ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03402490Ex-DHFadd-onUpdated Jan 18, 2018

Enhancement of Physical Activity in Elderly Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure by a Motivational Intervention

An interventional study of Motivational interviewing in Diastolic Heart Failure, sponsored by University of Göttingen. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-18.

Sponsored by University of Göttingen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2013, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of our pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptance and efficacy of motivational interviewing (MI) to support elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in maintaining or starting physical activity (PA).

Read the detailed description

Patients discharged from the Ex-DHF trial were recruited from June 2013 to December 2015 and offered participation in a controlled add-on pilot study. The treatment group (n=19) received 5 sessions of MI, each lasting 15-30 min over 6 months to enhance physical activity.

For the first two and the last sessions participants met with the psychologist-counsellor face-to-face for about 45 minutes. The remaining three sessions could be conducted via telephone or face-to-face, depending on participants' preferences, and typically lasted 15-30 minutes. Per study protocol, counsellors (physicians and psychologists trained in motivational interviewing) assisted the participants in: (1) Setting goals for their physical activity; (2) developing a plan to increase physical activities; (3) setting specific plans for the implementation of the plan; and (4) overcoming possible barriers. Participants were also asked to keep track of their daily physical activity in a diary, which counsellors then discussed with them during the sessions.

After patients had given their written informed consent, counsellors assessed all participants via structured interview and self-rating scales. At baseline only, sociodemographic information was recorded.

At baseline and at the final 6-month visit participants' motivation to be physically active in the upcoming weeks was assessed using the SSK-scale ("Sportbezogene Selbstkonkord" = sports-related self-concordance, Seelig and Fuchs 2006) to assess the self concordance of sport- and exercise-related goals.

The kind and extent of patients' daily physical activity was recorded using patient diaries. At baseline and 6 months we also conducted a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test on a bicycle ergometer, in order to assess changes in maximum rate of oxygen consumption during the last 30 seconds before the termination of the exercise (peak oxygen consumption (VO2 [ml/min/kg])) as measure of maximal exercise capacity. Participants also completed the 6-minute walk test on flat surface (6-MWT) as an additional parameter to assess submaximal exercise capacity.

Additionally, at the 6-month assessment, intervention participants filled out a questionnaire about their subjective evaluation of the counseling program.

The control group (n=20) received usual care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diastolic Heart Failure

Keywords

  • Motivational interviewing
  • physical activity
  • feasibility
  • HFpEF
03

In context

Heart Failure, Diastolic

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure, Diastolic; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 48 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure, Diastolic.

Browse Heart Failure, Diastolic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Göttingen is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • preserved left ventricular systolic function ( >= 50%),
  • echocardiographically determined diastolic dysfunction (grade ≥ 1),
  • functional classes I, II or III,
  • at least one cardiovascular risk-factor (overweight, diabetes, hypertension, smoking or hyperlipidemia)
  • participation in Ex-DHF main study
  • written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-cardiac causes for heart failure-like symptoms
  • GOLD stages ≥II
  • Anaemia ( \<11 mg/dL)
  • Significant renal dysfunction ( \<30 mL/min/1.73 m**2 indexed to BSA)
  • Significant peripheral artery disease (Fontaine ≥IIb)
  • Musculoskeletal disease that contributes to reduced exercise performance
  • Specific cardiomyopathy (e.g. amyloidosis)
  • Haemodynamically significant valvular disorders
  • Significant coronary artery disease (current angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class ≥II or positive stress test, myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft within the last 3 months)
  • Any inability or to participate in cardiopulmonary exercise testing or in an exercise programme (e.g. physiological, mental) or to supply essential information (e.g. questionnaire, diary)
  • Ineffective control of resting blood pressure (≥140/90 mmHg or ≥160/100 mmHg with ≥3 antihypertensive drugs) or of resting heart rate (≥100 b.p.m.)
  • Expected low adherence (e.g. by travel distance to trial site; planned absences longer than 4 weeks during follow-up) or ongoing drug abuse
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Concomitant participation in other interventional clinical trials
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motivational interviewing

    Over a time span of 6 months, participants in the intervention group received up to 7 sessions of motivational counseling, lasting 15-30 minutes each, to enhance physical activity.

    Behavioral: Motivational interviewing

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Participants who served as controls received usual care.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational interviewing
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence to intervention

    To evaluate the feasibility of motivational counseling to enhance physical activity patients´ adherence to appointments is assessed as number / percentage of sessions attended

    Time frame: Over 6 month intervention period

  2. Patient acceptance of intervention

    To assess how patients evaluate the Intervention, i.e. receiving motivational counseling, they were asked to fill in evaluation sheets

    Time frame: At 6-month assessment

  3. Effectiveness (peak VO2)

    Changes in the maximal exercise capacity (peak VO2) during a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test on a bicycle ergometer.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6-month assessment

  4. Effectiveness (6-minute walk distance)

    Six-minutes walking distance

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6-month assessment

Other outcomes

  1. Motivation

    Participants' motivation to be physically active was registered using the SSK (Sports-related self-concordance) scale. The self-concordance score is computed by subtracting the sum of the introjected and extrinsic motivation from the sum of the intrinsic and identified motivation subscales, with resulting scores ranging from -10 to +10 (higher value = higher self-concordance)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6-month assessment.

  2. Physical activity

    The kind and extent of patients' daily physical activity was recorded using patient diaries

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6-month assessment.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2013 to primary completion in Dec 2015, 29 months.

Of 39 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, Diastolic, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 57. This study's 29 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 45 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2017
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
StartActual
Jun 18, 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 8, 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 8, 2015
Last update
Jan 18, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03402490
Lead sponsor
University of Göttingen
Collaborators
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)
Responsible party
Christoph Herrmann-Lingen (Prof. Dr., University of Göttingen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
Start date
Jun 18, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2015
Completion
Dec 8, 2015
Last update
Jan 18, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion