ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07830888MVP-RiskUpdated Sep 29, 2026

Mitral Valve Prolapse Arrhythmic Risk

An observational study in Mitral Valve Prolapse and Ventricular Arrhythmias and Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-29.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Updated Sep 29, 2026Primary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is common with a 2-3 % prevalence in the general association and generally associated with a favorable prognosis. However, a subgroup of MVP patients, known as arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) has an increased burden of severe ventricular arrhythmias and risk of sudden cardiac death. Identifying high risk patients who may benefit of potential implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is therefore critically important. Risk stratification in AMVP is still challenging, and the ability to estimate arrhythmic risk at the individual level is limited.

Read the detailed description

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is common with a 2-3 % prevalence in the general association and generally associated with a favorable prognosis. However, a subgroup of MVP patients, known as arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) has an increased burden of severe ventricular arrhythmias and risk of sudden cardiac death. Identifying high risk patients who may benefit of potential implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is therefore critically important. Risk stratification in AMVP is still challenging, and the ability to estimate arrhythmic risk at the individual level is limited.

The aim of this study is to develop and validate a risk prediction model for severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with AMVP, with the goal of improving individualized risk stratification and identying patients who may warrant consideration for ICD therapy.

This is a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort study of patients with mitral valve prolapse and ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline characteristics are defined based on the clinical status at the index event and during the subsequent six months. Clinical events occurring six months or more after the index event are considered follow-up events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mitral Valve Prolapse
  • Ventricular Arrhythmias and Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Mitral Valve Prolapse
  • Ventricular Arrhythmias
  • Sudden Cardiac Death
03

In context

Mitral Valve Prolapse

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Mitral Valve Prolapse; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 150 across 25 observational studies indexed under Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Browse Mitral Valve Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 834 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Mitral Valve Prolapse with Ventricular Arrhythmias

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • MVP according to the ESC definition AND
  • Arrhythmic burden of:
  • A total PVC burden ≥ 0,5 % per day OR
  • Documentation of NSVT on any modality OR
  • More severe ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, aborted cardiac arrest) that occurred >1 month after the beginning of follow up.

AND

- Follow up >6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • VT/VF as the initial presentation without prior cardiac evaluation (, echo, Holter)
  • History of myocardial infarction
  • Obstructive coronary diseases - ≥50 % stenosis that was not treated
  • History of coronary artery bypass surgery
  • Significant valve disease other than MVP - rheumatic heart disease, severe aortic stenosis
  • LGE suggestive of probable myocarditis as the etiology.
  • Primary inherited arrhythmia - Brugada syndrome, short , long QT, CPVT
  • Carrier of disease causing mutation known to be associated with arrhythmia even when phenotype is negative (e.g. Lamin A/C)
  • Sustained ventricular arrhythmia clearly caused by a reversable cause
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse and Ventricular Arrhythmias

    Patients with mitral valve prolapse and ventricular arrhythmias will be included in the study cohort. Clinical, echocardiographic, arrhythmic and other cardiac imaging variables will be evaluated in relation to the occurence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. No study-specific intervention is performed.

    Other: Risk prediction model

Interventions

  • OtherRisk prediction model

    A multivariable risk prediction model will be developed and validated to estimate the individual risk of severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse. The model will be based on clinical, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, echocardiographic and CMR variables. The risk prediction model is evaluated as part of this observational study and does not constitute a study-specific therapeutic or diagnostic intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurence and Number of Severe Ventricular Arrhythmias in participants

    Occurence and number of severe ventricular arrhythmias, defined as ventricullar fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, aborted cardiac arrest or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, occuring more than 1 month after baseline.

    Time frame: From >6 months after baseline until the end of available follow-up, minimum follow-up 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sabbag A, Essayagh B, Barrera JDR, Basso C, Berni A, Cosyns B, Deharo JC, Deneke T, Di Biase L, Enriquez-Sarano M, Donal E, Imai K, Lim HS, Marsan NA, Turagam MK, Peichl P, Po SS, Haugaa KH, Shah D, de Riva Silva M, Bertrand P, Saba M, Dweck M, Townsend SN, Ngarmukos T, Fenelon G, Santangeli P, Sade LE, Corrado D, Lambiase P, Sanders P, Delacretaz E, Jahangir A, Kaufman ES, Saggu DK, Pierard L, Delgado V, Lancellotti P. EHRA expert consensus statement on arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse and mitral annular disjunction complex in collaboration with the ESC Council on valvular heart disease and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed cby the Heart Rhythm Society, by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and by the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):1981-2003. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac125. PubMed 35951656 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to data protection requirements, ethical approvals, and data-sharing agreements betweens participating institutions.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2035, 109 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartActual
Aug 7, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2035
CompletionEst.
Sep 2035
Last update
Sep 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedOccurence and Number of Severe Ventricular Arrhythmias in participantsTime frame: From >6 months after baseline until the end of available follow-up, minimum follow-up 6 months
Sep 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 29, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedOccurence and Number of Severe Ventricular Arrhythmias in participantsTime frame: From >6 months after baseline until the end of available follow-up, minimum follow-up 6 months
    + 1 other change: criteria formatting

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830888
Responsible party
Kristina Hermann Haugaa (Professor, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 7, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2035 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2026

Study contacts

Kristina Hermann Haugaa, Professor, MD, PhD
Contact
mvp-risk@ous-hf.no
+47 23070000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion