CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07774468Updated Aug 19, 2026

Platform for End-of-life Awareness, Conversations, and Education (PEACE) Among Registered Nurses

An interventional study of Death Conversation and Online ACP Education in Death Anxiety, Death Attitude (Implicit/Explicit) and End of Life Care, sponsored by National University of Singapore. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by National University of Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the PEACE program can improve early career registered nurses' registered nurses' attitudes towards caring for palliative patients, ability to cope with patients' death, and self-efficacy in initiating advanced care planning conversations

This study aims to address the following research questions:

  • Does the PEACE program improve early career registered nurses' attitudes towards caring for palliative patients, ability to cope with patients' death and self-efficacy in initiating advanced care planning conversations?
  • What are the participants' experiences of participating in the PEACE program?

Researchers will compare participants who receive the PEACE program (death conversation and online ACP education) with participants who receive only the online ACP education to see if informal death conversations improve early career registered nurses' attitudes towards caring for palliative patients, ability to cope with patients' death and self-efficacy in initiating advanced care planning conversations.

Participants will:

  • Complete online questionnaires measuring attitudes towards caring for palliative patients, ability to cope with patients' death and self-efficacy in initiating advanced care planning conversations.
  • Participate in a facilitator-led group discussion session about experiences of patients' deaths, coping with patients' death and dying, communications with patients and/or family members about death and dying, and discussing advance care planning with patients and/or family members (intervention group only).
  • Complete an asynchronous online ACP education session consisting of short recorded videos and an online discussion forum (both intervention and control group).
  • Complete follow-up surveys, including a 3-month follow-up assessing whether participants have engage with any patients and/or their family members in advance care planning conversations.
02

Conditions studied

  • Death Anxiety
  • Death Attitude (Implicit/Explicit)
  • End of Life Care
  • Advanced Care Planning (ACP)

Keywords

  • Death Conversation
  • Death Anxiety
  • Advance Care Planning
  • Death Attitude
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Registered nurses within the first five years of practice
  • Between the ages of 21 to 65 years
  • Currently working in a healthcare setting in SIngapore

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participated in a similar death conversation program
  • Received training in Advance Care Planning or Serious Illness Conversations
  • Any self-reported history of mental health disorders (e.g., depression), or neurological disorders (e.g., brain tumors)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group - on site group discussions + online learning session

    Participants in this arm will receive the two-session PEACE Program. Session 1 is an on site, facilitator-led group discussion lasting 2 hours, covering: 1. Experiences of death and dying 2. Coping with death and dying. 3. Communication about death and dying 4. Discussing Advance Care Planning (ACP). Session 2 is an online asynchronous learning session with short videos on ACP with discussion forums.

    Behavioral: Death Conversation · Behavioral: Online ACP Education

  • Active comparator
    Control Group - Only online learning session

    Participants in this arm will only receive the online ACP education component, identical to Session 2 of the PEACE programme. No facilitator-led group discussions are provided.

    Behavioral: Online ACP Education

Interventions

  • BehavioralDeath Conversation

    On site, facilitator-led group discussion lasting 2 hours, covering: 1) Experiences of patients' deaths; 2) Coping with patients' death and dying; 3) Communication with patients and/or family members about death and dying; 4) Discussing advance care planning with patients and/or family members

  • BehavioralOnline ACP Education

    An online asynchronous learning session with short videos on ACP with discussion forums.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale

    A 30-item 5 point Likert scale. Positive items are scored one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Scores are reversed for negative items. Possible scores can range from 30-150. A higher score indicates a more positive attitude toward caring for this patient population.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale

    A 30-item 5 point Likert scale. Positive items are scored one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Scores are reversed for negative items. Possible scores can range from 30-150. A higher score indicates a more positive attitude toward caring for this patient population.

    Time frame: Post-test (Immediately at end of 2-weeks intervention)

  3. Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale

    A 30-item 5 point Likert scale. Positive items are scored one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Scores are reversed for negative items. Possible scores can range from 30-150. A higher score indicates a more positive attitude toward caring for this patient population.

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Palliative care self-efficacy scale

    A twelve item 4-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Need further basic instruction) to 4 (Confident to perform independently). Higher scores indicate nurses having higher degree of confidence with the respective patient/family interactions and patient management topics.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Palliative care self-efficacy scale

    A twelve item 4-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Need further basic instruction) to 4 (Confident to perform independently). Higher scores indicate nurses having higher degree of confidence with the respective patient/family interactions and patient management topics.

    Time frame: Post-test (Immediately at end of 2-weeks intervention)

  3. Palliative care self-efficacy scale

    A twelve item 4-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Need further basic instruction) to 4 (Confident to perform independently). Higher scores indicate nurses having higher degree of confidence with the respective patient/family interactions and patient management topics.

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

  4. Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy (ACP-SE) Scale

    An 18-item 5-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident), with higher scores indicating more confidence in performing respective tasks regarding Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations for patients.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy (ACP-SE) Scale

    An 18-item 5-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident), with higher scores indicating more confidence in performing respective tasks regarding Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations for patients.

    Time frame: Post-test (Immediately at end of 2-weeks intervention)

  6. Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy (ACP-SE) Scale

    An 18-item 5-point Likert scale, scored from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident), with higher scores indicating more confidence in performing respective tasks regarding Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations for patients.

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

  7. End-of-life planning conversations

    Self-reported number of conversations held with patients regarding Advance Care Planning

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

06

Study locations

1 site
  • National University of Singapore
    Singapore, Singapore
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07774468
Lead sponsor
National University of Singapore
Responsible party
Ang Wei How Darryl (Research Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Darryl Ang, PhD
Contact
darrylang@nus.edu.sg
+65 65167792

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion