ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03476707Updated Sep 24, 2024Results posted

Association of Anemia With Hospital Costs in Elective Colorectal Surgery

An observational study in Surgery, Surgical Blood Loss and Anemia, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-24.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
851
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective is to measure the adjusted association between preoperative anemia and total hospital costs. We hypothesize that patients with anemia before surgery will have higher hospitalization costs than people without anemia.

Read the detailed description

This study will examine the association between preoperative anemia (hematocrit less than 0.39; low blood counts) and hospital total costs from elective colorectal surgery. Total costs will be defined as the combination of direct and indirect costs ascertained using standardized patient-level costing algorithms (i.e. the standard way that hospital measure their costs). Adjustment will be made for factors that are likely to influence both the presence of anemia and costs of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgery
  • Surgical Blood Loss
  • Anemia
  • Colon Cancer
  • Economic Problems
03

In context

Blood Loss, Surgical

213 studies on the registry are indexed under Blood Loss, Surgical; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 851 is above the median of 154 across 43 observational studies indexed under Blood Loss, Surgical.

Browse Blood Loss, Surgical studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All adults having elective colorectal surgery with national surgical quality improvement program data available

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective hospital admission
  • having colorectal surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not enrolled in national surgical quality improvement program data collection
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
851 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Anemic

    People with a preoperative hematocrit less than 0.39

    Other: Anemia

  • Non-anemic

    People with a preoperative hematocrit greater than or equal to 0.39

Interventions

  • OtherAnemia

    Hematocrit less than 0.39

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Hospital Costs

    Direct and indirect costs accrued during the index hospitalization. Costs were measured using standard and validated algorithms, standardized to 2016 CAD. This method accounts for a patient's resource intensity weight, their case mix group, as well as fixed patient costs (e.g., medications, investigations) and indirect costs to the hospital based on patient's location of care (intensive care unit versus ward) and length of stay.

    Time frame: Hospital admission to date of discharge from hospital, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay

    Number of days in hospital after surgery

    Time frame: Date of surgery to date of hospital discharge, or up to one year after surgery (whichever comes first)

  2. Red Blood Cell Transfusion

    Any red blood cell transfusion received

    Time frame: Hospital admission to date of surgery, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first

07

Results

Posted Sep 24, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Findings may not be generalizable to other jurisdictions with different hospital funding models and findings provide only an association between anemia and costs. There is risk of confounding bias due to unmeasured variables that might influence the presence of anemia or the accumulation of costs. The lack of integration of transfusion costs in our healthcare system required us to estimate the added cost of transfusions, and we were also unable to account for physician remuneration costs.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAnemicNon-anemic
Started381470
Completed381470
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Hospital Costs

Direct and indirect costs accrued during the index hospitalization. Costs were measured using standard and validated algorithms, standardized to 2016 CAD. This method accounts for a patient's resource intensity weight, their case mix group, as well as fixed patient costs (e.g., medications, investigations) and indirect costs to the hospital based on patient's location of care (intensive care unit versus ward) and length of stay.

Time frame:
Hospital admission to date of discharge from hospital, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first
Reported as:
Mean · Dollars
Total Hospital Costs
DollarsAnemicNon-anemic
Total Hospital Costs23,667 ± 32,21017,100 ± 10,822
SecondaryLength of Stay

Number of days in hospital after surgery

Time frame:
Date of surgery to date of hospital discharge, or up to one year after surgery (whichever comes first)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Length of Stay
DaysAnemicNon-anemic
Length of Stay12.4 ± 17.58.5 ± 7.5
SecondaryRed Blood Cell Transfusion

Any red blood cell transfusion received

Time frame:
Hospital admission to date of surgery, or 365 days after admission, whichever came first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Red Blood Cell Transfusion
ParticipantsAnemicNon-anemic
Red Blood Cell Transfusion8818

Adverse events

Collected over AEs were not collected. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Anemic———
Non-anemic———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
Age — < 65123272395
Age — 65-74105117222
Age — 75-8411467181
Age — >84391453
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
Female214181395
Male167289456
Independent Functional Status
Independent Functional Status(Participants)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
Count of participants353467820
Elixhauser comorbidity index
Elixhauser comorbidity index(Index)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
Mean6.16 ± 5.985.50 ± 5.896 ± 6
Procedural Index for Mortality Risk (PIMR) Score
Procedural Index for Mortality Risk (PIMR) Score(Number of procedural risk points)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
Mean0.47 ± 1.390.17 ± 0.700.3 ± 1.1
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Score
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Score(Participants)AnemicNon-anemicTotal
I-II51142193
III260302562
IV-V702696
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Feng S, Greenberg J, Moloo H, Thavorn K, McIsaac DI. Hospital cost associated with anemia in elective colorectal surgery: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;66(8):877-885. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01379-8. Epub 2019 May 1. PubMed 31044414 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2010 to primary completion in Dec 2016, 83 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2024, 7 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 23 observational studies under Blood Loss, Surgical, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 60. This study's 83 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 19, 2018
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
StartActual
Jan 2010
Primary completionActual
Dec 2016
CompletionActual
Mar 2018
Results first posted
Sep 24, 2024
Last update
Sep 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03476707
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Mar 2018
Results posted
Sep 24, 2024
Last update
Sep 24, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion