A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Early intensive BP control in Blood Pressure and Acute Stroke, sponsored by National University of Singapore. Completed at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-16.
Sponsored by National University of Singapore · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
Management of acutely elevated blood pressure during the early phase of ischemic stroke remains controversial. In patients treated with IV-tPA, the risk of ICH is closely related to the BP levels. However, intensive reduction of BP carries a theoretical risk of clinical deterioration by inducing cerebral hypoperfusion. Assessment of cerebral perfusion before and after BP reduction is one of the most scientific method to evaluate the safety (and potential benefits) of BP management in the acute phase of stroke. This project will impact practices and delivery of BP management during the acute phase of ischemic stroke. The findings would aid in designing phase 3 clinical trials will track clinical indicators, including the impact on functional outcomes as well as quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness.
Specific aims-
Hypothesis- Investigators hypothesize that early and intensive BP lowering in AIS is safe in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA). Furthermore, such reductions in BP would not produce any significant reduction of CBF on CT perfusion or adversely affect the functional outcomes at 3 months
Methodology - AIS patients presenting within 4.5hours of symptom-onset with measurable neurological deficits (NIHSS >4points), treated with intravenous thrombolysis and having elevated BP (systolic BP 160-185mmHg) would be included. In this randomised open label pilot study (with blinded end-point analysis), study participants in target group would receive intravenous Labetalol infusion for 72hours (target systolic BP 140-160mmHg).Close neurological monitoring and serial CT perfusion studies would be performed to evaluate the short-term clinical effects and changes in CBF. Functional outcomes would be evaluated by modified Rankin scale at 3months.
Conclusion This pilot randomised study would provide preliminary data about the safety of intensive BP lowering in AIS and form a basis of designing a larger phase III study.
Exclusion Criteria:
BP in participants in this arm is treated aggressively, lowered and maintained at systolic blood pressure between 140-160mmHg, within 6 hours of stroke onset and maintained in this range for first 72 hours.
Biological: Early intensive BP control
Participants are treated according to the current international guidelines in thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke patients, i.e., less than 180/105mmHg
Participants in the early intensive BP control arm are treated with BP lowering medications, with an aim to bring the systolic BP to 140-160mmHg and maintain this level for 72 hours post-ictus
Increase in NIHSS during early intensive BP lowering
Proportion of subjects whose NIHSS increases by 4 or more points during active BP reduction.
Time frame: within first 72 hours
Good functional outcome
Proportion of subjects achieving modified Rankin score 0-1 in early intensive BP control as compared to the subjects treated with guideline based BP control
Time frame: at 90 days
Ccerebral blood flow reduction during BP control
Proportion of subjects whose cerebral blood flow on CT perfusion reduces by 20% or more during intensive BP lowering as compared to guideline based approach of BP management in acute ischemic stroke
Time frame: within first 72 hours
Plan to share: Yes — We might consider sharing IPD if a study with similar design enters into a meaningful scientific collaboration
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National University of Singapore