ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03443648Updated May 1, 2018

External Fixator Assisted Genu Varum Correction

An interventional study of External fixator assisted plaing in Deformity, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-01.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 10 studies in Congenital Abnormalities by Assiut University — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Congenital Abnormalities · Assiut University.

Started
2018
with 1 other
No phase
3 of 10
1 open now
Registered
1st of 10
by date

Among the 10 studies in Congenital Abnormalities by Assiut University, this one is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 3 with no phase, and was the 1st registered.

By phase

10 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational7 · 1 open
No phasethis study3 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2017; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2018.

Size and results

Median enrollment 3 across the 3 interventional studies, 110 across the 7 observational. Of the 3 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies in Congenital Abnormalities by Assiut University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Assessment of accuracy of correction of genu varum more than 20 degrees using external fixator assisted plating. Intraoperatively, the operative time needed for completion of accurate correction, torniquet use, blood loss will be assessed. Postoperative complications either early ones like infection, thromboembolic complications, peroneal nerve palsy or late post operative complications like implant failure, delayed union, non union and bone healing time will be assessed..

Read the detailed description

Malalignment prevents proper transmission of forces across the knee leading to advance or even start the progression of osteoarthritis.Preoperative planning is necessary to identify the level and magnitude of the deformity. Corrections can be performed acutely or gradually. Acute correction can be achieved by opening wedge, closing wedge or dome osteotomies followed by internal fixation. On the other hand, gradual correction can be achieved by osteotomy with external fixation.

Although osteotomy with internal fixation is more convenient to the patient than external fixator, it has many drawbacks. These include the need for large surgical exposure, soft tissue stripping and difficulty executing precise deformity correction. Meticulous preoperative planning is important when internal fixation is planed. It also needs to be executed precisely till fixation is completed. Under-correction or over-correction is possible while executing the procedure. Furthermore, iatrogenic deformity in other planes may also develop. If such a deformity is significant, it may adversely affect the function or may lead to excessive loading on adjacent joints. In some cases, revision of surgery for further correction may be required to correct this residual or iatrogenic deformity.

External fixation can be used for gradual correction of genu varum. In spite of the disadvantages of external fixation like being uncomfortable for the patient, tethering soft tissue, associated pin site infection and irritation , it is re-adjustable postoperatively. This allows controlled accurate correction of the mechanical axis of the lower limb.

Our study is implicated on correction of high degree genu varum which is more than 20 degrees .To correct such deformity, it is difficult to calculate the amount of wedge opening intraoperative. The described trigonometric calculation of the size of the base is described for deformity less than 20 degrees .In this study we are going to use a hybrid technique of both external and internal fixation, so we can make use of the benefits of both internal and external fixation techniques External fixation by limb reconstruction system (LRS) or Taylor Spatial frame(TSF) is used to control and stabilize fragments while performing the desired correction. A locked T plate is then applied to stabilize the fully corrected osteotomy. This allows intraoperative removal of the external fixator without loss of correction. Then we compare the planned correction with the achieved correction.

03

Conditions studied

  • Deformity
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18years old or more
  2. Varus 20 degrees or more

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. to internal fixation
  2. Associated osteoarthritis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • ProcedureExternal fixator assisted plaing

    The plate length is marked on the skin. Limb reconstruction system (LRS) with one swivel clamp or Taylor Spatial frame (TSF) is used in all cases. The fixator is put in a plane parallel to that of the deformity. Two tapered pins are placed on either side of the planned osteotomy site and passed at a distance from the osteotomy so that they will not impede the subsequent internal fixation. Swivel clamps or the struts of the TSF are aligned in such a way that full correction is achieved. After osteotomy, swivel clamp is loosened and angular correction is achieved. Translation is carried out according to preoperative planning. If readjustment is required the swivel clamps or TSF struts are loosened and further correction is carried out. Once desired correction is achieved, the clamps or struts are tightened. Definitive internal fixation is carried out while external fixation holds the fragments. For internal fixation, locked T plate will be used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. assesment of accuracy of correction of high degree genu varum using this method of correction.

    assessment of mechanical axis deviation in degrees, mechanical tibiofemral angle in degrees, medial proximal tibial angle in degrees and the position of mechanical axis ratio. They are all measured in the immediate post operative long film and the long film after one year. The normal angles are known documented angles so, we will compare the preoperative and postoperative angles with the normal ones.Immediate postoperative long film on the lower limbs to compare pre and postoperative angles with the normal angles. Another long film is done after one year to follow up the achieved correction

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, Clark BM, Dieppe PA, Griffin MR, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer TJ. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Nov;38(11):1541-6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381104. PubMed 7488273 ↗
  • Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):188-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.188. Erratum In: JAMA 2001 Aug 15;286(7):792. PubMed 11448282 ↗
  • Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Mar;69(3):332-54. PubMed 3818700 ↗
  • Tuli SM, Kapoor V. High tibial closing wedge osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthrosis of knee. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jan;42(1):73-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.38585. PubMed 19823659 ↗
  • Sundaram NA, Hallett JP, Sullivan MF. Dome osteotomy of the tibia for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Nov;68(5):782-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B5.3782246. PubMed 3782246 ↗
  • Rozbruch SR, Segal K, Ilizarov S, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov G. Does the Taylor Spatial Frame accurately correct tibial deformities? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1352-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1161-7. Epub 2009 Nov 13. PubMed 19911244 ↗
  • Kazemi SM, Qoreishi M, Behboudi E, Manafi A, Kazemi SK. Evaluation of Changes in the Tibiotalar joint after High Tibial Osteotomy. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 May;5(3):149-152. PubMed 28656162 ↗
  • Gugenheim JJ Jr, Brinker MR. Bone realignment with use of temporary external fixation for distal femoral valgus and varus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1229-37. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00008. PubMed 12851347 ↗
  • Bar-On E, Becker T, Katz K, Velkes S, Salai M, Weigl DM. Corrective lower limb osteotomies in children using temporary external fixation and percutaneous locking plates. J Child Orthop. 2009 Apr;3(2):137-43. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0165-x. Epub 2009 Mar 12. PubMed 19308625 ↗
  • Rozbruch SR. Fixator-assisted plating of limb deformities. Oper Tech Orthop. 2011;21:174-.
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4. PubMed 2805470 ↗
  • Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Sep;(198):43-9. PubMed 4028566 ↗
  • Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994 Jul;25(3):425-65. PubMed 8028886 ↗
  • Paley D. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Principles of deformity correction; p 1-18.12.
  • Paley D. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Principles of deformity correction; pp. 175-94
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2018; primary completion for Mar 2020, 21 months later.

Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Congenital Abnormalities, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 76 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 72.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2017
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2020
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2020
Last update
May 1, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03443648
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Kerolos Maged (Resident in the orhtopaedics and traumatology department, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Start date
Jun 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2018

Study contacts

Kerolos Maged, MBBCH
Contact
Kerolosmaged230@gmail.com
+2/01063692926
Wael El Adly, MD
Contact
eladlyw@gmail.com
01224265850

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion