CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06140927Updated May 7, 2025

Effect of Ketamine on Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ketamine in Spine Fusion, Spine Tumor and Spinal Stenosis, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-07.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effect of ketamine on intraoperative motor evoked potentials in adult patients undergoing thoracolumbar spinal fusions. Participants will undergo a standard anesthetic. In addition to the standard anesthetic, the patients will be administered increasing doses of ketamine with motor-evoked potentials being measured at each dose, to assess any impacts.

Read the detailed description

Spinal surgeries continue to increase in frequency and complexity. An important safety protocol is the use of intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEP) to monitor the integrity and function of the spinal cord and alert the surgeon of any potential injury. Transcranial electric motor evoked potentials stimulate the motor cortex and produce a myogenic response. This modality can assess the function of all pathways including the motor cortex, the lateral corticospinal tracts, the function of the alpha motor neurons, and peripheral nerves.

Various anesthetic agents can impact the critical parameters of MEPs. Inhaled volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide are highly suppressive in a dose-dependent manner decreasing the amplitude of the myogenic response and prolonging the latency. Propofol is also suppressive of MEPs, although high quality data can still be obtained at clinically relevant doses for anesthesia. For this reason, most anesthesiologists will use propofol as the backbone of any anesthetic that involves neurophysiologic monitoring.

Because spine surgeries are exceptionally painful, anesthesiologists will often incorporate adjuncts that can decrease pain and postoperative opioid usage. The effect of these adjuncts on intraoperative evoked potentials is incompletely described and important work remains to detail these effects.

Ketamine, a phencyclidine derivative that is an NMDA receptor antagonist, is a widely used adjunct anesthetic due to its analgesic and hypnotic properties during spine surgeries. Ketamine has shown significant opioid-sparing and analgesic benefits when used in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), including motor evoked potentials (MEP), are increasingly used during spinal surgeries to help identify potentially reversible injury to neural structures.

The literature is full of conflicting and poor quality data regarding the effect of adding ketamine to an anesthetic and the effects on MEPs. Therefore, the investigators' goal is to help characterize the effects of this commonly used medication on a critical safety monitor for procedures involving the spinal cord.

The summation of excitation of spinal ventral horn neurons is thought to contribute to the myogenic response during transcranial motor evoked potentials. Because ketamine can inhibit N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated glutaminergic activity, it has the potential to inhibit this summation process and interfere with IONM. Despite this theoretical potential to interfere with IONM, ketamine is widely and successfully used during spinal surgeries. There are conflicting reports about the use of higher doses during surgery.

Prior studies have shown that moderate doses of ketamine have little to no effect on MEPs, and so for years the received wisdom was that ketamine is a benign agent, and is safe to using during spinal procedures utilizing IONM. However, following up on a case report, a group reported that even higher doses of ketamine may be able to dose dependently suppress MEPs. It is difficult to explain the differences between these reports, and it may be partially attributable to differences in neuromonitoring techniques/practices. These results are also interesting, because there is some suggestions in the community that it could be beneficial to run substantially higher doses of ketamine intraoperatively, using it not just as an opioid sparing adjunct, but more as a substantial contributor to the overall anesthestic state. The logic has been that ketamine, as opposed to propofol (the current foundation of an anesthetic compatible with IONM) has benign effects on MEPs and can reduce postoperative pain. However, if higher doses of ketamine can suppress MEPs, this change in anesthetic technique may not be warranted.

Protocol:

Main Visit: Patients will receive general anesthesia in the usual fashion for the indicated procedures. This anesthetic will be standardized between patients. The patients will also have the necessary equipment for neuromonitoring placed. This equipment is placed identically for patients who are or are not in our study, and the investigators will not add any additional monitors. All patients participating in the study will have neuromonitoring as part of their spine surgery as standard care. Baseline motor-evoked potential data will then be collected. This baseline data is also standard practice and not a study-specific procedure. After the baseline data is collected patients will then be administered a bolus of ketamine 0.1mg/kg followed by an infusion of 3mcg/kg/min to maintain steady-state plasma levels. After 5 min to allow equilibration, a new set of baseline MEP data will be acquired. This process takes approximately 5 minutes. The investigators will also collect a blood specimen at this time to measure the ketamine plasma level. The investigators will then administer an additional bolus of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine and increase the infusion to 15 mcg/kg/min to maintain steady-state plasma levels. The investigators will repeat the acquisition of baseline MEP data and a blood sample. Finally, the investigators will administer an additional bolus of 0.85 mg/kg of ketamine and increase the infusion to 50 mcg/kg/min to maintain steady-state plasma levels. The investigators will repeat the acquisition of baseline MEP data and a blood sample. Thereafter, the surgery will commence following usual anesthetic care at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. This dosing scheme is designed to mimic the steady-state plasma concentrations that would result from administering an infusion of 3mcg/kg/min, 15mcg/kg/min, and 50mcg/kg/min for prolonged periods of time. A commercial application for predicting plasma concentrations was used to calculate these doses.

General Demographic Data: Data including age, sex, race, and preoperative comorbid conditions will be collected. These data will be obtained by review of the patient's medical record.

Ketamine Plasma Levels: Blood samples will be collected by research personnel after each dose increase of ketamine and at the time the MEP data is obtained.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spine Fusion
  • Spine Tumor
  • Spinal Stenosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

459 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 283 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (>18 years of age) undergoing posterior spinal fusions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sensitivity or allergy to ketamine.
  • Schizophrenia or other psychotic conditions
  • Uncontrolled hypertension with systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Large vascular aneurysms
  • Patients on ketamine as outpatient therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine

    All subjects will be in a single arm. Patients will serve as their own control. Patients will receive general anesthesia in the usual fashion for the indicated procedures. This anesthetic will be standardized between patients. All patients participating in the study will have neuromonitoring as part of their spine surgery as standard care. Baseline motor-evoked potential data will then be collected. Then study drug Ketamine will be administered as following: * Step 1: 0.1 mg/kg bolus over 30 sec followed by infusion of 3mcg/kg/min (0.18 mg/kg/hr) * Step 2: 0.3 mg/kg bolus over 30 sec followed by infusion of 15mcg/kg/min (0.9mg/kg/hr) * Step 3: 0.85 mg/kg bolus over 30 sec followed by infusion at 50mcg/kg/min (3mg/kg/hr) Motor Evoked Potentials will be collected for 5 times at minutes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 after drug step.

    Drug: Ketamine

Interventions

  • DrugKetamine

    Patients will be administered ketamine at increasing doses followed by measurements of motor-evoked potentials.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in threshold motor evoked potentials (MEP) in response to intraoperative ketamine administration

    MEP helps to monitor the integrity and function of the spinal cord and alert the surgeon of any potential injury during the spine surgery. MEP amplitude will be measured at each of 3 ketamine doses and compared to baseline. The measurements will be at each dose change of ketamine approximately 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the start of the ketamine infusions.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  2. Change in supramaximal motor evoked potentials (MEP) in response to intraoperative ketamine administration

    MEP helps to monitor the integrity and function of the spinal cord and alert the surgeon of any potential injury during the spine surgery. MEP amplitude will be measured at each of 3 ketamine doses and compared to baseline. The measurements will be at each dose change of ketamine approximately 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the start of the ketamine infusions.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  3. Change in motor evoked potentials (MEP) facilitation in response to intraoperative ketamine administration

    MEP helps to monitor the integrity and function of the spinal cord and alert the surgeon of any potential injury during the spine surgery. MEP amplitude will be measured at each of 3 ketamine doses and compared to baseline. The measurements will be at each dose change of ketamine approximately 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the start of the ketamine infusions.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ketamine Plasma Level

    Ketamine Plasma levels will be measured at each of 3 ketamine doses.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The investigators will not plan to share IPD with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06140927
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2025

Study contacts

Marc Buren, MD
Contact
marc.buren@ucsf.edu
4154768369
Marc Buren, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion