ClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT03381677POSTUpdated Aug 3, 2020

Pedicle Osteotomy for Stenosis Trial

An interventional study of Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy with Altum® Device and Control in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1 and Neurogenic Claudication, sponsored by Innovative Surgical Designs. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-03.

Sponsored by Innovative Surgical Designs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was suspended
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on clinical trials
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
344
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 151 studies in Spinal Stenosis with a site in United States — 27 open to participants now, 32 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Spinal Stenosis · United States.

Planned enrollment
9th of 110
344 · median 60
Started
2017
with 13 others
No phase
68 of 151
7 open now
Registered
87th of 151
by date

Among the 151 studies in Spinal Stenosis with a site in United States, this one is the 9th largest by planned enrollment of the 110 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 14 that started in 2017, is one of 68 with no phase, and was the 87th registered.

Spinal Stenosis

458 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 105 are open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Open to participants now

27 of the 151 studies in Spinal Stenosis with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

22 more — sign in →

All 27 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 66 Spinal Stenosis studies recruiting now, 30 (45%) set no upper age limit and 9 (14%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 6 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 151 studies in Spinal Stenosis with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a pivotal Randomized Clinical trial to compare the safety and effectiveness of the Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy Procedure with implantation of the Altum® Device to open surgical decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) in patients with symptomatic, one or two level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and one level grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis requiring surgical treatment.

Read the detailed description

LSS is a narrowing of the spinal canal and/or the intervertebral foramina by bony spurs or soft tissues that decrease space for the neural elements resulting in compression of the nerve roots or spinal cord in the lumbar region of the spine. LSS can cause low back pain, weakness, numbness, and pain and loss of sensation in the buttocks and legs. In most cases the symptoms improve when the patient is sitting or leaning forward, due to the flexed position of the vertebra which leads to reduced impingement of the neural tissue. In addition, many patients with LSS complain of pain when standing and walking referred to as neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC). Nonsurgical management is well-established as the first-line treatment approach for LSS patients with mild to moderate symptoms. It typically involves the prescription of modified physical activity, physiotherapy, anti-inflammatory drugs, epidural steroid injections, use of a lumbar corset or some combination thereof.

Surgical treatment is reserved for patients who do not obtain adequate relief of symptoms by conservative management. The goal of surgical treatment for LSS is to relieve the compression of the spinal nerves in the spinal canal or neural foramina. Such decompressive surgery generally involves laminectomy, laminotomy, foraminotomy, partial facetectomy or some combination thereof. Decompressive surgery in subjects with LSS and spondylolisthesis commonly requires fusion to stabilize the spondylolisthesis. The most commonly performed lumbar fusion for patient's with the combination of LSS and spondylolisthesis is a Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) which involves stabilizing the motion segment by placing pedicle screws, rods and an interbody fusion cage. Autograft or allograft bone are commonly used to bring about fusion or a bridging of bone across the intervertebral joint.

The Altum® Pedicle Osteotomy System contains the implants and instruments required to perform the pedicle lengthening osteotomy procedure for the treatment of LSS. The Altum® implant is an expandable bone screw that is available in a variety of sizes (7.5 mm, 8.5 mm and 9.5 mm). Altum® instruments are manufactured from IXEF PARA GS-1022 GY/51, medical grade titanium alloy (Ti 6AL-4V ELI ASTM F-136), and medical grade stainless steel (17-4 ASTM F899).

03

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1
  • Neurogenic Claudication

Keywords

  • pedicle lengthening osteotomy
  • spinal stenosis
  • decompression
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Is a male or female patient between 40 and 80 years of age.
  2. Has the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar region (defined as L2-L5), defined by one or more of the following: a) narrowingof the mid-sagittal spinal canal (central stenosis), b) narrowing between the facet superior articular process (SAP) and the posterior intervertebral disc margin (lateral recess stenosis), c) narrowing of the nerve root foraminal canal(s) (foraminal stenosis) and has, at the same level, radiographic confirmation on plain lateral flexion/extension radiographs of a degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis at the same level, defined as at least 1% but not greater than 25%, offset between the posterior margins of the adjacent vertebral bodies at the index level.
  3. Neurogenic claudication or radiculopathic symptoms including leg pain, muscle weakness, and/or sensation abnormality, with or without back pain, which is worse with extended posture and relieved by flexion, as evidenced by patient history.
  4. Has pain in the leg and/or buttock that is worse with standing as compared to sitting.
  5. Has radiographic confirmation on CT or MRI of moderate or greater lumbar spinal stenosis at the index level defined as > 25% reduction in area of the central and/or lateral recess and/or foraminal regions of the spinal canal as compared to the adjacent level.
  6. Has radiographic confirmation on CT or MRI of compression of the thecal sac and/or cauda equina and/or nerve root(s) due to hypertrophy of the facet joints and/or ligamentum flavum thickening/buckling
  7. Has undergone a 6 month or longer course of conservative therapy without sufficient relief of symptoms that has included one or more of the following interventions: physical therapy, bracing, systemic and/or injected medications.
  8. Has moderate or greater impairment on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Physical Function scale (PF) defined as a score of 2 or greater.
  9. Has moderate or greater impairment on the Oswestry Disability Index defined as a score of 30 or greater.
  10. Is a surgical candidate for lumbar decompressive surgery at one or two levels in the L2 through L5 region of the spine.
  11. Is psychosocially, mentally and physically able to comply with all study procedures required by the study protocol including attending all scheduled visits and interventions.
  12. Is able to provide voluntary, to participate in the clinical trial and has signed the informed consent documents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has had prior spinal surgery at any level between L1 and S1.
  2. Requires more than 2 lumbar levels of surgical decompression.
  3. Has a degenerative spondylolisthesis of greater than grade I defined as greater than 25% offset between the posterior margins of adjacent vertebral bodies on plain lateral flexion/extension radiographs or does not have a grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis, defined as 0% offset between the posterior margins of adjacent vertebral bodies on a plain lateral flexion/extension radiograph.
  4. Has more than one level of degenerative spondylolisthesis or has spondylolisthesis located at lumbar levels which are not treated with surgical decompression. Has the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy.
  5. Has a complete motor or sensory deficit.
  6. Has a pars defect.
  7. Has facet joints at the implant level that are absent or fractured.
  8. Has lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of greater than 25o.
  9. Has a disc herniation at any lumbar level requiring surgical intervention.
  10. Has symptomatic hip arthritis or hip pain.
  11. Has a (BMI) of greater than 40.
  12. Has a known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys.
  13. Has osteoporosis. The SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation) will be used to screen subjects who require DEXA; Subjects with T-score \< -2.5 (per The World Health Organization definition) will be excluded.
  14. Has a history of Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease.
  15. Has a history of rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic disease.
  16. Requires medications or drugs known to interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (e.g., chronic systemic ). Corticosteroids used for 6 weeks or less are not an exclusion criteria.
  17. Has insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
  18. Has cauda equina syndrome, defined as neural compression in the lumbar spine causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or neurogenic bladder (bladder retention or incontinence) dysfunction.
  19. Only has axial back pain with no leg or buttock pain.
  20. Has back or leg pain of unknown etiology.
  21. Has evidence or the diagnosis of significant peripheral vascular disease (e.g. diminished or absent dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial pulses)
  22. The patient currently has any of the following: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, major psychotic disorder, and substance or alcohol abuse or dependency as defined by the DSM V.
  23. Has participated in a clinical trial of another drug or device within the past 2 years.
  24. Has an active, chronic infection, either systemic or local.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
344 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy

    Lumbar decompressive surgery via Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy Procedure with the Altum® Device

    Device: Pedicle Lengthening Osteotomy with Altum® Device

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Decompressive surgery via open surgical decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) using either a midline or paramedian incision with implantation of bilateral pedicle screws (4 screws) and rods (2 rods) and an interbody fusion cage (1 PEEK fusion cage, coated or uncoated): 1. DePuy Synthes Expedium® 5.5 System, Stryker Xia 5.5 System, Medtronic CD Horizon Solera 5.5 Systemor Innovative Surgical Designs True Spinal Fixation System; and 2. DePuy Synthes Concord TLIF cage, Stryker UniLIF TLIF cage, Medtronic Capstone TLIF cage or Meditech Talos TLIF cage.

    Device: Control

Interventions

  • DevicePedicle Lengthening Osteotomy with Altum® Device

    Decompressive surgery via Pedicle lengthening osteotomy using Altum Device. Altum is intended for pedicle lengthening to correct degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the presence of a grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The Altum bone saw is designed for creating an osteotomy at the base of each pedicle. The Altum implant is designed for distraction of the pedicle osteotomy and for lengthening of the pedicles. Altum is appropriate for skeletally mature adults with symptomatic stenosis at one or two levels between L2-L5.

  • DeviceControl

    Decompressive surgery via open surgical decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) using either a midline or paramedian incision with implantation of bilateral pedicle screws (4 screws) and rods (2 rods) and an interbody fusion cage (1 PEEK fusion cage, coated or uncoated): 1. DePuy Synthes Expedium® 5.5 System, Stryker Xia 5.5 System, Medtronic CD Horizon Solera 5.5 Systemor Innovative Surgical Designs True Spinal Fixation System; and 2. DePuy Synthes Concord TLIF cage, Stryker UniLIF TLIF cage, Medtronic Capstone TLIF cage or Meditech Talos TLIF cage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)

    Clinically significant improvement in outcomes ZCQ scores compared to baseline * Improvement in physical function by \> 0.5 points * Improvement in symptom severity by \> 0.5 points * "Satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" as defined by a score of \< 2.5 points on the patient satisfaction domain

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. No reoperations

    No re-operations, removals, revisions or supplemental fixation at the index level.

    Time frame: Index level

  3. Adjacent level surgery

    No additional surgery at the adjacent levels

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Adverse events

    No major device-related adverse events

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Radiological Success

    Presence of continuous bridging bone across both pedicle osteotomy sites on CT scanning, * No evidence of bridging bone between the upper and lower vertebral endplates on CT scanning, and evidence of continued motion as demonstrated on flexion-extension films * Absence of a major device related adverse event (device breakage, disassembly or migration)

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index v2.1a \> 15 points from baseline to 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. EQ5D

    Change in EQ5D from baseline to 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. SF-12

    Change in SF-12v2.0™ from baseline to 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Back and Leg

    Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a 100mm line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Patients mark a line on the scale depicting their pain level. A VAS score is determined by measuring where the mark is made relative to the ends of the line. VAS will be done separately for low back, right leg and left leg pain.Improvement in VAS for back, right leg and left leg pain of 20/100mm from baseline to 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Cost

    Direct costs of the episode of care

    Time frame: Index surgery

  6. Opioid use

    Use of opioid analgesics

    Time frame: baseline to 24 months

  7. Return to work

    Patient will report the date of which they return to work

    Time frame: Anytime from discharge after surgery up to 24 months (+/- 60 days)

  8. Daily activities

    Time for return to usual daily activities

    Time frame: baseline to 24 months

  9. Patient Satisfaction

    A series of questions intended to assess the effects of the procedure itself on your well-being, and does not refer to the hospital or its staff. One out of 5 statements will be chosen based on the patient's level of satisfaction: The procedure results met my expectations and I feel better than I did before surgery; The procedure improved my condition enough that I would go through it again for the same outcome; The procedure helped me but I would not go through it again for the same outcome; I feel the same or worse compared to before surgery. Furthermore, patients will be ask to choose one statement based on how they feel today compared to their last visit: I feel much better; I feel somewhat better; I feel somewhat worse; I feel much worse.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rothman Institute
    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2022, 60 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2017
First posted
Dec 22, 2017
StartActual
Oct 26, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Oct 26, 2022
CompletionEst.
Oct 26, 2024
Last update
Aug 3, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03381677
Lead sponsor
Innovative Surgical Designs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2017
Start date
Oct 26, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 26, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2020

Study contacts

Jon Rinehart
study director · Sponsor GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion