (removal of ovaries and/or uterus). Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of \<1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, hormonal contraceptive that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices. The reliability of sexual abstinence should be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Period abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Radiographic findings consistent with Kellgren-Lawrence Stage 4 disease
  2. Focal chondral defect
  3. Major axial deviation (>5 degrees varus or valgus)
  4. Concomitant ligamentous or meniscal injury
  5. > 40 as defined by NIH Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index
  6. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study
  7. Concurrent participation in another trial involving systemic administration of agents (within the previous 30 days), or have received prior intra-articular injection of any form

    • Or plans to participate in any other allogeneic stem cell therapy trial during the 2-year follow-up period
  8. Symptomatic active cardiac or respiratory disease that requires scheduled use of medication
  9. Neurologic disorder including, but not limited to epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, tumor of the nervous system, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
  10. Psychiatric disorder including, but not limited to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, depression, anxiety, or any other mental illness that would prevent the completion of the study
  11. Current from medication or disease
  12. History of systemic
  13. History of infection with , C, or
  14. History of inflammatory arthropathy
  15. History of prior local knee infection
  16. Major surgeries, other than diagnostic surgery within 4 weeks
  17. to MRI:

    • Indwelling medical devices such as pacemakers, aneurysm clips, etc.
    • Indwelling metal from any other cause (trauma, etc.). To be excluded with history and/or radiographs, as necessary
  18. Screening hematology with white blood cell count \< 4.5 x 109 cells/L, hematocrit \<30%, and \<150 x 109 platelets/L
  19. Have a known history of or anaphylactic reaction to Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
  20. Have been treated in the last 6 months before enrollment for alcohol and/or drug abuse in an inpatient substance abuse program
  21. Subject unlikely to complete the study as determined by the Investigator
  22. Subjects must have normal marrow function, and be clinically stable with no significant changes in health status within 2 weeks prior to cell collection that the PI/Sub-Investigator deems relevant to exclude from participation. (See below for details of the cell collection procedure)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteoarthritis

    The OA subgroup will be patients aged 18-60 years who have chronic knee pain due to early OA that have not responded to conservative, non-invasive measures such as physical therapy, medications, and activity modification.

    Biological: Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells

  • Experimental
    Cartilage

    The focal chondral defect subgroup will be patients aged 18-60 years who participate in recreational or professional sports and are symptomatic from a focal chondral defect shown on MRI.

    Biological: Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Interventions

  • Bone marrow will be harvested from each individual patient's iliac crest, followed by stem cell isolation, expansion and preparation. Stem cell will be injected approximately 3-4 weeks after bone marrow harvest, injecting 50x10\^6 MSCs in the knee via a medial parapatellar approach under sterile technique in 8 patients with generalized knee OA or focal chondral defects.

    Also known as: Stem Cell Injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Endpoint: Incidence of treatment emergent major adverse events directly related to MSC injection

    Establish the safety and tolerability of expended autologous intraarticular MSC injections into the knee by the incidence of no major adverse events (AE) determined to be directly related to MSC injection by the end of the 24 month follow up period. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence during the clinical investigation in a patient administered stem cells that does not have a causal relationship with the treatment that occurs from the time of consent through the last clinic visit at 24 months post-injection. An AE is therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the administration of the investigational product, whether or not related to that investigational product. AEs will be described by duration (start and stop dates and times), severity, outcome, treatment and relation to investigational product, or if unrelated, the cause.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Endpoint: Development of Pain following injection based on Visual Analog Scale scoring.

    Pain will be analyzed based on visual analog pain scores (VAS) by clinically and statistically significant amounts by six-month follow up and maintain these improvements throughout the two-year study period. Data analysis will be performed separately on the knee osteoarthritis subgroup and on the focal chondral defect subgroup. This will consist of a comparison of mean values for VAS scoring scales pre-operatively and at follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24-months. Clinically significant outcomes will be determined based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) occurring for each respective scale, which is defined as the smallest change score needed for the effect to be considered clinically relevant; described below. Specifically, VAS represents a patient-reported measurement tool used to quantify perceived level of pain, graded on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worse pain possible.

    Time frame: 2, 6, 12 and 24 months

  2. Secondary Endpoint: Clinical Evaluation of Injection based on functional outcomes scoring using KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scoring scales.

    Functional outcomes will be evaluated clinically and statistically throughout the study period. Data analysis will be performed on the knee osteoarthritis and the focal chondral defect subgroups. Mean values for Knee Injury and Osteoathritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), and Lysholm scoring scales pre-operatively and at follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24-months will be compared. KOOS is a qualitative assessment of knee pain, stiffness, function, and quality of life within the last week. The IKDC is a quantitative assessment of knee symptoms with daily and sporting activities with a high score of 100 representing no limitations or pain, with lower scores signifying pain or limitations in knee function. The Lysholm score rates knee pain and symptoms with a high score of 100, with scores \> 90 representing excellent function and scores \<65 representing poor function.

    Time frame: 2, 6, 12 and 24 months

  3. Secondary Endpoint: Reparative potential of intra-articular MSCs based on improvement in cartilage quality using MRI.

    T1 rho and T2 mapping observed from MRIs at 1-year and 2-year follow-up to determine the reparative potential of intra-articular MSCs. T1 rho values increase as degenerative changes worsen; therefore, as cartilage quality improves, it is expected that T1 rho values would increase. T2 mapping values primarily reflect changes in water content and collagen anisotropy. Focal areas of increased T2 mapping values correlate with focal areas of cartilage damage; therefore, as cartilage quality improves, T2 mapping values would decrease. Clinically significant changes will be observed by comparing T1 rho and T2 values in areas of relatively preserved hyaline cartilage within our patients with the areas of degenerative change to utilize an internal control. Data analysis will consist of a comparison of mean values for quantitative T1 rho and T2 mapping data pre-operatively and at follow-up visits at 12 and 24-months.

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G, Jordan JM. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1002/art.24021. PubMed 18759314 ↗
  • Sato M, Uchida K, Nakajima H, Miyazaki T, Guerrero AR, Watanabe S, Roberts S, Baba H. Direct transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells into the knee joints of Hartley strain guinea pigs with spontaneous osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Feb 7;14(1):R31. doi: 10.1186/ar3735. PubMed 22314040 ↗
  • Centeno CJ, Busse D, Kisiday J, Keohan C, Freeman M, Karli D. Increased knee cartilage volume in degenerative joint disease using percutaneously implanted, autologous mesenchymal stem cells. Pain Physician. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):343-53. PubMed 18523506 ↗
  • Davatchi F, Abdollahi BS, Mohyeddin M, Shahram F, Nikbin B. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Preliminary report of four patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011 May;14(2):211-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01599.x. Epub 2011 Mar 4. PubMed 21518322 ↗
  • Emadedin M, Aghdami N, Taghiyar L, Fazeli R, Moghadasali R, Jahangir S, Farjad R, Baghaban Eslaminejad M. Intra-articular injection of autologous mesenchymal stem cells in six patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Iran Med. 2012 Jul;15(7):422-8. PubMed 22724879 ↗
  • Vega A, Martin-Ferrero MA, Del Canto F, Alberca M, Garcia V, Munar A, Orozco L, Soler R, Fuertes JJ, Huguet M, Sanchez A, Garcia-Sancho J. Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation. 2015 Aug;99(8):1681-90. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000678. PubMed 25822648 ↗
  • Koh YG, Jo SB, Kwon OR, Suh DS, Lee SW, Park SH, Choi YJ. Mesenchymal stem cell injections improve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2013 Apr;29(4):748-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.017. Epub 2013 Jan 29. PubMed 23375182 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No patient protected health information will be shared outside the primary research team. All patient data will be de-identified.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 93 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 22, 2018
First posted
Mar 27, 2018
StartActual
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03477942
Responsible party
James E Voos, MD (Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026
Completion
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

James E Voos, MD
principal investigator · University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Stem Cell

Start the discussion