ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07377487INDIGOUpdated Oct 21, 2026

TheraSphere Japan Pre-Market Study

An interventional study of TheraSphere Y-90 glass microsphere in Liver Neoplasms, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Recruiting at 5 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Site recruiting status changed1 site addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of BSJ019T in Japanese patients with primary or secondary liver who are not candidate for standard treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Carcinoma
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
  • Neoplasms
  • Digestive System Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
  • Neoplasms by Histologic Type
  • Neoplasms by Site
  • Digestive System Diseases
  • Liver Diseases
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Colonic Diseases
  • Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
03

In context

Liver Neoplasms

1,345 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Neoplasms; 335 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 51 is close to the median of 48 across 928 interventional studies indexed under Liver Neoplasms.

Browse Liver Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 528 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

[Inclusion criteria based on the clinical evaluation]

  1. Patient aged >18 years at time of consent
  2. Patient is able and willing to participate in the study and has provided written
  3. Patient who is determined to have failed or not be eligible for standard treatment by the multidisciplinary board
  4. Primary or secondary liver cancer (by histology or imaging)
  5. defined as at least one uni-dimensional measurable liver lesion by CT/MRI (according to 1.1)
  6. Liver dominant disease (patient prognosis is driven by liver tumor)
  7. Tumor replacement \<50% of total liver volume based on visual estimation by the investigator
  8. Expected ≥ 3 months or more from the index procedure
  9. Performance Status score of 0 or 1
  10. Negative pregnancy test in women of
  11. Adequate for the patient and his/her sexual partner when applicable.
  12. Adequate liver function, as defined by:

    • A or to B7 (HCC)
    • Must have ≤ 2 mg/dL
    • and AST must be \<5 x
    • Albumin ≥3.0 g/dL
  13. Adequate renal function, as defined by:

    • Serum creatinine must be ≤1.5 x ULN
  14. Adequate hematological function, as defined by:

    • > 1200 /mm3
    • ≥85 mg/L
    • count >50 x 109/L
    • must be \<2.0 or >50% prothrombin activity

    [Inclusion Criteria based on the imaging evaluation]

  15. After 99mTc MAA administration, in SPECT/CT imaging, good PVT targeting and uptake of 99mTc MAA, if present
  16. Future liver remnant volume (FLRV) >30% of whole liver volume. FRLV is the volume of liver not planned to be treated with TheraSphere and free of tumor

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

[Exclusion Criteria based on the clinical evaluation]

  1. Vp4 according to the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) portal vein tumor thrombosis classification1
  2. History of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics sedatives or atropine that cannot be managed medically.
  3. to angiography and selective visceral catheterization
  4. Received any prior external beam radiation treatment to the liver
  5. Received any prior yttrium-90 microsphere treatment to the liver
  6. Received previous peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)
  7. Plan to start systemic anticancer treatment in the next 3 month after the index procedure.
  8. Presence of ongoing adverse event due to prior therapy as judged by the principal investigator or sub-investigator to affect the safety evaluation of the study device.
  9. Evidence of pulmonary insufficiency or clinically evident
  10. Undergone any intervention for, or compromise of, the Ampulla of Vater within that last 3 months or patient with biliodigestive anastomosis.
  11. Presence of ascites, clinical or radiological, "trace" of ascites is acceptable.
  12. Presence of Hepatic encephalopathy (Grade ≥2)
  13. Previous liver function decompensation within the last 6 months (ascites, encephalopathy, jaundice)
  14. Patient with infiltrative disease presentation (not suitable for repeated measurement)
  15. Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding and does not want to stop.
  16. Have any disease or condition that would preclude the safe use of BSJ019T, including concurrent dialysis treatment, or unresolved serious infections
  17. Participating in concurrent clinical studies or interventional clinical studies
  18. Any condition where the Investigator feels the patient would not be able to participate/finish the study
  19. Previous gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension within the last 3 months (preventive treatment is acceptable)

    [Exclusion Criteria based on the imaging evaluation]

  20. Dose to the lung > 30Gy for a single treatment or cumulative >50 Gy
  21. Evidence of any off-target extrahepatic and liver deposition on 99mTc-MAA that cannot be corrected using angiographic techniques
  22. Cone Beam CT (CBCT) or 99mTc-MAA hepatic arterial perfusion scintigraphy shows poor tumor perfusion and/or poor tumor targeting that would lead to a dose that does not meet the liver dosing criteria as specify in the protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TheraSphere

    Device: TheraSphere Y-90 glass microsphere

Interventions

  • DeviceTheraSphere Y-90 glass microsphere

    TheraSphere Y-90 glass microsphere therapy administered through the hepatic artery at index procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of hepatic disease control (DCR = complete response [CR], partial response [PR] or stable disease [SD]) at 3 months using the localized RECIST 1.1 criteria.

    Time frame: 3-months post index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of objective response (ORR = complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) at 3 months using the localized RECIST 1.1 criteria and localized mRECIST

    Time frame: 3-months post index procedure

  2. Rate of hepatic disease control (DCR) and objective response (ORR) at 6 months using localized RECIST 1.1 and localized mRECIST criteria

    Time frame: 6-months post index procedure

  3. Best response using localized RECIST 1.1 and localized mRECIST criteria.

    Time frame: Through 6-months post index procedure

  4. Proportion of patient receiving concomitant and post BSJ019T treatment, including subsequent local and systemic anticancer treatment, surgery, intervention and best supportive care.

    Time frame: Through 6-months post index procedure

  5. Safety assessment: rate of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade, rate of grade 3 or above TEAEs, rate of SAEs of any causality and rate of SAEs related to treatment with TheraSphere.

    All AEs will be evaluated using the standardized grading criteria (National Cancer Institute- Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events- Version 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE v 5.0))

    Time frame: Through 6-months post index procedure

  6. Technical success in delivering the Y-90 microspheres

    Technical success is determined successful if residual waste is ≦2% with optimal tumor targeting and extrahepatic deposition is not seen on post treatment imaging, and the success rate of entire of the subjects will be summarized.

    Time frame: During the index procedure

  7. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EQ-5D questionnaires at regular intervals

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-, 3- and 6-months post treatment

  8. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using FACT-G questionnaires at regular intervals

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-, 3- and 6-months post treatment

  9. Overall survival

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
1 site added. 3 sites changed recruiting status (3 now recruiting)
Show 3 sites
  • Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital · Nishinomiya, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Kindai University Hospital · Sayama, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • National Cancer Center Hospital · Chuo Ku, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
Show site
  • Nara Medical University Hospital · Kashihara, Japan
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    1 site added. 3 sites changed recruiting status (3 now recruiting)
    Show 3 sites
    • Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital · Nishinomiya, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Kindai University Hospital · Sayama, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • National Cancer Center Hospital · Chuo Ku, JapanNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Show site
    • Nara Medical University Hospital · Kashihara, Japan
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07377487
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 22, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Satoru Motohashi
Contact
satoru.motohashi@bsci.com
+81(80)4619-9640
Koichiro Yamakado, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hyogo Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion