CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03452852Updated Mar 2, 2018

Prospective, RCT of Split Thickness Skin Grafts on Lower Leg After Compression Therapy With Compression Bandage vs. NPWT

An interventional study of PICO and Coban 2 lite in Skin Cancer, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-02.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The single center, prospective, randomized trial includes in total 60 patients. We want to compare two different treatment methods for compression therapy for split thickness skin graft in lower leg. The patients are randomized to compression therapy with NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy) using the device PICO or using the compression bandage with Coban 2 lite.

Primary outcome is complete healing of the skin transplant 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be to note frequency of infection, bleeding, loss of transplant etc.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Split thickness skin graft
  • Lower leg
  • Compression therapy
  • PICO
  • Coban 2 lite
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • >18 years
  • Signed informed consent
  • Surgical wound (excision of skin cancer)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignant melanoma
  • Signs of infection
  • Exposed tendon/bone in wound
  • Burn/chronic wound
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    NPWT (PICO device)

    In this arm, investigators will use the PICO system (Smith and Nephew) for compression therapy after split thickness skin graft of leg ulcers.

    Device: PICO

  • Other
    Compression bandaging (Coban 2 lite)

    In this arm, investigators will use the Coban 2 lite compression bandaging for compression therapy after split thickness skin graft of leg ulcers.

    Other: Coban 2 lite

Interventions

  • DevicePICO

    NPWT with PICO (Smith and Nephew)

  • OtherCoban 2 lite

    Compression bandaging with Coban 2 lite

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Healing of skin graft between the two Methods

    Numbers of patients with 100 % healing of the split thickness skin graft

    Time frame: 30 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of healing between the two Methods

    Average healing of the split thickness skin grafts

    Time frame: 30 days postoperatively

  2. Evaluation of pain with VAS (Visual analogic scale)

    Pain score as measured by VAS

    Time frame: 0, 5-7, 10-14 and 30 days postoperatively

  3. Level of function

    Evaluate change in daily function after surgery

    Time frame: 30 days postoperatively

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Plastic- and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo university hospital - Rikshospitalet
    Oslo, 0372, Norway
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03452852
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Responsible party
Martina Eva Kristiansen (MD, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 2, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 2, 2018

Study contacts

Martina Kristiansen, MD
Contact
martk4@ous-hf.no
+47 6809453
Elisabeth Valio Sætnan, MD
Contact
elsaet@ous-hf.no
+47 980 96613
Thomas Moe Berg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Plastic- and reconstructive surgery, Oslo university hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion