ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02870205GSP 301-304Updated Apr 6, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

A Phase 3 interventional study of GSP 301 NS and GOM-NS in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR), sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A.. Completed at 43 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-06.

Sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,176
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal · United States.

Enrollment
8th of 101
1,176 · median 446
Started
2016
with 1 other
Phase 3
47 of 107
none open now
Registered
97th of 107
by date

Among the 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 101 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2016, is one of 47 in phase 3, and was the 97th registered.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; 24 are open to participants now.

Browse Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 17 Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies recruiting now, 2 (12%) set no upper age limit and 15 (88%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 takes children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 12 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 107 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 NS compared with placebo NS and individual monotherapy formulations for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)

03

Conditions studied

  • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and non-pregnant females who are 12 years of age and older.
  • Documented clinical history of SAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit [Visit 1]) with exacerbations (clinical evidence of active symptoms) for the relevant seasonal allergen during the Fall or mountain cedar allergy seasons (e.g., ragweed or mountain cedar pollen)
  • A 12-hour rTNSS ≥8 out of a possible 12 and a congestion score ≥2 for the AM assessment at the Screening Visit (Visit 1).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing.
  • History of positive test for , or infection.
  • Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip.
  • Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
  • Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma
  • Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the site for 24 hours or longer during the last 7 days of the run-in period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,176 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GSP 301 NS

    Drug: GSP 301 NS

  • Active comparator
    GOM-NS

    Drug: GOM-NS

  • Active comparator
    GMM-2 NS

    Drug: GMM-2 NS

  • Placebo comparator
    GSP 301 placebo NS

    Drug: GSP 301 placebo NS

Interventions

  • 2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

  • DrugGOM-NS

    2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

  • DrugGMM-2 NS

    2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

  • DrugGSP 301 placebo NS

    2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

    The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was assessed by 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Symptom scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). The rTNSS was calculated as the sum of the subject-reported severity scores for nasal symptoms, and value ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 12 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate).

    Time frame: Baseline and day 14

07

Results

Posted Apr 6, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301 NSOlopatadine HCl NSMometasone Furoate NS
Started294294294294
Completed284289287287
Not completed10577

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was assessed by 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching). Symptom scores ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). The rTNSS was calculated as the sum of the subject-reported severity scores for nasal symptoms, and value ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 12 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate).

Time frame:
Baseline and day 14
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
units on a scaleGSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301 NSOlopatadine HCl NSMometasone Furoate NS
Baseline10.3 ± 1.210.1 ± 1.210.2 ± 1.310.2 ± 1.3
Change from baseline to end of treatment-2.9 ± 3.2-4.3 ± 3.1-3.6 ± 3.3-3.5 ± 3.5
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 Placebo NS vs GSP 301 NS · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (GSP 301 NS vs GSP 301 placebo NS comparison for rTNSS was tested at 0.05 significance level.)
  • GSP 301 NS vs Olopatadine HCl NS · ANCOVA · p = 0.028
  • GSP 301 NS vs Mometasone Furoate NS · ANCOVA · p = 0.019
  • GSP 301 Placebo NS vs Olopatadine HCl NS · ANCOVA · p = <0.001
  • GSP 301 Placebo NS vs Mometasone Furoate NS · ANCOVA · p = 0.002

Adverse events

Collected over The AEs and SAEs were collected from the time of signing the informed consent form until the end of study i.e., 7-10 days of screening and placebo run-in and 14 days of treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GSP 301 Placebo NS—1/294 (0.3%)0/294 (0%)
GSP 301 NS—0/294 (0%)0/294 (0%)
Olopatadine HCl NS—2/294 (0.7%)0/294 (0%)
Mometasone Furoate NS—1/293 (0.3%)0/293 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301 NSOlopatadine HCl NSMometasone Furoate NS
Peritonsillar abscessInfections and infestations0/2940/2940/2941/293
OsteomyelitisInfections and infestations1/2940/2940/2940/293
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/2940/2941/2940/293
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders0/2940/2941/2940/293
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/2940/2940/2940/293
Large intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/2940/2941/2940/293
Large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders0/2940/2941/2940/293
Foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2940/2940/2940/293

Baseline characteristics

GSP 301 placebo NS: Due to repeated participation of same subject in 2 seasons, only 1 participation (fall period) was included; Mometasone furoate NS: 1 subject received wrong kit and was excluded; GSP 301 NS and olopatadine HCl NS: Due to coinciding participation of same subject at 2 different sites, both participation's were excluded.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301 NSOlopatadine HCl NSMometasone Furoate NSTotal
Mean39.6 ± 14.9339.9 ± 14.9139.9 ± 14.6239.2 ± 14.8639.6 ± 14.81
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301 NSOlopatadine HCl NSMometasone Furoate NSTotal
Female176202189170737
Male11791104123435
08

Study locations

43 sites
  • Investigational Site 406
    Mission Viejo, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 414
    Orange, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 435
    San Diego, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 420
    Centennial, Colorado, United States
  • Investigational Site 444
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
  • Investigational Site 428
    Aventura, Florida, United States
  • Investigational Site 412
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Investigational Site 436
    Bethesda, Maryland, United States
  • Investigational Site 432
    South Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States
  • Investigational Site 426
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Investigational Site 403
    Plymouth, Minnesota, United States
  • Investigational Site 443
    Columbia, Missouri, United States
  • Investigational Site 441
    Rolla, Missouri, United States
  • Investigational Site 440
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Investigational Site 405
    Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
  • Investigational Site 434
    Skillman, New Jersey, United States
  • Investigational Site 408
    Rochester, New York, United States
  • Investigational Site 418
    Rockville Centre, New York, United States
  • Investigational Site 402
    High Point, North Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 427
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 419
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • United States 404
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • United States 407
    Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
  • Investigational Site 410
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Investigational Site 424
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
  • Investigational Site 411
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Investigational Site 416
    Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 415
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 442
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 417
    Boerne, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 421
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 430
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 431
    El Paso, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 433
    Kerrville, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 422
    New Braunfels, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 401
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 413
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 425
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 437
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 400
    Waco, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 409
    Waco, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 423
    Draper, Utah, United States
  • Investigational Site 439
    Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gross GN, Berman G, Amar NJ, Caracta CF, Tantry SK. Efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jun;122(6):630-638.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 22. PubMed 30910440 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2017, 5 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2018, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 31 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, half reached primary completion within 4 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 1 and three quarters within 14. This study's 5 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 37 studies reached it within 4 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 14.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2016
First posted
Aug 17, 2016
StartActual
Aug 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 2017
CompletionActual
Jan 2017
Results first posted
Apr 6, 2018
Last update
Apr 6, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02870205
Lead sponsor
Glenmark Specialty S.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2016
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2017
Completion
Jan 2017
Results posted
Apr 6, 2018
Last update
Apr 6, 2018

Study contacts

Sudeesh Tantry, PhD
study director · Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: GSP 301

Start the discussion