CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03438916Updated Mar 14, 2023

MRI to Assess the Effect of Non-selective Beta-blocker in Patients With Cirrhosis

An observational study in Portal Hypertension, Cirrhosis and Esophageal Varices, sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 78 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-14.

Sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 78 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Standardization and new therapeutic treatments of variceal bleeding has significantly reduced the mortality the last 25 years, but there is still a high 6-week mortality around 15-20% and 1-year mortality of about 40%. Cirrhotic patients without prophylactic treatment suffer a risk of 60% of re-bleeding within the first year after the first bleeding episode. Variceal ligation and NSBB are the standard therapy as secondary prophylaxis, while only non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) is offered as first-line therapy in primary prophylaxis. If portal pressure is reduced to a value below 12 mmHg or by 20% (10% if assessed by intravenous administrations), the risk of bleeding is substantially reduced, but not all patients respond to the treatment with propranolol (40-50%). Hence, patients who are non-responders to NSBB should be offered alternative treatment with e.g. carvedilol, which is a combined alpha-beta-receptor blocker or endoscopic band ligation. Currently, the response to NSBB is assessed invasively during a liver vein catheterization (LVC). Unfortunately, only a few centres in the world can perform this procedure and there are no reliable non-invasive alternatives to assess the respond to NSBB, which is of extreme importance, since non-responders have three fold increased risk of a new variceal bleeding episode.

Aim:

In general the aim of the project is to develop faster and non-invasive methods to evaluate portal hypertension and individual pharmacological response of NSBB in patients with cirrhosis. Furthermore, we expect to detect changes in liver and spleen stiffness as measured by MR-Elastography (MRE) after NSBB and that these depend on the drug-related effects on portal pressure.

Study design and patients:

39 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices that require NSBB (propranolol) treatment.

Patients are assessed with LVC, MR-scans, echocardiography and biochemical tests. LVC is the gold standard method to test if patients respond to propranolol treatment. At visit 1. the response to NSBB is defined as a reduction of HVPG ≥10%, or to a HVPG\< 12mmHg after intravenous NSBB administrations during LVC. MRI-scan with intraveneus NSBB administration is performed at visit 2. Minimum 5 days of NSBB wash out between visit 1 and 2.

Read the detailed description

MR-elastography and Phase Contrast MRI compared to LVC

02

Conditions studied

  • Portal Hypertension
  • Cirrhosis
  • Esophageal Varices
  • Gastric Varices Bleeding
  • Varice Bleed
  • Liver Diseases
  • Liver Cirrhosis

Keywords

  • Non-selective beta-blocker
  • Pharmacological respons
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Hemodynamic assessments
  • Echocardiography
  • MR-elastography
  • Propranolol
  • Liver vein catheterization
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 78 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

39 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices that require NSBB (propranolol) treatment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices that require NSBB treatment
  • Patients of more than 18 and less than 78 years of age
  • Patients with a portal pressure HVPG ≥ 12mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with absolute contraindication for MRI
  • Patients with absolute contraindication for NSBB
  • Pregnant women
  • Patient with severe hemodynamic comorbidity
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NSBB response defined as a reduction in HVPG >10% or HVPG <12 mmHG after intraveneus NSBB administrations compared to flow (mL/min) in splanchnic vessels

    To assess if changes in MR flow induced with NSBB (propranolol) administrations can predict the changes in HVPG after NSBB administration (NSBB respons) assessed by LVC

    Time frame: after 20 minutes respons time

Secondary outcomes

  1. MR-elastography

    To assess the liver and spleen stiffness (kPa) with MRE before and after intraveneus NSBB administration

    Time frame: after 20 minutes

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre of Gastroenterology, Dept. of medicine. Hvidovre University Hospital
    Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Danielsen KV, Hove JD, Nabilou P, Yin M, Chen J, Zhao M, Kallemose T, Teisner AS, Siebner HR, Ehman RL, Moller S, Bendtsen F. Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2021 Sep;41(9):2149-2158. doi: 10.1111/liv.14981. Epub 2021 Jun 16. PubMed 34060714 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03438916
Lead sponsor
Hvidovre University Hospital
Responsible party
Flemming Bendtsen (Professor, MD, Hvidovre University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2020
Completion
Dec 8, 2020
Last update
Mar 14, 2023

Study contacts

Flemming Bendtsen, Professor
principal investigator · Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion