ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03403855Updated Sep 25, 2020

Rocket® Pleural Catheters: QOL, Feasibility and Satisfaction in Recurrent MPE Patients

An interventional study of Rocket® IPC- Long External Length and Rocket® IPC- Short External Length in Malignant Pleural Effusion, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-25.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will take place in Ottawa, Ontario, and will include 100 patients who are receiving tunnelled pleural catheters to treat their symptoms of MPE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the shorter versus longer external length Rocket® pleural catheter in managing malignant pleural effusions in terms of patients' self-rated quality of life, its ease of use, the incidence of complications, and levels of health care provider satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Pleural effusion is a medical condition, which occurs when too much fluid collects in the space between the lungs and the chest wall. This extra fluid makes it hard for the lungs to fully expand and take in enough air when inhaling. Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are effusions related to cancer. Common symptoms of MPE include: dyspnea (shortness of breath), cough, weight loss, and chest pain. Tunneled pleural catheters (which are inserted into the body) are now commonly used to treat the symptoms of malignant pleural effusions by draining this extra fluid on a daily basis. This drainage can be done and home and need not be performed at a hospital.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the shorter versus longer external length Rocket® pleural catheter in managing malignant pleural effusions in terms of patients' self-rated quality of life, its ease of use, the incidence of complications, and levels of health care provider satisfaction. The Rocket® pleural catheter has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada for the management of malignant pleural effusions.

This study will take place in Ottawa, Ontario, and will include 100 patients who are receiving tunnelled pleural catheters to treat their symptoms of MPE. All information required to evaluate the Rocket® catheter will be collected from routine medical follow-up visits. The period of time for the study is approximately 4 weeks (28 days).

The Rocket® catheter will be provided to patients who wish to participate in this study. If patients do not wish to participate, they will receive the current standard of care (the PleurX catheter) and will undergo the same standard medical assessments that will be performed in this study.

All patients eligible for the study will have a regular full length Rocket catheter inserted at baseline, with an external length of 16cm. All patients will have their catheter length modified at 2 weeks in clinic and shortened to an external length of 5cm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Pleural Effusion
03

In context

Pleural Effusion, Malignant

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 55 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant.

Browse Pleural Effusion, Malignant studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Presence of symptomatic (BDI \< 6), and moderate sized (> 1/3 of hemithorax) MPE
  2. Persistent malignant pleural effusion that is free flowing
  3. of at least 2 months (approximate duration of follow-up for the study)
  4. Age greater than 18
  5. Consent to undergoing TPC treatment for recurrent MPE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior attempted chemical pleurodesis on ipsilateral side
  2. Active pleural or pulmonary infection
  3. Currently hospitalized for reasons other than MPE or in hospice care
  4. estimated at less than 2 months
  5. Inability to complete questionnaires (English or French)
  6. Refusal to give
  7. Pregnant women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rocket® IPC- Long External Length

    Intervention Rocket® IPC- Long External Length: a regular full length (long catheter) Rocket catheter inserted at baseline, with an external length of 16cm. Catheter length will be modified at 2 weeks in clinic, shortened to an external length of 5cm (short catheter). Patient satisfaction will be collected at 2 weeks prior to the modification, and at 4 weeks when the patient has a shorter catheter. The modification is easily done without any use of anesthesia as it is external to the patient using the tool kit that comes along with the catheter. Patients will be referred to palliative home care services for assistance with drainage. The drainage catheters to be used in this study will be samples supplied by Rocket Medical Inc., for Dr. Amjadi to evaluate their product.

    Device: Rocket® IPC- Long External Length

  • Experimental
    Rocket® IPC- Short External Length

    Intervention Rocket® IPC- Short External Length : a regular full length (long catheter) Rocket catheter inserted at baseline, with an external length of 16cm. Catheter length will be modified at 2 weeks in clinic, shortened to an external length of 5cm (short catheter). Patient satisfaction will be collected at 2 weeks prior to the modification, and at 4 weeks when the patient has a shorter catheter. The modification is easily done without any use of anesthesia as it is external to the patient using the tool kit that comes along with the catheter. Patients will be referred to palliative home care services for assistance with drainage. The drainage catheters to be used in this study will be samples supplied by Rocket Medical Inc., for Dr. Amjadi to evaluate Rocket's product.

    Device: Rocket® IPC- Short External Length

Interventions

  • DeviceRocket® IPC- Long External Length

    Rocket® IPC- Long External Length Intervention. Evaluation of Long and Short External Length Rocket® Pleural Catheters in Terms of Quality of Life, Feasibility and Satisfaction in Patients Being Treated for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions

  • DeviceRocket® IPC- Short External Length

    Rocket® IPC- Short External Length Intervention. Evaluation of Long and Short External Length Rocket® Pleural Catheters in Terms of Quality of Life, Feasibility and Satisfaction in Patients Being Treated for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' self-rated quality of life - change from baseline compared to 2 and 4 weeks post catheter insertion.

    Self-rated QOL at baseline compared to 2 weeks and 4 weeks post catheter insertion. Quality of life will be assessed using the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Evaluation) questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline compared to changes at 2 weeks and 4 weeks post catheter insertion. Questionnaires will be administered at routine medical visits on day O, 14, and 28.

  2. Patients' self-rated quality of life on domains specific to lung cancer-change from baseline compared to 2 and 4 weeks post catheter insertion.

    Self-rated QOL in domains specific to lung cancer will be assessed at baseline compared to 2 weeks and 4 weeks post catheter insertion. Quality of life will be assessed using the validated lung cancer specific EORTC QLQ-LC13 (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life QLQ-LC13 disease specific) questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline compared to changes at 2 weeks and 4 weeks post catheter insertion. Questionnaires will be administered at routine medical visits on day O, 14, and 28.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ease of use of the short versus long Rocket® pleural catheter.

    Ease of use of the short versus long Rocket pleural catheter as reported by the study doctor as well as the hospital and home care nursing staff. Ease of use will be measured using a non-validated questionnaire, which will assess the functionality of the short versus long Rocket® pleural catheter.

    Time frame: Questionnaire will be administered at routine medical visits on day O, 14, and 28.

  2. Feasibility: measured by incidence of complications (adverse events reports)

    Feasibility will be measured by the incidence of complications found in patients using short versus long Rocket® pleural catheters to treat symptoms of MPE as well as hospital and home care nursing staffs' level of satisfaction with the Rocket® catheter. The time to removal of the Rocket catheter will also be followed and complications will be quantified and described based on patients' reporting of adverse events (at 2 week and 4 week medical assessments) and ongoing reports from home care nurses. All complications will be documented, the most clinically relevant include pleural infection and cellulitis, pain, and catheter obstruction and symptomatic loculated effusion.

    Time frame: Complications will be quantified and described based on patients' reporting of adverse events (at 2 week and 4 week medical assessments). Satisfaction with device questionnaires will be administered at routine medical visits on day 0, 14 and 28.

Other outcomes

  1. Levels of Satisfaction with the device

    Levels of satisfaction with the Rocket® catheter will be measured using a non-validated questionnaire which will assess comfort with the short versus long Rocket® pleural catheter.

    Time frame: Satisfaction with device questionnaires will be administered at routine medical visits on day 0, 14 and 28.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ottawa Hospital, General Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Rosalie Labelle, MSc · Contactrolabelle@toh.ca · 613-737-8899
    • Kayvan Amjadi, MD · Principal investigator
    • Pen Li, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2021, 45 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2017
First posted
Jan 19, 2018
StartActual
Mar 7, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Sep 25, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03403855
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2018
Start date
Mar 7, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2020

Study contacts

Rosalie Labelle, MSc
Contact
rolabelle@toh.ca
613-737-8899 ext. 75256
Kayvan Amjadi, MD
principal investigator · Director Interventional Pulmonology, TOH (General Campus)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion