ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03446664MicroburstUpdated Oct 25, 2022

Microburst Vagus Nerve Stimulator (VNS) Therapy Feasibility Study

An interventional study of Microburst Stimulation in Epilepsies, Partial and Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic, sponsored by LivaNova. Completed at 9 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by LivaNova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2021, 5 years 3 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 102 studies in Epilepsies, Partial with a site in United States — 18 open to participants now, 24 under way, 6 of them phase 3. Epilepsies, Partial · United States.

Enrollment
60th of 86
33 · median 100
Started
2018
with 2 others
No phase
14 of 102
6 open now
Registered
69th of 102
by date

Among the 102 studies in Epilepsies, Partial with a site in United States, this one is the 60th largest by enrollment of the 86 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 14 with no phase, and was the 69th registered.

Epilepsies, Partial

243 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsies, Partial; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 90 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsies, Partial.

Browse Epilepsies, Partial studies →

Open to participants now

18 of the 102 studies in Epilepsies, Partial with a site in United States are open now.

All 18 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 37 Epilepsies, Partial studies recruiting now, 9 (24%) set no upper age limit and 24 (65%) stop at 75 or younger; 17 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 12 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 102 studies in Epilepsies, Partial with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Evaluate the initial safety and effectiveness of Microburst VNS stimulation in subjects with refractory epilepsy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsies, Partial
  • Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of medically epilepsy with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (limited to 20 subjects) or partial onset seizures including complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization (limited to 20 subjects).
  2. Must be on adjunctive antiepileptic medications.
  3. Willing and capable to undergo multiple evaluations with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalogram (EEG) and (ECG).

4(A) For subjects with partial onset seizures: An average of ≥ 3 countable seizures per month based on seizure diary during the 3 month baseline period and no seizure-free interval greater than 30 days during those 3 months.

4(B) For subjects with PGTCs: Have at least ≥ 3 countable seizures during the 3 month baseline period. Note: Each seizure within a cluster may be counted as separate seizures.

  1. 12 years of age or older.
  1. Subject is a male or non-pregnant female adequately protected from conception. Females of must use an acceptable method of .
  1. Provide written -assent/Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization and self-reported measures with minimal assistance as determined by the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently using, or are expected to use, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy.
  2. A VNS Therapy System implant would (in the investigator's judgment) pose an unacceptable surgical or medical risk for the subject.
  3. A planned procedure that is for VNS therapy.
  4. History of implantation of the VNS Therapy System.
  5. Currently receiving treatment from an active implantable medical device.
  6. Presence of contraindications to MRI per the MRI subject screening record.
  7. Known cardiovascular arrhythmias currently being managed by devices or treatments that interfere with normal intrinsic heart rate responses (e.g., pacemaker dependency, implantable defibrillator, beta adrenergic blocker medications).
  8. History of chronotropic incompetence (commonly seen in subjects with sustained bradycardia [heart rate \< 50 bpm]).
  9. Cognitive or psychiatric deficit that in the investigator's judgment would interfere with the subject's ability to accurately complete study assessments.
  10. History of status epilepticus within 1 year of study enrollment.
  11. Dependent on alcohol or narcotic drugs as defined by DSM IV-TR within the past 2 years, based on history. Tests for drug or alcohol use will not be administered.
  12. Currently being treated with prescribed medication that contains cannabis or cannabis related substance including recreational use.
  13. Any history of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.
  14. Currently participating in another clinical study without LivaNova written approval.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Microburst Stimulation

    Microburst stimulation to tolerability and effectiveness

    Device: Microburst Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceMicroburst Stimulation

    Implantable generator with new stimulation feature under study to determine the safety and effectiveness of device stimulation on different seizure types.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy Primary Endpoint: Percent change from baseline in seizure frequency

    For the primary endpoint, the change in the seizure frequency per month compared to baseline will be evaluated for each subject at follow-up visits month 6 and 12.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  2. Safety Primary Endpoint: Occurrence of stimulation related Adverse Events

    Assess stimulation/device related adverse events at follow-up visits month 6 and 12.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in seizure frequency per month based on seizure diary provided by the sponsor

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  2. Change from baseline in seizure severity

    As measured by the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) scale (Cramer, 2002).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  3. Change from baseline in quality of life

    As measured by the QOLIE-31-P for adults 18 years and older (Cramer et al.; 1998) and QOLIE-AD-48 for adolescents 12 to 17 years (Cramer et al.; 1999).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  4. Change from baseline in antiepileptic drug (AED) load

    Estimated as the sum of the prescribed daily dose (PDD)/defined daily dose (DDD) ratios for each AED included in the treatment regimen (Deckers et al., 1997), where DDD (WHO ATC/DDD index) corresponds to the assumed average therapeutic daily dose of a drug used for its main indication.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  5. Suicidality as measured by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months study visit

  6. All adverse events

    Time frame: Up to 12 months visit

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of Denver Colorado
    Denver, Colorado 80204, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Rush University
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Northwestern University
    Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
  • Weil-Cornell Medical College
    Ithaca, New York 10065, United States
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Ghent University Hosptial
    Ghent, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 41 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2018
First posted
Feb 27, 2018
StartActual
Feb 27, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Oct 27, 2021
Last update
Oct 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03446664
Lead sponsor
LivaNova
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2018
Start date
Feb 27, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2021
Completion
Oct 27, 2021
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

Selim Benbadis, MD
principal investigator · University of South Florida Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion