CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03457038Fc-MBL/PAMPsUpdated Apr 18, 2019

Use of Fc-MBL to Detect and Monitor the Presence of PAMPs During Septic Shock

An interventional study of Blood Test in Septic Shock, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Use Mannose Binding Lectin (MBL) as a biomarker to measure levels of Pathogen- Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMP) during septic shock. This will allow evaluating interest of this biomarker to monitor and manage a septic shock. Consecutive patients admitted for sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Department will be included. This biomarker will be compared to all the parameters monitored usually for these patients in standard care.

Read the detailed description

Septic shock still represent a major cause of admission in intensive care unit, incidence of severe sepsis is increasing, even in western countries, due to aging populations and comorbidities. Definition of septic shock was revised in 2016 by a task force, which emphasizes the need for future iterations. Indeed, there are no simple clinical or biological criteria ton diagnose septic patients with high risk of shock, or to prognose its severity. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are the wider biomarkers used to monitor septic patients. But they do not correlate with sepsis severity and moreover do not distinguish unequivocally between infection and noninfected systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Each microorganism has number of PAMPs, cell wall components (lipopolysaccharide endotoxin, peptidoglycan, outer membrane vesicles), flagella, mannan... High levels of these pathogen fragments are released in the bloodstream during sepsis. They trigger release of inflammatory cytokines that drive the sepsis cascade. Mannose binding lectin plays a pivotal role in innate immunity, binding with surface sugars of wide range of pathogens and their fragments. Thus MBL promotes opsonophagocytosis and activates the lectin-complement pathway. Fc-MBL, an engineered version of MBL has been developed to capture microorganism and treat sepsis. An ELISA, using Fc-MBL was developed to measure PAMPs in whole blood during sepsis. This assay will use Fc-MBL ELISA to quantify PAMPs during septic shock, to improve diagnostic and monitoring. But also, identifying patients with high levels of PAMPs for dialysis-like sepsis therapies.

PAMP's level will be compared to clinical, biological, microbiological and therapeutic outcomes. Its sensitivity will be evaluated by its kinetic among a septic shock (defined with Sepsis-3 criteria) and by correlation with CRP (C-Reactive Protein) and PCT (Procalcitonin). Its specificity will be evaluated by comparing its levels during septic and non-septic shocks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock

Keywords

  • Mannose-Binding Lectin, PAMPs,
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit for sepsis of any etiology
  • Patients with shock criteria: defined by a hypotension, hyperlactatemia, the use of vasopressive drugs.
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme- Patient giving consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patients
  • Organ transplant
  • Immunosuppressive drugs, other than corticosteroids
  • Patients who decline participating to the assay
  • Persons placed under legal protection, guardianship
  • Pregnant woman
  • Subject participating in another search including a exclusion period still in progress at pre-inclusion
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient with Septic Shock

    Patient Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit for sepsis of any etiology. The number of follow-up visits will not be changed compared to usual patient follow-up hospitalized in the intensive care unit but there will be blood testing more frequently

    Biological: Blood Test

Interventions

  • BiologicalBlood Test

    Addition to the current care but during the normal follow-up visit : * At the entrance to the service: search for bacterial 16S RNA in the blood * Additional blood tests (4) at T6-12-18 and 36h * At each visit: Sampling of an additional heparinized blood tube for the assay PAMPs. * 1 time per day: Assay of CRP and PCT from samples taken in common practice * J30: Assessment of the vital status of the patient

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantify in whole blood presence of PAMP during a septic shock,

    Quantify in whole blood presence of PAMP during a septic shock, using Fc-MBL ELISA :t o improve diagnostic by distinguishing a septic shock from another shock, and stating prognosis by studying PAMP kinetic under antibiotherapy.

    Time frame: Follow-up during 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare accuracy of Fc-MBL ELISA PAMP assay to CRP and PCT during septic shock.

    PAMP's level will be compared to clinical, biological, microbiological and therapeutic outcomes. Its sensitivity will be evaluated by its kinetic among a septic shock (defined with Sepsis-3 criteria) and by correlation with CRP and PCT. Its specificity will be evaluated by comparing its levels during septic and non-septic shocks.

    Time frame: Follow-up during 30 days

  2. Study PAMP's kinetic during septic shock from various origins

    PAMP's level will be compared to clinical, biological, microbiological and therapeutic outcomes. Its sensitivity will be evaluated by its kinetic among a septic shock (defined with Sepsis-3 criteria) and by correlation with CRP and PCT. Its specificity will be evaluated by comparing its levels during septic and non-septic shocks.

    Time frame: Follow-up during 30 days

  3. Identify patients who could beneficiate to a dialysis-like therapy

    identifying patients with high levels of PAMPs for dialysis-like sepsis therapies

    Time frame: Follow-up during 30 days

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03457038
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
Collaborators
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2018
Start date
Oct 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 18, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2019

Study contacts

Eric Oswald, MD
Contact
oswald.e@chu-toulouse.fr
5 67 69 04 17 ext. 33
Isabelle OLIVIER, PhD
Contact
olivier.i@chu-toulouse.fr
5 61 77 70 51 ext. 33
Eric Oswald, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion