ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03431285Updated May 28, 2025Results posted

Ketamine for Acute Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patients

An interventional study of Morphine Group and Ketamine Group in Sickle Cell Crisis, sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-28.

Sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
278
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators hypothesize that administration of ketamine for pain relief in sickle cell patients with vaso-occlusive crisis early on will lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and less narcotic requirement.

Read the detailed description

Sickle cell disease is an inherited hematological disorder where the shape of red blood cells (RBC) is altered into a sickle-like cells resulting in red blood cell destruction and therefore anemia and other complications. It's a widely spread condition in African American population as well as the Southern and Eastern Provinces of Arabian Peninsula.

Acute painful episodes are a very common complication of the disease process, mainly thought to be a result of tissue ischemia due to occlusion of the microcirculation with clusters of sickled RBC(1). This usually involves long bones or spine but can involve other areas. Acute painful crises can also be precipitated by cold exposure, dehydration, infection, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia, or in some cases it is not related to a specific trigger. This condition puts the patient in severe pain requiring multiple Emergency Department (ED) visits and sometimes admission to the hospital. Currently the mainstay of therapy for acute painful crises is hydration and IV analgesia (2). This makes pain control challenging for the emergency physician as management of acute painful crises requires multiple doses of intravenous (IV) opioids. A retrospective study of 19 patients and 57 visits showed that accumulative dose of IV morphine ranged between 4 milligram (mg) and 26.7 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) during 70% of the visits. 50% of the patients were admitted after less than 3 hours of ED treatment, 28% of the discharged patients returned to the ED within 3 days (3). Also, as other chronic pain patients, sickle cell disease patients develop opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) leading to activation of N- methyl D Aspartate receptors (NMDA) (1).

The use of ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, may have the potential to modulate the OIH through impaired sensitization of spinal neurons to nociceptive stimuli and may, therefore, impede development of and blunt neuropathic pain. Extensive search of literature databases showed few published reports and retrospective studies including few patients which have addressed the use of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute painful crises in sickle cell disease (SCD) (4-6). A retrospective study (5) included 5 children and adolescents received a low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of sickle cell-related pain demonstrated reduced pain scores in 40% of patients and significant reduction in opioid utilization in only 20% of patients. However, that report was retrospective in nature, non-powered, and included few patients. A recent Canadian retrospective study including 9 adult and adolescent patients demonstrated statistically significant reduced cumulative morphine consumption (146±16.5 mg/day vs. 112.±12.2 mg/day) and pain scores after adding intravenous ketamine in patients with painful sickle cell crises (7). Similarly, another American investigators reported decreased opioid consumption with infusing low-dose ketamine as an adjuvant analgesic in 30 patients presented with sickle cell disease with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), that study was retrospective (2). Moreover, in year 2017, a prospective, randomized, double dummy trial was done comparing the adverse effects and analgesic efficacy of low-dose ketamine for acute pain in the ED either by single intravenous push or short infusion. This study shows that low-dose ketamine administered as short infusion is related with a significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push (8)

To the best of investigator's knowledge, there is no large, prospective, comparative, controlled clinical trial investigated in the addition of low-dose ketamine in shortening the ER stays and improving the quality of analgesia in patients with VOC.

Sample Size

A data obtained from a pilot study included 10 patients who received either morphine or ketamine showed that the mean and SD of pain visual analogue score (VAS) at 1-hour following administering the study drug among patients presented with sickle-cell VOC were (Morphine 6.5 ± 3.41565, Ketamine: 1.6667 ± 1.52753).

An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of 220 patients is sufficiently large to detect a mean difference in the pain VAS of 1.5 that would have a clinical importance, with a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. Additional patients (20%) will be added for a final sample size of 264 patients to compensate for those dropping out during the study.

Interim Analysis

An independent safety committee will perform three interim analyses on information time 25% (55 patients), 50% (110 patients) and 75% (165 patients). Data evaluation at each interim analysis will be based on the alpha spending function concept, according to Lan and DeMets, and will employ O'Brien-Fleming Z-test boundaries, which are very conservative early in the trial. For the first interim analysis the efficacy stopping rule would require an extremely low P value (P\< 0.000015). For the second interim analysis P\< 0.003 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. For the third interim analysis P\< 0.02 will be taken as efficacy stopping rule. Investigators will be kept blind to the interim analysis results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Crisis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Vaso-Occlusive Crises

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Vaso-Occlusive Crises; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 278 is above the median of 81 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Vaso-Occlusive Crises.

Browse Vaso-Occlusive Crises studies →

Lead sponsor

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Known diagnosis of SCD based on sickle cell tests and electrophoresis.
  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • Acute onset of painful crises, defined as having an onset within 7 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Breast-feeding
  • Altered mental status
  • greater than 40 kg/m2
  • Patients with significant neurological disease
  • Seizures
  • Acute head injury
  • Acute eye injury
  • Patients with high intra-cranial tension
  • Patients with known psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with significant cardiac diseases
  • Arrhythmias
  • Patients with significant pulmonary diseases rather than acute chest syndrome
  • Patients with significant renal disease (BUN/creatinine ratio \< 25)
  • Patients with significant hepatic disease ( class B or C)
  • Patients with significant endocrine disease
  • Known allergy to phencyclidine derivatives
  • Known allergy to ketamine
  • Known allergy to morphine
  • Sepsis
  • Septic shock
  • Patients required circulatory support
  • Patients required ventilatory supports
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Drug abuse
  • Patients with chronic pain status unrelated to SCD
  • Patients receiving anti-convulsant medications
  • Patients receiving anti-psychiatric medications.
  • Patients with communication barriers.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
278 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Morphine Group

    Patients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration.

    Drug: Morphine Group · Other: standard IV hydration

  • Active comparator
    Ketamine Group

    Patients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml normal saline (NS) infused over 30 minutes in addition to standard IV hydration

    Drug: Ketamine Group · Other: standard IV hydration

Interventions

  • Patients will receive standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration.

    Also known as: Control Group

  • Patients will receive low dose ketamine 0.3 mg/kg in 100ml N.S. infused over 30 min in addition to standard IV hydration

    Also known as: Intervention Group

  • Otherstandard IV hydration

    IV hydration as per our institutional protocol (Lactated Ringer's or NaCl 0.9% solution will be infused at a rate of 2-3 ml/kg/h)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Scores

    Mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale score over 3 hours. Pain was measured on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)

    Time frame: NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay in ED

    Described as time elapsed from the start of study medication to the readiness for hospital discharge.

    Time frame: for 5 hours following admission to ED

  2. Cumulative Use of Opioid

    The cumulative use of opioid will be recorded during the ED stay

    Time frame: for 3 hours following admission to the ED

  3. The Rate of Hospital Admission

    Number of admitted patients to the hospital after enrollment to study

    Time frame: within 3 hours following study enrollment

  4. Drug-related Adverse Effects

    flushing, hypotension, altered mental status, itching, paresthesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, nausea, vomiting

    Time frame: 3 hours following drug administration

07

Results

Posted May 28, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Limitations included this being a single centre trial, thereby restricting the generalizability of the findings. Also, 180 minutes might be a short timeframe to assess impact of a study drug. Moreover, we calculated the use of a single low dose of ketamine that might be inadequate to provide our hypothesized superiority in the ketamine treated arm. Therefore, future studies

Participant flow

Completed

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMorphine GroupKetamine Group
Started140138
Completed140138
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Scores

Mean difference in the numerical pain rating scale score over 3 hours. Pain was measured on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain)

Time frame:
NPRS will be recorded every 30 minutes for a maximum of 180 minutes.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Scores
score on a scaleMorphine GroupKetamine Group
Pain Scores5.6 ± 1.905.7 ± 2.13
SecondaryLength of Stay in ED

Described as time elapsed from the start of study medication to the readiness for hospital discharge.

Time frame:
for 5 hours following admission to ED
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Length of Stay in ED
hoursMorphine GroupKetamine Group
Length of Stay in ED4.8 ± 2.474.7 ± 1.98
SecondaryCumulative Use of Opioid

The cumulative use of opioid will be recorded during the ED stay

Time frame:
for 3 hours following admission to the ED
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg
Cumulative Use of Opioid
mg/kgMorphine GroupKetamine Group
Cumulative Use of Opioid0.13 ± 0.110.07 ± 0.07
SecondaryThe Rate of Hospital Admission

Number of admitted patients to the hospital after enrollment to study

Time frame:
within 3 hours following study enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Rate of Hospital Admission
ParticipantsMorphine GroupKetamine Group
The Rate of Hospital Admission3426
SecondaryDrug-related Adverse Effects

flushing, hypotension, altered mental status, itching, paresthesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, nausea, vomiting

Time frame:
3 hours following drug administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Drug-related Adverse Effects
ParticipantsMorphine GroupKetamine Group
Drug-related Adverse Effects38

Adverse events

Collected over 180 minutes. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Morphine Group0/140 (0%)0/140 (0%)3/140 (2.1%)
Ketamine Group0/138 (0%)0/138 (0%)8/138 (5.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMorphine GroupKetamine Group
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/1404/138
dizzinessEar and labyrinth disorders3/1403/138
vomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/1401/138

Baseline characteristics

Intention to treat

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Morphine GroupKetamine GroupTotal
Median29.6 ± 7.929.1 ± 8.429.4 ± 8.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Morphine GroupKetamine GroupTotal
Female5858116
Male8280162
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Morphine GroupKetamine GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian140138278
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Morphine GroupKetamine GroupTotal
Saudi Arabia140138278
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Numerical Pain Rating Scale(units on a scale)Morphine GroupKetamine GroupTotal
Mean8.7 ± 1.38.6 ± 1.38.6 ± 1.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
    Dammam, Eastern 31952, Saudi Arabia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alshahrani MS, Asonto LP, El Tahan MM, Al Sulaibikh AH, Al Faraj SZ, Al Mulhim AA, Al Abbad MF, Al Nahhash SA, Aldarweesh MN, Mahmoud AM, Almaghraby N, Al Jumaan MA, Al Junaid TO, Al Hawaj FM, AlKenany S, ElSayed OF, Abdelwahab HM, Moussa MM, Alossaimi BK, Alotaibi SK, AlMutairi TM, AlSulaiman DA, Al Shahrani SD, Alfaraj D, Alhazzani W. Study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of ketamine for acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease. Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3394-4. PubMed 31133061 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study protocol, statistical plan, and results will be shared after publishing the manuscript. Currently, it is submitted and under peer review.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: for 5 years after completing the study

Access criteria: Through direct contact with the Principal Investigator

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 12 months.

Results were first posted in May 2025, 6 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2018
First posted
Feb 13, 2018
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 10, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2019
Results first posted
May 28, 2025
Last update
May 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03431285
Lead sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Responsible party
Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani (Associate professor - Emergency medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2019
Completion
Feb 1, 2019
Results posted
May 28, 2025
Last update
May 28, 2025

Study contacts

Mohammed SS Alshahrani, MD
principal investigator · King Fahad Hospital of the University -Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University - (Dammam University)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Morphine · Ketamine

Start the discussion