ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03409770COMETUpdated Aug 4, 2023

Optimising the Duration of Cooling in Mild Encephalopathy

An interventional study of Therapeutic hypothermia in Neonatal Encephalopathy, Hypothermia Neonatal and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, sponsored by Thayyil, Sudhin. Active, not recruiting at 8 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 6 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-04.

Sponsored by Thayyil, Sudhin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 6 Hours
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 24 studies in Hypothermia with a site in United Kingdom — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Hypothermia · United Kingdom.

Planned enrollment
4th of 18
140 · median 82
Started
2019
with 1 other
No phase
15 of 24
2 open now
Registered
19th of 24
by date

Among the 24 studies in Hypothermia with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 4th largest by planned enrollment of the 18 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2019, is one of 15 with no phase, and was the 19th registered.

By phase

24 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study15 · 2 open
Observational6 · 1 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 0 open
Phase 31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1999; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2019.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 82 across the 18 interventional studies, 194 across the 6 observational. Of the 17 that completed or were terminated, 5 (29%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies in Hypothermia with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Phase II randomised control trial of whole body cooling in mild neonatal encephalopathy.

Read the detailed description

Although therapeutic hypothermia for 72 hours reduces brain injury and improves long term neurodevelopmental outcomes after moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy, the benefits and optimal duration of cooling therapy in mild encephalopathy is not known. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years occur in 16% of babies with un-treated mild neonatal encephalopathy. In the phase I of the COMET trial, we have shown that it is feasible to identify and randomise babies with mild encephalopathy, and to obtain the primary outcome (proton MR spectroscopy levels of Thalamic N-acetyl Aspartate) accurately. The phase II of the COMET trial will examine the benefits and optimal duration of cooling therapy in babies with mild encephalopathy.

Research questions

  1. Does whole body cooling initiated within 6 hours of birth and continued for 72 hours increase thalamic MR spectroscopy N-acetyl aspartate levels in babies with mild encephalopathy, when compared with those who are not cooled? (Cohort 1)
  2. In babies with mild encephalopathy undergoing cooling therapy as clinical care, does rewarming at 48 hours as opposed to 72 hours result in similar thalamic N-acetyl aspartate levels? (Cohort 2)

Study Population Cohort 1: A total of 60 babies with mild encephalopathy (>36 weeks; >2Kg) aged less than 6 hours will be recruited from several tertiary neonatal units in the UK, Europe, USA and Canada, over a 2 year period. The babies will be randomised to usual care (no cooling) or cooling therapy (core temperature 33 to 34 C) for 72 hours within six hours of birth. MR imaging and spectroscopy will be performed between 4 to 14 days after birth.

Cohort 2: A total of 80 babies will mild encephalopathy (>36 weeks; >2Kg) aged 24 to 48 hours and undergoing cooling therapy as a part of standard clinical care will be recruited from several UK cooling centres, over a 2 year period. The babies will be randomised to rewarming after 48 hours or 72 hours of cooling therapy. MR imaging and spectroscopy will be performed between 4 to 14 days after birth. The babies recruited to cohort 1 will not be eligible for recruitment to cohort 2.

Primary outcome (both cohorts)

  • Proton MR spectroscopy Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate levels between 4 to 14 days of age.

Benefits of the trial These data will inform the national and international guidelines on management of babies with mild neonatal encephalopathy. If a shorter duration of cooling is as good or better than 3 days of cooling, this will reduce the intensive care stays, opioid use and separation from parents.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Encephalopathy
  • Hypothermia Neonatal
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 6 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All of the following three criteria should be met:

  1. Age less than six hours. AND
  2. Evidence of acute perinatal asphyxia

    1. Metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.0 and/or BE >-16) in cord gas or a blood gas within one of birth.

      OR

    2. If the pH or BE is borderline (pH\<7.15 to 7.0) and/or BE >-10 to -16) in cord and/or blood gas within 1h of birth additional evidence of perinatal asphyxia is required, which includes either an acute obstetric event (e.g. cord prolapse, abruption, shoulder dystocia) OR Need for continued resuscitation or ventilation at 10 minutes and/or a 10 min Apgar score \<6
  3. Evidence of mild NE (at-least two abnormalities) on an NICHD neurological examination performed between 1 and 6h of birth.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The following group of babies will be excluded prior to randomisation

  1. Babies without encephalopathy
  2. Babies with moderate or severe encephalopathy who meet the current NICE/AAP guidelines for cooling therapy.
  3. Babies with seizures (clinical and/or aEEG/EEG)
  4. Babies with moderate or severe abnormalities on aEEG voltage criteria.
  5. Babies with life threatening congenital malformations
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Usual care (normothermia) arm

  • Experimental
    Therapeutic hypothermia - 48 h

    Whole body cooling (33 to 34 C) for 48 hours

    Other: Therapeutic hypothermia

  • Experimental
    Therapeutic hypothermia - 72 h

    Whole body cooling (33 to 34 C) for 72 hours

    Other: Therapeutic hypothermia

Interventions

  • OtherTherapeutic hypothermia

    Whole body cooling using a servo controlled device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate level

    Feasibility of obtaining Proton MR spectroscopy thalamic N-acetyl aspartate level

    Time frame: 4 to 14 days after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brain injury on conventional MR imaging

    Cortical, white matter or deep nuclei injury

    Time frame: 4 to 14 days after birth

  2. Hospital stay

    Duration of hospital stay

    Time frame: Upto 30 days after birth

07

Study locations

8 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Prempunpong C, Chalak LF, Garfinkle J, Shah B, Kalra V, Rollins N, Boyle R, Nguyen KA, Mir I, Pappas A, Montaldo P, Thayyil S, Sanchez PJ, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Sant'Anna G. Prospective research on infants with mild encephalopathy: the PRIME study. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):80-85. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.164. Epub 2017 Nov 2. PubMed 29095433 ↗
  • Oliveira V, Singhvi DP, Montaldo P, Lally PJ, Mendoza J, Manerkar S, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Therapeutic hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: a national survey of practice in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F388-F390. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313320. Epub 2017 Sep 23. PubMed 28942433 ↗
  • Lally PJ, Montaldo P, Oliveira V, Swamy RS, Soe A, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Residual brain injury after early discontinuation of cooling therapy in mild neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F383-F387. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313321. Epub 2017 Sep 21. PubMed 28935718 ↗
  • Lally PJ, Pauliah S, Montaldo P, Chaban B, Oliveira V, Bainbridge A, Soe A, Pattnayak S, Clarke P, Satodia P, Harigopal S, Abernethy LJ, Turner MA, Huertas-Ceballos A, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy (MARBLE): a prospective multicountry study. BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 30;5(9):e008912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008912. PubMed 26423856 ↗
  • Robertson NJ, Thayyil S, Cady EB, Raivich G. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy biomarkers in term perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy: from neuropathological correlates to future clinical applications. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2014;10(1):37-47. doi: 10.2174/157339631001140408120613. PubMed 25055862 ↗
  • Lally PJ, Price DL, Pauliah SS, Bainbridge A, Kurien J, Sivasamy N, Cowan FM, Balraj G, Ayer M, Satheesan K, Ceebi S, Wade A, Swamy R, Padinjattel S, Hutchon B, Vijayakumar M, Nair M, Padinharath K, Zhang H, Cady EB, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Neonatal encephalopathic cerebral injury in South India assessed by perinatal magnetic resonance biomarkers and early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087874. eCollection 2014. Erratum In: PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92526. PubMed 24505327 ↗
  • Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Taylor A, Bainbridge A, Cady EB, Chong WK, Murad S, Omar RZ, Robertson NJ. Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e382-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1046. Epub 2010 Jan 18. PubMed 20083516 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data can be shared unconditionally will be made available when scientific manuscripts are published. Data that cannot be shared publicly (e.g. to protect patient confidentiality) will be by request only. The PI will review each request on case-by-case basis. Upon approval the data requester will be asked to sign a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be available 3 to 6 after the end of the study.

Access criteria: Unidentified data will be shared by publication. Request for data that affects patient confidentiality will review by the study PI on a case-by-case basis.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2024, 56 months after the start.

Of 132 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypothermia, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 56 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 135 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 10, 2018
First posted
Jan 24, 2018
StartActual
Oct 10, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2024
CompletionEst.
Aug 30, 2024
Last update
Aug 4, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03409770
Lead sponsor
Thayyil, Sudhin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2018
Start date
Oct 10, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 4, 2023

Study contacts

Sudhin Thayyil, PhD
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion