ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06562803Updated Sep 11, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Cytokine Adsorption and Plasma Exchange in Patients With ACLF and Sepsis

An interventional study of double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange and plasma exchange in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure and Sepsis, sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
192
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) complicated by sepsis. The focus is on assessing the impact of the cytokine adsorption column(CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on survival rates, inflammation markers, and organ function to determine its potential value in clinical practice.

The primary research questions are: (1) Does DPCAS+LPE artificial liver therapy improve the 4-week mortality rate in ACLF patients with sepsis? (2) Does it improve the 12-week mortality rate in these patients? Additionally, the study examines the effects of this therapy on APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, vasoactive-inotropic score, MELD scores, and COSSH-ACLF II scores, as well as the cytokine adsorption efficiency of the CA280.

Patients were randomly assigned to either the DPCAS+LPE group or the plasma exchange(PE) group. All patients received artificial liver therapy every other day, for a total of two sessions. Follow-up assessments were conducted before and after each therapy session, as well as at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure
  • Sepsis
03

In context

Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

165 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 192 is above the median of 72 across 95 interventional studies indexed under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.

Browse Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University is the lead sponsor of 133 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between 18 and 70 years with a background of chronic liver disease, regardless of the presence of cirrhosis.
  2. Total (TBIL) > 12 mg/dL.
  3. (INR) ≥ 1.5.
  4. Meeting the diagnostic criteria for sepsis: confirmed or suspected infection, with a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score increase of ≥ 2 points. (5) High inflammatory status: IL-6 > 80 pg/ml.

(6) Diagnosis of sepsis within the past 72 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inherited metabolic liver disease (including Wilson's disease, hereditary hemochromatosis, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency).
  2. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or other .
  3. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  4. Patients with (HIV) infection or other immunodeficiency diseases (including active hematological malignancies, congenital immunodeficiency syndromes, or those currently receiving high-dose systemic therapy).
  5. Unstable phase of cerebrovascular events.
  6. History of organ transplantation.
  7. Patients with irreversible or terminal extrahepatic organ failure that precludes safe extracorporeal circulation or confounds the intervention: ①Terminal , terminal cor pulmonale, brain death, or persistent vegetative state, or Grade IV hepatic encephalopathy. ②Requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) at the time of screening/enrollment. ③Despite adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, and treatment, unable to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg.
  8. count \< 50×10E9/L, severe coagulation disorders (>3.5), or active bleeding.
  9. Known allergies to extracorporeal circulation, hemoperfusion, or other severe allergic history.
  10. Refusal by the patient or their legally authorized representative (LAR) to participate in the study, or sign the form.
  11. Inability to return for regular follow-up visits as planned in the study.
  12. Other conditions that, in the judgment of the researchers, make the patient unsuitable for enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
192 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

    96 patients in this group will receive standard medical treatment, double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE) for two sessions, and plasma exchange(PE) for the third session.

    Device: double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

  • Active comparator
    Plasma exchange

    96 patients in this group will receive standard medical treatment and plasma exchange(PE) for three sessions.

    Other: plasma exchange

Interventions

  • Devicedouble plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange

    Both groups received comprehensive medical treatment, including antiviral therapy, anti-infection treatment, supportive care, symptomatic treatment, and prevention of complications. All patients will initiate ALSS within 48 hours of enrollment, with treatment administered every other day, for a total of three sessions. The experimental group: The first two sessions consisted of a double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE). This involved using a cytokine adsorption column (CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) and a bilirubin adsorption device (BS330,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on the same treatment circuit. DPCAS treatment was performed first, with an adsorption volume of 4500ml to 5000ml over 2 to 3 hours, followed by plasma exchange (PE), with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin being infused. The third treatment was plasma exchange, with the same dosing as in the control group.

  • Otherplasma exchange

    Based on comprehensive medical treatment, the control group received plasma exchange(PE) treatment, where whole blood was processed through a plasma separator (MICROPLAS MPS 07, BELLCO S.R.L., Italy), with a portion of the plasma discarded and replaced with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin.Three sessions of plasma exchange (PE) performed every other day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality rate

    4-week mortality rate

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality rate

    12-week Mortality rate

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Changes in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score from baseline

    The theoretical maximum value of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score(APACHE II score) was 71 points. The higher the score, the higher the risk of death. Patients with more than 15 points were classified as severe, and patients with less than 15 points were classified as non-severe.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks

  3. Changes in sequential organ failure assessment score from baseline

    The theoretical value range of sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) score is 6-24. The higher the score, the worse the prognosis.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks

  4. Changes in vasoactive-inotropic score from baseline

    Vasoactive-Inotropic Score ( VIS ) evaluates cardiac function and the intensity of vasoactive drug therapy in critically ill patients by quantifying the dose of vasoactive and inotropic drugs received by patients. VIS has no special value range. The higher the score, the higher the patient 's dependence on vasoactive drugs.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks

  5. Changes in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score from baseline

    MELD score is now widely used in the prioritization of liver transplantation candidates in many countries. The score range is usually between 6 ( low risk ) and 40 ( high risk ).

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks

  6. Changes in COSSH-ACLF II score from baseline

    COSSH-ACLF II is a prognostic scoring system for hepatitis B virus -related acute-on-chronic liver failure(HBV-ACLF). COSSH-ACLF IIs can significantly divide ACLF patients into three risk groups based on two cutoff values of 7.4 and 8.4 : low-risk group ( \< 7.4 points ), medium-risk group ( 7.4-8.4 points ) and high-risk group ( ≥ 8.4 points ).

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks

  7. Adsorption rates of various cytokines

    Adsorption rates of various cytokines (including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines) after each treatment

    Time frame: Day1

  8. Adsorption rates of lactate

    Adsorption rates of lactate after each treatment

    Time frame: Day1

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study protocol, results and conclusions of this clinical trial will be published at academic conferences or in journals.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: Proposals should be directed to pliang@mail.sysu.edu.cn. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 37 months after the start.

Of 32 interventional studies with no phase under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 37 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2024
First posted
Aug 20, 2024
StartActual
Sep 27, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06562803
Responsible party
Liang Peng (Professor, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2024
Start date
Sep 27, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Liang Peng, Doctor
Contact
pliang@mail.sysu.edu.cn
+8613533978874
Wenxiong Xu, Doctor
Contact
xuwenx@mail.sysu.edu.cn
+8613760783281
Liang Peng, Doctor
principal investigator · Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion