ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03463031GSP 301-305Updated Oct 8, 2019Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in Children (Aged 6 to Under 12 Years) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

A Phase 3 interventional study of GSP 301 NS and GSP 301 Placebo NS in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR), sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A.. Completed at 32 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-08.

Sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
446
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal · United States.

Enrollment
51st of 101
446 · median 446
Started
2018
with 2 others
Phase 3
47 of 107
none open now
Registered
100th of 107
by date

Among the 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States, this one is the 51st largest by enrollment of the 101 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 47 in phase 3, and was the 100th registered.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; 24 are open to participants now.

Browse Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 17 Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies recruiting now, 2 (12%) set no upper age limit and 15 (88%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 takes children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Years to 11 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).

03

Conditions studied

  • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

Keywords

  • GSP 301 nasal spray for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female subjects aged ≥6 to \<12 years
  2. Clinical history of SAR (at least 2 years) with exacerbations during the study season for the relevant seasonal allergen (e.g., tree/grass pollen)
  3. Demonstrated sensitivity to at least 1 seasonal allergen through positive skin prick test within 12 months prior to screening
  4. A 12-hour rTNSS value ≥6 out of a possible 12 for the morning assessment at screening
  5. Signed /assent form (subject and parent/caregiver/legal guardian)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females of or pregnant
  2. Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the site for 24 hours or longer during the last 7 days of the run-in period.
  3. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing
  4. History and evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent post nasal drip
  5. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
  6. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
446 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GSP 301 NS

    Fixed dose combination of olopatadine hydrochloride 665 μg and mometasone furoate 25 μg NS

    Drug: GSP 301 NS

  • Placebo comparator
    GSP 301 Placebo NS

    GSP 301 Placebo nasal spray

    Drug: GSP 301 Placebo NS

Interventions

  • 1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

  • DrugGSP 301 Placebo NS

    1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score ( rTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period

    The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was assessed by 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate, causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). Each of these four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching) of the rTNSS is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The four nasal symptoms of the rTNSS is summed. The total score of the rTNSS ranged from 0 to 12.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.

    The instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) was assessed by instantaneous (ie, an evaluation of the symptom severity just before taking study medication \[within 10 minutes\]) of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate, causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). Each of these four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching) of the iTNSS is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The four nasal symptoms of the iTNSS is summed. The total score of the iTNSS ranged from 0 to 12.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 14

  2. Change From Baseline in the Overall Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score on Day 15 (Visit 4)

    The PRQLQ is a validated, disease-specific, quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire developed to measure the physical, emotional, and social impairments that are experienced by children (aged ≥6 to \<12 years) with rhinoconjunctivitis. The PRQLQ has 23 questions in 5 domains (nose symptoms, eye symptoms, practical problems, activity limitation and other symptoms). Subjects recall how they have been during the previous week and respond to each question on a 7-point scale with scores ranging from 6 (extremely bothered), 5 (very bothered), 4 (quite bothered), 3 (somewhat bothered), 2 (bothered a bit), 1 (hardly bothered at all), 0 (not bothered). The Overall PRQLQ score is the mean of all 23 subject-reported responses. The Overall PRQLQ score range from 0 to 6 where 0 represents no impairment and 6 represents maximum impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 15

  3. Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.

    The Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) will be calculated using the 3 eye-related non-nasal symptoms: itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes. The subject will assess and report his/her non-nasal symptoms twice (AM and PM assessments). Scores ranged from 0 (No sign/symptom evident), 1 (Sign/symptom clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 (Definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 (Sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) ranged from 0 to 9.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 14

07

Results

Posted Oct 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Started225221
Completed215216
Not completed105
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject42
Withdrew: Investigator/sponsor decision01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Adverse event41
Withdrew: Use of prohibited medication by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score ( rTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period

The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was assessed by 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate, causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). Each of these four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching) of the rTNSS is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The four nasal symptoms of the rTNSS is summed. The total score of the rTNSS ranged from 0 to 12.

Time frame:
Baseline and day 14
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score ( rTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period
units on a scaleGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Baseline8.83 ± 1.418.84 ± 1.66
Mean Change from baseline to end of treatment-2.2 ± 0.17-1.6 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 NS vs Placebo NS · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 · Least square mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.

The instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) was assessed by instantaneous (ie, an evaluation of the symptom severity just before taking study medication \[within 10 minutes\]) of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate, causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). Each of these four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching) of the iTNSS is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The four nasal symptoms of the iTNSS is summed. The total score of the iTNSS ranged from 0 to 12.

Time frame:
Baseline and day 14
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.
units on a scaleGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Baseline7.89 ± 1.937.82 ± 2.04
Mean Change from baseline to end of treatment-1.8 ± 0.17-1.1 ± 0.17
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 NS vs Placebo NS · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Least square mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.0 to -0.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Overall Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score on Day 15 (Visit 4)

The PRQLQ is a validated, disease-specific, quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire developed to measure the physical, emotional, and social impairments that are experienced by children (aged ≥6 to \<12 years) with rhinoconjunctivitis. The PRQLQ has 23 questions in 5 domains (nose symptoms, eye symptoms, practical problems, activity limitation and other symptoms). Subjects recall how they have been during the previous week and respond to each question on a 7-point scale with scores ranging from 6 (extremely bothered), 5 (very bothered), 4 (quite bothered), 3 (somewhat bothered), 2 (bothered a bit), 1 (hardly bothered at all), 0 (not bothered). The Overall PRQLQ score is the mean of all 23 subject-reported responses. The Overall PRQLQ score range from 0 to 6 where 0 represents no impairment and 6 represents maximum impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline and day 15
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Overall Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score on Day 15 (Visit 4)
units on a scaleGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Baseline2.51 ± 1.0782.42 ± 1.001
Mean Change from baseline to end of treatment-0.8 ± 0.08-0.5 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 NS vs Placebo NS · ANCOVA · p = < 0.001 · Least square mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.

The Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) will be calculated using the 3 eye-related non-nasal symptoms: itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes. The subject will assess and report his/her non-nasal symptoms twice (AM and PM assessments). Scores ranged from 0 (No sign/symptom evident), 1 (Sign/symptom clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 (Definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 (Sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). The Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) ranged from 0 to 9.

Time frame:
Baseline and day 14
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) Over the 14-day Treatment Period.
units on a scaleGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Baseline3.84 ± 2.453.59 ± 2.52
Mean Change from baseline to end of treatment-0.8 ± 0.14-0.6 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 NS vs Placebo NS · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.233 · Least square mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.1

Adverse events

Collected over AEs and SAEs were collected from the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF) until the follow up contact which was approximately 22 days and up to 27 days with 7 to 10 days of a placebo run-in period and 14 days of treatment period, with allowable window periods for the study visits.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GSP 301 NS0/225 (0%)0/225 (0%)0/225 (0%)
Placebo NS0/221 (0%)1/221 (0.5%)0/221 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGSP 301 NSPlacebo NS
Meningitis viralInfections and infestations0/2251/221

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GSP 301 NSPlacebo NSTotal
Mean8.7 ± 1.68.6 ± 1.78.7 ± 1.7
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)GSP 301 NSPlacebo NSTotal
6 - < 910099199
9 - < 12125122247
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GSP 301 NSPlacebo NSTotal
Female99109208
Male126112238
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GSP 301 NSPlacebo NSTotal
Hispanic or Latino6785152
Not Hispanic or Latino158135293
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GSP 301 NSPlacebo NSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian8513
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American464490
White168169337
More than one race325
Unknown or Not Reported011
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 18
    Mission Viejo, California 19406, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 32
    Ontario, California 910762, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 30
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 17
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 21
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 13
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 26
    Savannah, Georgia 31312, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 28
    Louisville, Kentucky 40215, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 14
    Baltimore, Maryland 21236-5992, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 19
    Bethesda, Maryland 20814-2672, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 25
    Ypsilanti, Michigan 48197, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 12
    Columbia, Missouri 65203, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 10
    Rolla, Missouri 65401, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 27
    Warrensburg, Missouri 64093, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 15
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 3
    High Point, North Carolina 27262-4320, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 8
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 11
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 29
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 2
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73034, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 33
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 4
    Medford, Oregon 97504-9741, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 6
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 5
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 24
    Kerrville, Texas 78028-6071, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 1
    New Braunfels, Texas 78130, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 7
    San Antonio, Texas 78229-3749, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 9
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 20
    Waco, Texas 76712, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 31
    Waco, Texas 76712, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 22
    Draper, Utah 84020, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 23
    Greenfield, Wisconsin 53288, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Prenner BM, Amar NJ, Hampel FC Jr, Caracta CF, Wu W. Efficacy and safety of GSP301 nasal spray in children aged 6 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Nov;129(5):618-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.07.029. Epub 2022 Aug 1. PubMed 35926824 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2018, 7 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2019, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 31 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, half reached primary completion within 4 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 1 and three quarters within 14. This study's 7 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 37 studies reached it within 4 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 14.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 5, 2018
First posted
Mar 13, 2018
StartActual
Mar 16, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 14, 2018
CompletionActual
Nov 14, 2018
Results first posted
Oct 8, 2019
Last update
Oct 8, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03463031
Lead sponsor
Glenmark Specialty S.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2018
Start date
Mar 16, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 14, 2018
Completion
Nov 14, 2018
Results posted
Oct 8, 2019
Last update
Oct 8, 2019

Study contacts

Sudeesh Tantry, PhD
study director · Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: GSP 301

Start the discussion