CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06870162Updated Aug 21, 2026

Pain Disengagement Training (Open Pilot)

An interventional study of Pain Disengagement Training in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to conduct an open pilot trial to determine the initial feasibility of a self-directed writing-based intervention in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain and elevated pain catastrophizing. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the treatment, credibility and participant satisfaction, treatment adherence, and feasibility of assessments following pre-specified benchmarks.

Read the detailed description

Mind-body interventions are some of the most effective treatments for chronic pain, yet due to lack of resources, many are inaccessible to the patients who need them. The investigators seek to fill this gap by developing and testing Pain Disengagement Training (PDT) for the treatment of chronic pain catastrophizing, a key risk factor for pain interference. The investigators will administer the PDT treatment in a small number (approximately 10) of participants to evaluate initial benchmarks (the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the treatment, credibility and participant satisfaction, treatment adherence, and feasibility of assessments) and to assess participants' experience with the intervention using qualitative exit interviews. Results will inform the refinement of the intervention for a future larger trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Keywords

  • pain catastrophizing
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Outpatient adults (i.e., greater than or equal to 18)
  2. Has self reported chronic musculoskeletal pain (i.e., pain persisting for at least 3 months)
  3. Pain score greater than or equal to 4 (moderate) on the Numerical Rating Scale
  4. Pain catastrophizing score greater than or equal to 20 on Pain Catastrophizing Scale
  5. Willingness to engage in a writing-based intervention and self-reported ability to write or type for at least 30 minutes in a sitting
  6. Received care at Massachusetts General Hospital
  7. English verbal and writing fluency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically significant change in therapy or medication in the past 3 months
  2. Severe untreated mental health condition (e.g., psychosis)
  3. Active suicidality with history of plan or current intent
  4. Serious illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months (e.g., cancer)
  5. Untreated substance use problem that, per patient's self-report, would interfere with the ability to complete the intervention.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pain Disengagement Training

    The intervention involves approximately 8 sessions. The first session will involve a psychoeducation component describing the association between negative emotions and pain and the rationale for the intervention strategies. The intervention sessions will consist of approximately 30 minutes of writing alternating between imaginal exposure writing and positive writing periods alternating back and forth (e.g., 3-5 minutes of imaginal exposure writing followed by 3-5 minutes of positive writing before returning to imaginal exposure writing, etc.). Exposure writing will involve writing about a pain-related catastrophic worry repeatedly until it becomes less anxiety-provoking. The positive writing topics will change with each prompt and will be structured by session theme (e.g., values/goals, meaningful activities). They will also complete between session practice by setting aside a time for worrying and then completing a meaningful activity.

    Behavioral: Pain Disengagement Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralPain Disengagement Training

    The intervention involves approximately 8 sessions. The first session will involve a psychoeducation component describing the association between negative emotions and pain and the rationale for the intervention strategies. The intervention sessions will consist of approximately 30 minutes of writing alternating between imaginal exposure writing and positive writing periods alternating back and forth (e.g., 3-5 minutes of imaginal exposure writing followed by 3-5 minutes of positive writing before returning to imaginal exposure writing, etc.). Exposure writing will involve writing about a pain-related catastrophic worry repeatedly until it becomes less anxiety-provoking. The positive writing topics will change with each prompt and will be structured by session theme (e.g., values/goals, meaningful activities). They will also complete between session practice by setting aside a time for worrying and then completing a meaningful activity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of recruitment

    \>70% participants approached agree to participate in the intervention

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  2. Acceptability of treatment

    \>70% of participants attend at least 6 out of 8 sessions

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  3. Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire

    Measures perception that the treatment is credible and will offer improvements. Credibility (4 items) is rated from 1-9 with higher scores indicating more credibility. Expectancy is rated from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater expectancy of improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Measure of client satisfaction with a program or intervention. 8-item scale measured from 1 to 4 with greater scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Post-test (6 weeks)

  5. Adherence to intervention

    Percent of writing sections demonstrate correct themes (e.g., anxiety words in imaginal exposure writing)

    Time frame: Mid-intervention

  6. Feasibility of assessments

    \>70% of participants have no measures fully missing

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale

    Rating of pain intensity on a 0-10 1-item scale with greater scores indicating greater pain intensity

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  2. Graded Chronic Pain Scale

    Measure of pain severity. 3-item scale rated from 0 to 10 with greater scores indicating greater pain severity and interference

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  3. PROMIS Pain Interference scale

    Assesses pain interference in the past 7 days in activities, work, chores, etc. 8-item scale (1 - not at all to 5 - very much) with greater scores indicating greater pain interference.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  4. Brief Pain Inventory

    Assesses pain intensity (4 items) on a 0 to 10 scale with greater scores indicating worse pain intensity and interference.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire - 9

    Measure of depressive symptoms. 9-item scale rated from 0 to 3 with greater scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  6. PROMIS depression scale-8

    Measure of depressive symptoms. 8-item scale rated from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  7. Penn State Worry Questionnaire - abbreviated

    8-item measure of worry rated from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater worry.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  8. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    Assesses magnification, helplessness, and rumination in response to pain. 13-item scale rated 0 to 4 with greater scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  9. Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale - Short Form (PASS-20)

    Assesses fear and anxiety in response to pain. 20-item scale rated 0 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater pain anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  10. Worry Disengagement Questionnaire

    Measures ability to shift attention from worry. 4-item scale rated from 0 to 10 with greater scores indicating greater ability to shift attention away from worry.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  11. Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale - Short Form

    Assesses engagement in meaningful activities. 9-item measure rated from 0 to 6 with greater scores indicating greater activity engagement.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  12. Positive emotion rating scale

    Assesses level of emotional intensity on a 4-item scale from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating more positive emotionality.

    Time frame: Mid-intervention

  13. Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire-General Emotion and Worry subscales

    Measures ability to sustain negative emotionality to protect against sudden shifts in emotion. 25-item scale rated from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater avoidance of contrasting emotional states.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6 weeks)

  14. PROMIS meaning and purpose scale short form 4a

    4 item scale assessing meaning and fulfillment in life (1 to 5 rating scale)

    Time frame: Baseline, post-test (6-weeks)

  15. Self-Compassion Scale

    12 item 1 to 5 scale measuring self-compassion

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-test (6 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    • Katherine McDermott, PhD · Contact · kmcdermott@mgh.harvard.edu · (617) 643-4208
    • Katherine McDermott, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified data will include feasibility assessments, intervention measures (i.e., peak emotion during writing periods) and pre and post intervention self-report questionnaires in the open pilot.

Supporting information: Sap, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06870162
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Responsible party
Katherine A McDermott (Staff psychologist, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2025
Start date
Oct 14, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Katherine McDermott, PhD
Contact
kmcdermott@mgh.harvard.edu
(617) 643-4208
Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD
Contact
avranceanu@mgh.harvard.edu
Katherine McDermott, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion