ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03424109Updated Jun 22, 2025Results posted

Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER)

An observational study in Emergencies, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 66 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-22.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Emergencies)No conditionIs this wrong?Emergencies describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
98,922
Ages
66 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This proposal builds upon the evaluation of Primary Palliative Care Education, Training, and Technical Support for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER) implemented in a cluster-randomized, stepped wedge design in 33 Emergency Departments (EDs).

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergencies

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Emergency Department
  • Palliative Care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,430 studies on the registry; 258 are open to participants now.

Of its 235 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
66 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Eligible patients will include ED patients 66 years or older with serious, life-limiting illness who visited any of our EDs during the implementation of PRIM-ER.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must demonstrate one-year mortality of at least 30 percent (score > 6) according to the Gagne Index, a validated instrument used to measure all cause one-year mortality in community-dwelling older adults, calculated based on their prior 12 months before the index ED visit of Medicare claims.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ED patients transferred from a nursing home on the index ED visit will be excluded since prediction of mortality and disposition of such patients differs from community-dwelling adults.
  • Patients currently receiving hospice at the time of the index ED visit will also be excluded since they have already received services.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
98,922 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Beneficiaries with a one-year mortality of at least 30%

    The patient cohort will be extracted via the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC) using a two-step process to maximize diversity, and minimize intentional or unintentional exclusions based on risk, age, health literacy, demographics, or expected adherence.

    Behavioral: healthcare service utilization in the six months following the ED visit

Interventions

  • Behavioralhealthcare service utilization in the six months following the ED visit

    The analysis of the effect of PRIM-ER on ED disposition using a generalized linear binomial model with random site level effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute Care Admission

    Proportion of eligible patients whose disposition is to an acute care setting (inpatient, non-palliative service).

    Time frame: Index Visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With Emergency Department (ED) Revisits

    Measured as the proportion of patients with at least one ED revisit in the six months following the index ED visit (Count)

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  2. Inpatient Days

    Measured as the proportion of patients who had at least one inpatient stay in the six months following the index ED visit (Count).

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  3. Home Health Use

    Proportion of patients with any home health use in the six months following the index ED visit (Yes/No)

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  4. Hospice Use

    Proportion of patients with any hospice use in the six months following the index ED visit (Yes/No).

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  5. Proportion of Patients Who Died at Month 6 Post-Index Visit

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  6. Survival: Time-to-event

    Number of days from index ED visit to death among those who died within six months following the index ED visit (Count of days)

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

07

Results

Posted Jun 22, 2025

Participant flow

Control Period
Participant flow — Control Period
MilestoneControl for Six Months, Then PRIM-ER
Started50458
Completed50458
Not completed0
PRIM-ER Intervention Period
Participant flow — PRIM-ER Intervention Period
MilestoneControl for Six Months, Then PRIM-ER
Started48464
Completed48464
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcute Care Admission

Proportion of eligible patients whose disposition is to an acute care setting (inpatient, non-palliative service).

Time frame:
Index Visit
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Acute Care Admission
Proportion of participantsControlPRIM-ER
Acute Care Admission0.6440.613
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Emergency Department (ED) Revisits

Measured as the proportion of patients with at least one ED revisit in the six months following the index ED visit (Count)

Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of Patients
Proportion of Patients With Emergency Department (ED) Revisits
Proportion of PatientsControlPRIM-ER
Proportion of Patients With Emergency Department (ED) Revisits0.60.6
SecondaryInpatient Days

Measured as the proportion of patients who had at least one inpatient stay in the six months following the index ED visit (Count).

Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Inpatient Days
Proportion of participantsControlPRIM-ER
Inpatient Days0.4100.366
SecondaryHome Health Use

Proportion of patients with any home health use in the six months following the index ED visit (Yes/No)

Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Home Health Use
Proportion of participantsControlPRIM-ER
Home Health Use0.4200.381
SecondaryHospice Use

Proportion of patients with any hospice use in the six months following the index ED visit (Yes/No).

Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Hospice Use
Proportion of participantsControlPRIM-ER
Hospice Use0.1770.172
SecondaryProportion of Patients Who Died at Month 6 Post-Index Visit
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Who Died at Month 6 Post-Index Visit
Proportion of participantsControlPRIM-ER
Proportion of Patients Who Died at Month 6 Post-Index Visit0.2810.287
SecondarySurvival: Time-to-event

Number of days from index ED visit to death among those who died within six months following the index ED visit (Count of days)

Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Survival: Time-to-event
DaysControlPRIM-ER
Survival: Time-to-event17.3 ± 38.817.1 ± 37.7

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control14,179/50,458 (28.1%)——
PRIM-ER13,910/48,464 (28.7%)——

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlPRIM-ERTotal
Mean78.2 ± 8.577.7 ± 8.378 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlPRIM-ERTotal
Female251372390449041
Male253212456049881
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlPRIM-ERTotal
Hispanic or Latino7357271462
Not Hispanic or Latino497234773797460
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlPRIM-ERTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native9360153
Asian155512332788
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American6341700613347
White396423730876950
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported282728575684
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlPRIM-ERTotal
United States504584846498922
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chung FR, Turecamo S, Cuthel AM, Grudzen CR; PRIM-ER Investigators. Effectiveness and Reach of the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER) Pilot Study: a Qualitative Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):296-304. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06302-2. Epub 2020 Oct 27. PubMed 33111240 ↗
  • Tan A, Durbin M, Chung FR, Rubin AL, Cuthel AM, McQuilkin JA, Modrek AS, Jamin C, Gavin N, Mann D, Swartz JL, Austrian JS, Testa PA, Hill JD, Grudzen CR; Group Authorship: Corita R. Grudzen on behalf of the PRIM-ER Clinical Informatics Advisory Board. Design and implementation of a clinical decision support tool for primary palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1021-7. PubMed 31992301 ↗
  • Grudzen CR, Brody AA, Chung FR, Cuthel AM, Mann D, McQuilkin JA, Rubin AL, Swartz J, Tan A, Goldfeld KS; PRIM-ER Investigators. Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER): Protocol for a Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomised, Stepped Wedge Design to Test the Effectiveness of Primary Palliative Care Education, Training and Technical Support for Emergency Medicine. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e030099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030099. PubMed 31352424 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Will share all policies, practices, materials, and tools to facilitate collaboration, reuse, and replication, including clinical workflows, design specifications for our clinical decision support and learning management system, code sets for extraction, and definition of data from Medicare administrative claims. PI will comply with the ResDAC VRDC rules regarding the sharing and reporting of data in aggregate form only. A final dataset will not be available for collaboration, reuse, and replication of the findings because of our decision to use the ResDAC VRDC.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Immediately following publication. No end date.

Access criteria: Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03424109
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2022
Results posted
Jun 22, 2025
Last update
Jun 22, 2025

Study contacts

Keith S Goldfeld, DrPH, MS, MPA
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion