An interventional study of US-MR image fusion-guided PTED and fluoroscopy-guided PTED in Lumbar Herniated Disc, sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-04.
Sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common pathological process leading to spinal surgery. Open discectomy used to be a widespread procedure for surgical treatment for symptomatic LDH. Currently, with rapid progress of endoscopic techniques, several minimal invasive endoscopic surgeries have been developed to perform discectomy. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) a widely used minimal invasive surgical procedures, the effectiveness of which has been proved to be comparable to conventional open discectomy. However, the use of fluoroscopy may be usually required to indirectly visualize pertinent anatomy to achieve an optimal result on radiographs. As we known, increased radiation exposure may be associated with potential stochastic and deterministic adverse events. Therefore, it is important to reduce the radiation dose of practitioners to minimize risk of potential radiation-induced complications.
Ultrasound-MR fusion technique combines the advantages of ultrasound and MR, and overcome the shortcomings of each single imaging method. It provides MR cross-sectional multiplanar images that correspond to the acquired real-time US images, and all images can be displayed simultaneously and in real time according to the angle of the US transducer. US-MR fusion image has been widely used in prostate and liver intervention. However, to our limited knowledge, there is only one research about the application of US-MR fusion image in lumbar spinal surgery.
In this study, a comparative cohort study will be performed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH). We will conduct the study at the 3rd affiliated hospitals of Sun Yat-Sen University.
Two groups of patients will be investigated: patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing US-MR image fusion-guided PTED (US-MR PTED), and fluoroscopy-guided PTED (FL PTED).
The primary outcomes of the study will be radiation exposure and puncture time. Secondary outcomes include fusion efficacy, puncture accuracy, puncture satisfaction of surgeon, comfort of patient and clinical effectiveness.
On the basis of the results of this trial we will, for the first time, have scientific evidence as to the feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
Exclusion Criteria:
US-MR image fusion-guided PTED: the puncture procedure during PTED was performed under the guidance of ultrasound-MR fusion technique.
Procedure: US-MR image fusion-guided PTED
fluoroscopy-guided PTED: the puncture procedure during PTED was performed under the guidance of fluoroscopy.
Procedure: fluoroscopy-guided PTED
patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing US-MR image fusion-guided PTED
patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing fluoroscopy-guided PTED
radiation exposure
dose of radiation exposure
Time frame: during operation
puncture accuracy
the accuracy of puncture position confirmed by fluoroscopy.
Time frame: during operation
puncture satisfaction of surgeon
use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more satisfactory) to evaluate the satisfaction of surgeon during puncture
Time frame: during operation
comfort of patient
use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more comfortable) to evaluate the comfort of patient during puncture
Time frame: during operation
degree of pain
Visual Analog Scales (VAS, scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain)
Time frame: preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
degree of disability
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disability related to pain)
Time frame: preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation
puncture time
the time from the begin of puncture to the confirmation of optimal puncture
Time frame: during operation
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Intervertebral Disc Displacement→
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University