An interventional study of In-person CETA and Telephone CETA in Depression, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Anxiety, sponsored by Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-07.
Sponsored by Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study utilizes a Hybrid Type 1 multi-arm parallel group randomized control design to compare the effectiveness of an evidence-based treatment (CETA) delivered either in-person or via telephone, compared with a treatment as usual (TAU) control group, on improving adolescent and young adult (AYA) mental and behavioral health outcomes. The study will also gather information on counselor treatment knowledge, fidelity and competency following a technology-delivered training. Lastly, the cost associated with these strategies will be explored to inform future scale-up of training and services. This study will be conducted in Lusaka, Zambia and participants will be enrolled at four different levels: prospective CETA trainers, prospective CETA counselors, AYA clients, and research/organizational staff. AYA clients are the primary participant type.
The overall objective of this study is to evaluate implementation and service delivery strategies that can reduce the science-to-practice gap of evidence-based treatments (EBT) for mental health. Although evidence suggests that mental health treatments are acceptable and efficacious in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC) for the treatment of common mental disorders, there remains a gap in our understanding of how to bring these interventions to scale. Significant challenges include the high cost of in-person training, sustaining counselors in EBT, and limited client access to effective care.
The aim of this study is to test whether delivery of telephone CETA (T-CETA) can produce non-inferior, or similar, results to the standard in-person CETA for reducing mental and behavioral health problems among AYA and whether CETA and T-CETA are superior to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing these problems. The study design is a randomized, non-inferiority trial. CETA trainers (up to n=6) will be identified from an existing cadre of Zambian trainers-in-training (TTT), who will facilitate technology-delivered trainings for prospective counselors (up to n = 50) from several partner organizations in Zambia. Counselors who participate in the training will be trained in both in-person CETA and T-CETA. Once trained, counselors will provide treatment to AYA clients randomized to the CETA or T-CETA condition. Following completion of the study, TAU control participants will be offered CETA.
The transdiagnostic treatment being scaled up, CETA, was effective in several previous randomized clinical trials in LMIC settings with lay providers, including in Zambia. CETA provides the basis for feasible scale-up through the use a single therapy to treat multiple common mental disorders with varying severities, an approach that is more cost-effective than implementing multiple single-disorder focused psychotherapy treatments in LMIC.
Primary outcomes will be AYA client mental health and behavioral health outcomes. Secondary outcomes include trainer and counselor CETA competency and knowledge, and qualitative interviews of the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and scale-up potential of technology-based CETA training and treatment delivery. The cost-effectiveness of the technology training strategy and the two treatment delivery methods will also be evaluated.
The project will specifically strengthen the capacity of: 1) study staff to conduct mental health clinical science research, 2) counselor and trainers in CETA training, supervision and delivery, and 3) policy and decision makers to interpret and appropriately utilize the scientific evidence to improve mental health policies and programs. This proposal leverages previous studies and strong collaborations in Zambia with the Ministry of Health and numerous local organizations. Results from this trial will produce effectiveness and costing data on treatment delivery strategies that could inform the scale-up potential of diverse EBT in LMIC across and beyond mental health. This research study ultimately addresses both the treatment and implementation gaps in lower-resource settings globally.
CETA Counselors
Inclusion:
Exclusion:
CETA Trainers
Inclusion:
Adolescent/Young Adult (AYA) Clients
Inclusion:
Screening: Present with one or more common mental/behavioral health problems based on validated screening tools included in the audio computer assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) system. Specifically, the following screening tools and cut-off values:
Exclusion:
Research/Organizational Staff
Inclusion:
This is the in-person delivery method of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA).
Behavioral: In-person CETA
This is the technology-based delivery method for the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA).
Behavioral: Telephone CETA
This is the treatment as usual control condition who will engage with their usual care in the community and will receive CETA, if desired, following completion of the study.
Behavioral: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
The Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) is a transdiagnostic, multi-problem intervention designed to address adult and youth trauma, depression, anxiety, safety, and substance use. It is comprised of a small set of common elements found to be efficacious and prevalent across a range of EBTs to treat common mental health problems. CETA was designed to be flexible in the elements utilized, their order, and their dose (number of sessions) to allow counselors to address heterogeneity, comorbidity, and symptom fluctuations in and across clients. Treatment typically consists of 6 to 12 weekly, approximately 60-minute sessions delivered by lay workers.
Also known as: CETA
For adaptation of the CETA manual for telephone delivery, the Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) Group at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) reviewed evidence-based telehealth strategies and recommendations, telehealth ethical and legal guidelines, and clinical recommendations from telehealth providers. In addition, local TTTs in multiple contexts reviewed telehealth modifications and provided input that was incorporated into the final T-CETA manual used in this study. No changes were made to the structure, duration, and dose of CETA sessions, treatment components, or measurement-based clinical decision-making processes. Telehealth modifications, additions, and strategies were incorporated throughout the manual in delineated "telehealth boxes." This way, the original manual was maintained outside of the telehealth boxes, allowing for clear identification and training of telehealth modifications for both new and existing CETA counselors.
Also known as: T-CETA
The control condition is defined as 'treatment as usual'. In Zambia, there are no formal services or standard of care treatments for mental and behavioral health problems among AYA. There are, however, organizations (such as non-governmental organizations) operating in Lusaka that provide intermittent services for these types of problems. Some AYA receive informal counseling from parish priests or other leaders in their communities. In this study we are therefore defining these types of informal services as 'treatment-as-usual.' We will closely track the type, number, and degree of these kinds of services that all participants receive and access. Following the conclusion of the study, we will offer the CETA intervention to control participants if it has been found to be safe and effective
Also known as: TAU
Change in adolescent and young adult (AYA) internalizing and externalizing symptoms as measured by the Youth Self Report
Time frame: Baseline; within one month following CETA treatment (~3-4 months post-baseline for TAU participants); 6-month follow-up after treatment (~9 months post-baseline for TAU).
Change in adolescent and young adult (AYA) trauma symptoms as measured by the Child PTSD Symptom Scale
Time frame: Baseline; within one month following CETA treatment (~3-4 months post-baseline for TAU participants); 6-month follow-up after treatment (~9 months post-baseline for TAU).
Change in adolescent and young adult (AYA) substance use as measured by the ASSIST
Time frame: Baseline; within one month following CETA treatment (~3-4 months post-baseline for TAU participants); 6-month follow-up after treatment (~9 months post-baseline for TAU).
Change in adolescent and young adult (AYA) physical health and functioning as measured by the EQ-5D-Y
Time frame: Baseline; within one month following CETA treatment (~3-4 months post-baseline for TAU participants); 6-month follow-up after treatment (~9 months post-baseline for TAU).
Trainer competency & knowledge of Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA).
Assess competency and knowledge of trainers in training CETA using locally developed measures of competency and knowledge.
Time frame: Outcomes at the trainer level will be assessed at three time points: 1) after CETA counselor training (baseline), 2) three months into active cases (3 months post-baseline), and 3) at posttreatment (~9 months post-baseline).
Counselor competency & knowledge of Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA).
Assess competency and knowledge of counselors in training CETA using locally developed measures of competency and knowledge.
Time frame: Outcomes at the counselor level will be assessed at three time points: 1) after baseline CETA counselor training, 2) three months into active cases (3 months from baseline), and 3) following provision of CETA treatment (~9 months post-baseline).
Cost effectiveness of adapting training for technology delivery, and in-person and telephone delivery of CETA.
Cost-effectiveness analyses will calculate health utility values by deriving quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from health states reported at each follow up time point by AYA, and then estimate mean QALYs gained per treatment condition
Time frame: Costs assessed throughout course of the study up to 48 months.
Challenges, advantages, feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of a technology-delivered training and supervision model.
Qualitative interviews with trainers and counselors regarding technology training and treatment delivery strategies. Qualitative results will be used to support and enrich quantitative findings and to refine, support, and troubleshoot future iterations of technology-driven training.
Time frame: Trainer and counselor qualitative interviews will be conducted at two time points: 1) After counselor training (baseline), and 2) At post-treatment of CETA cases (~9 months post-baseline).
Challenges, advantages, feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of a telephone-delivered treatment delivery model (T-CETA).
Qualitative interviews with AYA clients regarding technology treatment delivery strategies. Qualitative results will be used to support and enrich quantitative findings and to refine, support, and troubleshoot future iterations of technology-driven treatment provision.
Time frame: AYA qualitative interviews will be conducted at CETA posttreatment (~3 months post-baseline).
Plan to share: Yes — All necessary steps will be taken to ensure adherence to all NIH guidelines on sharing raw data.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia