ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03456700Updated May 8, 2025Results posted

Auranofin and Sirolimus in Treating Participants With Ovarian Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Auranofin and Laboratory Biomarker Analysis in Ovarian Serous Tumor and Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-08.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study is closed per results from the interim analysis.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 27 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by Mayo Clinic — 5 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Ovarian Neoplasms · Mayo Clinic.

Enrollment
14th of 23
22 · median 27
Started
2018
the only one that year
Phase 2
10 of 27
2 open now
Registered
15th of 27
by date

Among the 27 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by Mayo Clinic, this one is the 14th largest by enrollment of the 23 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 10 in phase 2, and was the 15th registered.

By phase

27 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 2this study10 · 2 open
Phase 19 · 1 open
Observational4 · 1 open
No phase2 · 1 open
Phase 1/22 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1991; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2018.

Size and results

Median enrollment 27 across the 23 interventional studies, 65 across the 4 observational. Of the 19 that completed or were terminated, 8 (42%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 27 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by Mayo Clinic, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This phase II trial studies how well auranofin and sirolimus work in treating participants with ovarian cancer. Immunosuppressive therapy, such as auranofin and sirolimus, is used to decrease the body?s immune response and may increase blood cell count.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the overall tumor response rate (ORR, that is, complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) of the combination of auranofin and sirolimus in the setting of metastatic serous ovarian cancer across all patients.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the overall tumor response rate (ORR, that is, complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) of the combination of auranofin and sirolimus in the setting of metastatic serous ovarian cancer within patients that have overexpression of PKCiota.

II. To estimate progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events from the combination of auranofin and sirolimus.

CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore whether PKCiota-relevant biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer tumors are associated with treatment response patterns, such as ORR, progression free survival, and overall survival.

OUTLINE:

Participants receive auranofin orally (PO) once daily (QD) and sirolimus PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unaccepted toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up every 6 months for 3 years.

03

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Serous Tumor
  • Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • (ECOG) performance score of 0 or 1
  • Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal cancer of serous histology
  • Incurable cancer
  • Willingness to provide paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of ovarian cancer
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: (ANC) >= 1500 uL
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: (PLT) >= 100,000 uL
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: (Hgb) >= 9 g/dL
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Total =\< 1.5 x (ULN) or direct bilirubin =\< ULN
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase () (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) (alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) =\< 3 x ULN or SGOT (AST) and SGPT (ALT) =\< 5 x ULN is acceptable if liver has tumor involvement
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Creatinine =\< 1.5 x ULN
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Fasting serum glucose =\< 1.5 x ULN
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Total cholesterol =\< 1.5 x ULN
  • Obtained =\< 14 days prior to registration: Triglycerides =\< 1.5 x ULN
  • >= 12 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Platinum-sensitive disease (exceptions allowed: patient has had a reaction to platinum or the treating oncologist thinks that further platinum therapy is not in the patient?s best interest)
  • Morbidities or concurrent major illness (for example, bowel obstruction or a second active ) that, in the opinion of the treating healthcare provider, would make participation in the trial problematic
  • or uncontrolled
  • Failure to recover from acute, reversible effects of prior therapy regardless of interval since last treatment

    • NOTE: Patients can have peripheral (sensory) neuropathy
  • History of hypertriglyceridemia or hypercholesterolemia and currently on medication(s)
  • Use of St. John?s wort =\< 7 days prior to registration
  • Unable to discontinue use of a strong inhibitor
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment (auranofin, sirolimus)

    Participants receive auranofin PO QD and sirolimus PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unaccepted toxicity.

    Drug: Auranofin · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Drug: Sirolimus

Interventions

  • Given PO

    Also known as: Ridaura

  • OtherLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

    Correlative studies

  • Given PO

    Also known as: AY 22989, RAPA, Rapamune, Rapamycin, SILA 9268A, WY-090217

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (Partial Response [PR] or Complete Response [CR] at Least 4 Weeks Apart)

    The outcome measure is the number of participants with a confirmed tumor response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\] at least 4 weeks apart). PR and CR are defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalisation of tumour marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

    Time frame: 1 year 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (PR or CR at Least 4 Weeks Apart) in the Subset of Participants That Have Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) Iota

    The outcome measure is the number of participants with a confirmed tumor response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\] at least 4 weeks apart) in the subset of participants that have overexpression of PKC iota. PR and CR are defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalisation of tumour marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

    Time frame: 1 year 4 months

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from registration to the first of either disease progression or death from any cause. Patients who receive the study drug, but then never return for an evaluation will be censored on their last follow-up date. PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria; Progression: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression), Unequivocal progression (see comments below) of existing non-target lesions. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression), or appearance of new malignant lesions.

    Time frame: 1 year 4 months

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from registration to death from any cause. OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

    Time frame: 1 year 4 months

  4. Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade 3 or Worse Adverse Event (AE)

    The outcome measure is the number of participants experiencing at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event (AE).

    Time frame: 1 year 4 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Started22
Completed21
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (Partial Response [PR] or Complete Response [CR] at Least 4 Weeks Apart)

The outcome measure is the number of participants with a confirmed tumor response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\] at least 4 weeks apart). PR and CR are defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalisation of tumour marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

Time frame:
1 year 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (Partial Response [PR] or Complete Response [CR] at Least 4 Weeks Apart)
ParticipantsTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (Partial Response [PR] or Complete Response [CR] at Least 4 Weeks Apart)0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (PR or CR at Least 4 Weeks Apart) in the Subset of Participants That Have Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) Iota

The outcome measure is the number of participants with a confirmed tumor response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\] at least 4 weeks apart) in the subset of participants that have overexpression of PKC iota. PR and CR are defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalisation of tumour marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

Time frame:
1 year 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (PR or CR at Least 4 Weeks Apart) in the Subset of Participants That Have Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) Iota
ParticipantsTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Number of Participants With a Confirmed Tumor Response (PR or CR at Least 4 Weeks Apart) in the Subset of Participants That Have Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) Iota0
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from registration to the first of either disease progression or death from any cause. Patients who receive the study drug, but then never return for an evaluation will be censored on their last follow-up date. PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined using RECIST 1.1 criteria; Progression: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression), Unequivocal progression (see comments below) of existing non-target lesions. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression), or appearance of new malignant lesions.

Time frame:
1 year 4 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)2.1 (1.8 to 3.7)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from registration to death from any cause. OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame:
1 year 4 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Overall Survival (OS)4.4 (2.6 to 12.5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade 3 or Worse Adverse Event (AE)

The outcome measure is the number of participants experiencing at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event (AE).

Time frame:
1 year 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade 3 or Worse Adverse Event (AE)
ParticipantsTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade 3 or Worse Adverse Event (AE)13

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)19/21 (90.5%)9/21 (42.9%)20/21 (95.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders3/21
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/21
SepsisInfections and infestations2/21
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/21
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders1/21
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/21
FatigueGeneral disorders1/21
FeverGeneral disorders1/21
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/21
Flank painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/21
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
FatigueGeneral disorders19/21
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders17/21
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders16/21
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders12/21
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/21
ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders11/21
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders9/21
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/21
DizzinessNervous system disorders8/21
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations7/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Median61 (39 to 79)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Female21
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White20
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Received prior chemotherapy for this cancer
Received prior chemotherapy for this cancer(Participants)Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Count of participants20
Tumor Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) iota
Tumor Over-expression of Protein Kinase C (PKC) iota(Participants)Treatment (Auranofin, Sirolimus)
Count of participants21
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rousselle B, Massot A, Privat M, Dondaine L, Trommenschlager A, Bouyer F, Bayardon J, Ghiringhelli F, Bettaieb A, Goze C, Paul C, Malacea-Kabbara R, Bodio E. Conception and Evaluation of Fluorescent Phosphine-Gold Complexes: From Synthesis to in vivo Investigations. ChemMedChem. 2022 Jun 3;17(11):e202100773. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202100773. Epub 2022 Mar 29. PubMed 35254001 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2020, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 1, 2018
First posted
Mar 7, 2018
StartActual
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2019
Results first posted
Jul 2, 2020
Last update
May 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03456700
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2018
Start date
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2019
Completion
Jul 31, 2019
Results posted
Jul 2, 2020
Last update
May 8, 2025

Study contacts

Aminah Jatoi, M.D.
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Auranofin · Sirolimus

Start the discussion