ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02709538GSP 301-303Updated Feb 26, 2020Results posted

Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)

A Phase 3 interventional study of GSP 301 NS and GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7 in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A.. Completed at 34 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-26.

Sponsored by Glenmark Specialty S.A. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
601
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 60 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial with a site in United States — none open to participants now, 1 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial · United States.

Enrollment
10th of 57
601 · median 301
Started
2016
with 1 other
Phase 3
33 of 60
none open now
Registered
58th of 60
by date

Among the 60 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial with a site in United States, this one is the 10th largest by enrollment of the 57 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2016, is one of 33 in phase 3, and was the 58th registered.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

178 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; 9 are open to participants now.

Browse Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 60 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial with a site in United States is open now. The open studies under Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 3 Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial studies recruiting now, none set no upper age limit and 3 stop at 75 or younger; none take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: 12 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 60 studies in Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial with a site in United States as a file.
02

Study summary

To evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of GSP 301 NS compared to 2 placebo NS formulations for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)

03

Conditions studied

  • Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged ≥12 years and older inclusive of either sex.
  2. Documented clinical history of PAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit [Visit 1]) and exhibiting a documented positive skin prick test (wheal diameter at least 3 mm greater than negative diluent control wheal) to at least 1 allergen known to induce PAR. Documentation of a positive result within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) is acceptable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women.
  2. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing.
  3. History of positive test for , or infection.
  4. Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip.
  5. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
  6. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
601 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GSP 301 NS

    Drug: GSP 301 NS

  • Placebo comparator
    GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7

    Drug: GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7

  • Placebo comparator
    GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0

    Drug: GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0

Interventions

  • FDC of olopatadine HCl and mometasone furoate: 2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks

  • DrugGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7

    2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks

  • DrugGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0

    2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).

    All TEAEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring in the study, in terms of nature, onset, duration, severity, relationship, and outcome were reported.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 13, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
Started400100101
Completed2877281
Not completed1132820
Withdrew: Adverse event1323
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2484
Withdrew: Physician decision100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4074
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study procedures500
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study drug200
Withdrew: Protocol deviation1044
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent or legal guardian100
Withdrew: Other1675

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).

All TEAEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring in the study, in terms of nature, onset, duration, severity, relationship, and outcome were reported.

Time frame:
52 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).
participantsGSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).2034154

Adverse events

Collected over The AEs and SAEs were collected from the time of signing the informed consent form until the end of study until 52 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GSP 301 NS0/393 (0%)7/393 (1.8%)72/393 (18.3%)
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.70/99 (0%)2/99 (2%)15/99 (15.2%)
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.00/101 (0%)2/101 (2%)25/101 (24.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/3931/990/101
Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/3931/990/101
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/3930/991/101
NephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders0/3930/991/101
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/3930/990/101
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/3930/990/101
Anaplastic astrocytomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3930/990/101
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3930/990/101
Renal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3930/990/101
Triple negative breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3930/990/101
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations25/3936/999/101
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations12/3935/996/101
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/3933/995/101
Nasal discomfortRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/3932/995/101
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders18/3932/992/101

Baseline characteristics

Participants at the baseline measurement are less than that started because some subjects were not randomized or did not use the study drug on at least one occasion.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0Total
Mean40.4 ± 14.842.1 ± 15.441.2 ± 13.540.8 ± 14.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0Total
Female2696868405
Male1243133188
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GSP 301 NSGSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0Total
American Indian or Alaska Native2103
Asian101213
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American951722134
White2827876436
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported4217
08

Study locations

34 sites
  • Investigational Site 2
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
  • Investigational Site 28
    Encinitas, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 27
    San Diego, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 29
    San Diego, California, United States
  • Investigational Site 32
    Denver, Colorado, United States
  • Investigational Site 26
    Aventura, Florida, United States
  • Investigational Site 9
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Investigational Site 33
    Tallahassee, Florida, United States
  • Investigational Site 11
    Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
  • Investigational Site 4
    Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Investigational Site 5
    Bethesda, Maryland, United States
  • Investigational Site 15
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Investigational Site 30
    Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
  • Investigational Site 19
    Skillman, New Jersey, United States
  • Investigational Site 18
    Corning, New York, United States
  • Investigational Site 7
    High Point, North Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 21
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 16
    Sylvania, Ohio, United States
  • Investigational Site 22
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Investigational Site 13
    Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
  • Investigational Site 23
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 24
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 3
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 31
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 34
    El Paso, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 6
    Kerrville, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 14
    New Braunfels, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 10
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 12
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 17
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 1
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 20
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 25
    Waco, Texas, United States
  • Investigational Site 8
    Waco, Texas, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Segall N, Prenner B, Lumry W, Caracta CF, Tantry SK. Long-term safety and efficacy of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Sep 1;40(5):301-310. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4233. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed 31248471 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2016, a primary completion of Jul 2017 and a completion of Jul 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2018, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 11, 2016
First posted
Mar 16, 2016
Start
Apr 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 2017
CompletionActual
Jul 2017
Results first posted
Sep 13, 2018
Last update
Feb 26, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02709538
Lead sponsor
Glenmark Specialty S.A.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2017
Completion
Jul 2017
Results posted
Sep 13, 2018
Last update
Feb 26, 2020

Study contacts

Sudeesh Tantry
study director · Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: GSP 301

Start the discussion