CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03396367PARTNERUpdated Oct 29, 2025Results posted

Prevention and Risk: Treatment With a New Emphasis on Relationships

An interventional study of PARTNER and Education Intervention in Adherence, Medication, Risk Reduction and Drug Use, sponsored by Hunter College of City University of New York. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 29 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-29.

Sponsored by Hunter College of City University of New York · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
196
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 29 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This research examines the efficacy of an individually-delivered intervention tailored for YMSM in relationships. The intervention - termed PARTNER - utilizes a brief (4 session) motivational interviewing format to target Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake/adherence, HIV transmission risk behavior, and associated drug use.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to evaluate a individual-focused intervention with an integrated focus on drug use and HIV prevention, including uptake of and adherence to PrEP. The investigators will recruit a sample of 240 partnered individuals.

Recruitment occurs using a mix of in-person and Internet recruitment. Outreach workers will visit bars and events in the New York City area to recruit participants. Also,information on our project will be posted on social media sites (e.g.,Facebook, Grindr, Scruff). Interested individuals will complete a brief online screener to assess eligibility. A telephone screener will be conducted with participants who are preliminarily eligible based upon online screener responses. Participants who are eligible based upon telephone screening responses will be sent an email. The email contains a link for them to access the baseline online survey. It provides information which introduces the study to the recruited partner and a link to the baseline survey online. If participants indicate intimate partner violence (IPV) on the online baseline survey, participants will be rendered ineligible. Only the participant that indicated experiencing IPV will be given a list of local referrals to access IPV-related services.

An in-person baseline assessment appointment will be scheduled after both participants have completed the online survey.

The in-person baseline assessment appointment consists of four components; written consent, a computer-assisted self interview (CASI), a timeline follow back interview, and biological testing.

Written consent is obtained prior to the start of any in-person baseline activity. Participants additionally complete a computer-assisted self interview (CASI). After this, participants will independently complete a TFLB. TLFB is a semi-structured interview to collect retrospective event-level data on drug use, sexual behavior and PrEP adherence (for those on PrEP) in the past 30 days.

The final part of the in-person baseline assessment consists of biological testing for STI (gonorrhea \& chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs), drug testing via 5-panel fingernail drug assay via finger or toe nail clippings. Drugs tested are 5 major drugs: Amphetamines, Cannabinoids, Cocaine, Opiates, and Phencyclidine (PCP). HIV testing will consist of a finder prick test using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay. Participants indicating current PrEP give an additional blood sample and fingernail sample to examine PrEP adherence using a dried blood spot for western blot analysis and fingernail assay.

After the baseline assessment, participants will be randomized to receive their first PARTNER or Education session, of which will occur immediately following their baseline assessment.

The study will employ a stratified randomization procedure using an algorithm via Qualtrics. Participants will be randomized using three couple-level criteria as reported by the participant. Participants will be randomized based on relationship length difference (less than 2 years versus 2 or more), age difference (less than 3 years versus 3 or more), racial difference (both white versus all others combinations), PrEP use (Participant reports current PrEP use versus does not report current use).

Each of the intervention arms consists of 4 sessions that occur once a week for four consecutive weeks.

All participants complete a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow ups. At the 3 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use. For participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.

At the 6 month follow up month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use, biological testing for STI (gonorrhea \& chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs) and HIV testing using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay Also, for participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.

At the 9 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use. For participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.

At final assessment (12 month follow up post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use, biological testing for STI (gonorrhea \& chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs) and HIV testing using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay Also, for participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adherence, Medication
  • Risk Reduction
  • Drug Use
  • Sex, Anal
  • HIV/AIDS

Keywords

  • Relationships
  • YMSM
  • HIV/AIDS
  • PrEP
  • Drug Use
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 29 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 to 29 years of age (inclusive);
  • Main partner must be aged 18 or older.
  • Must be in a main partner relationship with another male (duration ≥ 1 months);
  • HIV-negative serostatus (confirmed by rapid test);
  • Recent (past 30 day) use of at least one of the substances identified as most commonly used by YMSM (marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin or other opiates, MDMA, psychedelics, GHB, and/or ketamine);
  • Sexual behavior meeting CDC criteria for PrEP candidacy (TRB with a casual partner in the past 30 days or TRB with a non-monogamous or serodiscordant main partner).
  • Participants must reside in the NYC metro area
  • Ability to communicate in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable, serious psychiatric symptoms (assessed by the Psychotic Disorder subsection of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV);
  • Current suicidal/homicidal ideation;
  • Evidence of gross cognitive impairment (a score of \<24 on the mini-mental state examination)
  • A history of severe physical or sexual Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) victimization in the current relationship in which participants report not currently feeling "safe" in their relationship and/or coerced to participate in the study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
196 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PARTNER Intervention

    This intervention is a four-session intervention designed to increase PrEP uptake, increase PrEP adherence, and reduce drug use and HIV transmission risk behaviors of individuals in relationships.

    Behavioral: PARTNER

  • Active comparator
    Education Intervention

    This intervention is a four-session intervention that discussed drug use and its effect on physiological social functioning.

    Behavioral: Education Intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralPARTNER

    The PATRNER intervention addresses, drug use, PrEP uptake/adherence, and HIV transmission risk by enhancing communication skills by integrating motivational interviewing and video-based communication skills training.

  • BehavioralEducation Intervention

    The Education intervention consists of a 4-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Illicit Drug Use Days

    The self-reported number of illicit drug use days (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month

  2. Cannabis Use Days

    The self-reported number of cannabis drug use days in the past 30 days

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month

  3. Number (Proportion) of Participants Who Report Sexual HIV Transmission Risk With Casual Partners

    The percentage of participants in each condition reporting sexual HIV transmission risk with a casual partner (any condomless sex with a casual partner in the absence of PrEP).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month

  4. The Number (Proportion) of Participants Reporting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake

    The percentage participants in each condition who report having a current PrEP prescription at the time of follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month,

06

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePartner InterventionEducation Intervention
Started94102
Completed94102
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIllicit Drug Use Days

The self-reported number of illicit drug use days (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month
Reported as:
Mean · days
Illicit Drug Use Days
daysPartner InterventionEducation Intervention
Baseline1.49 ± 5.37.80 ± 2.14
3-month1.16 ± 3.830.83 ± 2.3
6-month.67 ± 1.79.56 ± 1.29
9-month1.08 ± 3.62.81 ± 2.30
12-month.66 ± 1.49.67 ± 1.55
Statistical analysis
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .433 (Condition (referent = education control).) · Slope: .372 · 95% CI -.558 to 1.302Variable:
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .749 · Slope: -.017 · 95% CI -.121 to .087Variable: Communication Compentence
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .302 · Slope: .073 · 95% CI -.121 to .087Moderating Variable: Communication Competence by Condition
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .799 · Slope: .027 · 95% CI -.182 to .236Variable: Relationship Satisfaction
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .173 · Slope: -.211 · 95% CI -.514 to .092Moderating Variable: Relationship Satisfaction by Condition
PrimaryCannabis Use Days

The self-reported number of cannabis drug use days in the past 30 days

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month
Reported as:
Mean · days
Cannabis Use Days
daysPartner InterventionEducation Intervention
Baseline9.68 ± 11.257.59 ± 10.64
3-Month9.28 ± 11.587.49 ± 10.33
6-Month9.13 ± 11.637.27 ± 10.39
9-Month10.04 ± 12.246.88 ± 10.73
12-Month10.04 ± 12.556.61 ± 10.64
Statistical analysis
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .172 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at baseline.) · Slope: .427 · 95% CI -.186 to 1.04
  • Partner Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .054 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up.) · Slope: -.281 · 95% CI -.623 to .061
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .036 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups.) · Slope: 0.125 · 95% CI -.011 to .260
PrimaryNumber (Proportion) of Participants Who Report Sexual HIV Transmission Risk With Casual Partners

The percentage of participants in each condition reporting sexual HIV transmission risk with a casual partner (any condomless sex with a casual partner in the absence of PrEP).

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number (Proportion) of Participants Who Report Sexual HIV Transmission Risk With Casual Partners
ParticipantsPartner InterventionEducation Intervention
Baseline1616
3-Month810
6-Month55
9-Month66
12-Month1112
Statistical analysis
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .679 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at baseline.) · Slope: .245 · 95% CI -.913 to 1.403
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .359 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up.) · Slope: -.301 · 95% CI -1.938 to 1.336
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .431 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups.) · Slope: .048 · 95% CI -.496 to .593
PrimaryThe Number (Proportion) of Participants Reporting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake

The percentage participants in each condition who report having a current PrEP prescription at the time of follow-up.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month,
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number (Proportion) of Participants Reporting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake
ParticipantsPartner InterventionEducation Intervention
Baseline5058
3-Month4251
6-Month5047
9-Month5245
12-Month4346
Statistical analysis
  • Partner Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .326 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at baseline.) · Slope: -1.251 · 95% CI -3.814 to 1.311
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .384 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up.) · Slope: .246 · 95% CI -1.383 to 1.875
  • Partner Intervention vs Education Intervention · Latent Growth Curve · p = .019 (A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups.) · Slope: .856 · 95% CI .052 to 1.659

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PARTNER Intervention0/94 (0%)0/94 (0%)0/94 (0%)
Education Intervention0/102 (0%)0/102 (0%)0/102 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Mean26.8 ± 2.827 ± 2.826.9 ± 2.8
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Cisgender Male94102196
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
White5347100
Black or African American6511
Latino or Hispanic233154
Asian, Pacific Islander61016
Multiracial or another identity6915
Sexual Identity
Sexual Identity(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Gay7088158
Bisexual10818
Queer or another Identity13518
unknown112
Region of Residence
Region of Residence(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Northeast8395178
Elsewhere in the US11718
Education
Education(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Less than a 4 year degree192443
4 year degree or higher7477151
unknown112
PrEP status
PrEP status(Participants)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Not taking PrEP444488
Current PrEP perscription5058108
Interpersonal Communication Communication Competence Scale
Interpersonal Communication Communication Competence Scale(units on a scale)Partner InterventionEducation InterventionTotal
Mean43.3 ± 5.944.4 ± 5.943.8 ± 5.9

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hunter College- City University of New York
    New York, New York 10018, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Parsons JT, Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Botsko M, Golub SA. A randomized controlled trial utilizing motivational interviewing to reduce HIV risk and drug use in young gay and bisexual men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):9-18. doi: 10.1037/a0035311. Epub 2013 Dec 23. PubMed 24364800 ↗
  • Starks TJ, Robles G, Pawson M, Jimenez RH, Gandhi M, Parsons JT, Millar BM. Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Drug Use and HIV Incidence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in Relationships and Are High Priority for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Project PARTNER): Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 4;8(7):e13015. doi: 10.2196/13015. PubMed 31274114 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 1, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Dec 5, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03396367
Lead sponsor
Hunter College of City University of New York
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Tyrel Starks (Professor of Psychology, Hunter College of City University of New York) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2018
Start date
Feb 14, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 21, 2024
Completion
Feb 21, 2024
Results posted
Oct 29, 2025
Last update
Oct 29, 2025

Study contacts

Tyrel J Starks, PhD
principal investigator · Hunter College of City University of New York

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion