ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03377504Updated Feb 25, 2020

Clinical Evaluation of the Effects of Mirror Therapy in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1

An interventional study of mirror therapy and Routine physical therapy and exercise program in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I, sponsored by Ankara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-25.

Sponsored by Ankara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Dec 2017).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey — 7 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Complex Regional Pain Syndromes · Turkey.

Enrollment
9th of 10
36 · median 48
Started
2017
the only one that year
No phase
10 of 14
6 open now
Registered
1st of 14
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 14
Ankara University

Among the 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 10 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 1st registered.

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 54 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies recruiting now, 17 (44%) set no upper age limit and 16 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

CRPS Type 1 can occur after traumas, surgical applications or central nervous system disorders. The triggering factor in CRPS type 1 is fracture in about half of the cases. Mirror therapy is an innovative treatment approach that is cheap, easy to administer and non-invasive. It is thought that this treatment may be complementary to other rehabilitation methods.Neurophysiologic effects of mirror therapy are noted in the brain, especially in the parietal region, cerebellum, basal ganglia and premotor cortex. Mirror therapy is also effective through the mirror neuron system. Mirror therapy triggers neuroplasticity by increasing the connection between neurons in the brain and thereby enhances communication between the motor and the sensory cortex. Recent studies have shown the positive effects of mirror therapy in patients with CRPS Type 1 disease. There are two randomized controlled trials showing the efficacy of mirror therapy in patients with CRPS Type 1 after stroke. Only one pilot study was performed in patients with CRPS Type 1 who were traumatic origin. There are no randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of mirror therapy in CRPS Type 1 patients who developed secondary to trauma in the literature. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effects of mirror therapy applied in addition to routine rehabilitation program in patients with traumatic CRPS Type 1. The investigators hypothesized that adjunctive mirror therapy to classical rehabilitation program would result in better outcomes compared with the classical program only.

Read the detailed description

This study is planned as a prospective randomized single blind controlled study. It was approved by the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study will include 36 patients with CRPS type 1 who are referred to the Depart-ment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hand Rehabilitation Unit at the Medical Faculty of Ankara University. Patients included in the scope of the study will randomly be divided into 2 groups as mirror group and control group. Random allocation software (RAS) program will be used to assign the patients to the treatment groups with "block randomization" method and to create the randomization scheme. In this single blinded study, all patients will be evaluated by the same physician (Dr. Elif Can Ozdemir). The physician will be blind to patient's assignment. Routine physical therapy and exercise program including contrast baths, hot pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), desensitization, exercises and occupational therapy will be applied to all patients for a total of 4 weeks, 5 days a week, 1 hour/day. Mirror therapy will be applied to the mirror group for 30 minutes per day in addition to this routine treatment. Mirror therapy will include wrist flexion/extension, ulnar/radial deviation, hand finger flexion/extension and ab-duction/adduction, thumb abduction/adduction/opposition, and forearm supina-tion/pronation movements as well as various object grasping activities according to the status of the patient's hand functions. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be given to each patient. The therapy will be given by the physiotherapists in the Hand Rehabilitation Unit. All individuals participating in the study will be assessed before and immediately after the treatment and also 1 month at follow-up. Each assessment will include pain severity, grip strength, lateral pinch strength, hand circumference measurements, hand dexterity, hand function in daily living activities, and health-related quality of life.As the primary outcome variable, the difference in pain measured by the Numerical Rating Scale between baseline and post-treatment is based. In the mirror group, at least 1 point difference in pain according to the control group is evaluated by Mann Whitney U test and it is necessary to take a total of 36 patients with 81% power and 5% error in each group, assuming 1 as the group standard deviation. Mann Whitney U and Wilcoxon test are planned for paired samples. P value of less than .05 is considered as statistically significant.

03

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Keywords

  • complex regional pain syndrome
  • mirror therapy
  • rehabilitation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult individuals over 18 years of age
  • CRPS type 1 diagnosis according to 2003 Budapest diagnostic criteria
  • Patients who developed CRPS Type 1 due to traumatic causes (surgical procedures, fractures, immobilization)
  • Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with peripheral nerve injuries (those with a diagnosis of CRPS type 2 according to Budapest criteria)
  • Patients with CRPS Type 1 after central nervous system injury (stroke)
  • Patients in the acute and post-acute rehabilitation who have had primary or secondary tendon repair of the hand
  • The presence of comorbid conditions (e.g. decompensated heart failure, chronic renal insufficiency, ) that would impair the functioning of the person and the health-related quality of life
  • The presence of comorbid disease affecting hand function (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or other inflammatory diseases that cause hand involvement)
  • Patients with acute deep venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis of the upper extremity
  • Patients with arterial / venous injury and / or undergoing arterial revascularization
  • Patients with excessive alcohol and inappropriate opioid use
  • Patients with untreated psychiatric problems (major depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, etc.)
  • Patients with recurrent CRPS Type 1
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mirror group

    Routine physical therapy and exercise program will be applied to all patients for a total of 4 weeks, 5 days a week, 1 hour/day. Mirror therapy will be applied to the mirror group for 30 minutes per day in addition to this routine treatment.

    Behavioral: mirror therapy

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Routine physical therapy and exercise program will be applied to all patients for a total of 4 weeks, 5 days a week, 1 hour/day. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be given to each patient.

    Behavioral: Routine physical therapy and exercise program

Interventions

  • Behavioralmirror therapy

    Mirror therapy will include wrist flexion/extension, ulnar/radial deviation, hand finger flexion/extension and abduction/adduction, thumb abduction/adduction/opposition, and forearm supination/pronation movements as well as various object grasping activities according to the status of the patient's hand functions.

  • BehavioralRoutine physical therapy and exercise program

    Routine physical therapy and exercise program including contrast baths, hot pack, TENS, desensitization, exercises and occupational therapy will be applied to all patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain severity

    "0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)" will be used to assess current pain severity. 0 points minimum 10 points indicates the maximum value. Low scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Grip strength

    The Jamar dynamometer will be used to measure the grip strength. The best result of the 3 sequential measurements will be taken into account

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  2. Lateral pinch strength

    A pinchmeter will be used to measure the lateral pinch strength. The best result of the 3 sequential measurements will be taken into account.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  3. Hand circumference measurements

    Two measurements will be made: one at the level of ulnar styloid process, second at the level of the third distal metacarpal tip

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  4. Hand dexterity

    Moberg pick up test will be used.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  5. Hand function in daily living activities

    Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) will be used.0 points minimum 90 points shows the maximum value. Low scores are associated with better clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  6. Health-related quality of life

    The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) will be used

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, İbn-i Sina Research and Application Hospital
    Ankara, 06030, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schwenkreis P, Maier C, Tegenthoff M. Functional imaging of central nervous system involvement in complex regional pain syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1279-84. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1630. Epub 2009 Apr 22. PubMed 19386737 ↗
  • Maihofner C, Seifert F, Markovic K. Complex regional pain syndromes: new pathophysiological concepts and therapies. Eur J Neurol. 2010 May;17(5):649-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02947.x. Epub 2010 Feb 18. PubMed 20180838 ↗
  • Swart CM, Stins JF, Beek PJ. Cortical changes in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Eur J Pain. 2009 Oct;13(9):902-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.11.010. Epub 2008 Dec 19. PubMed 19101181 ↗
  • Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377-86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0058. PubMed 8637922 ↗
  • Sutbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N, Koseoglu BF. Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.034. PubMed 17466722 ↗
  • Stevens JA, Stoykov ME. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):1090-2. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00042-x. PubMed 12881842 ↗
  • Samuelkamaleshkumar S, Reethajanetsureka S, Pauljebaraj P, Benshamir B, Padankatti SM, David JA. Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov;95(11):2000-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jul 23. PubMed 25064777 ↗
  • Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):209-17. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324786. Epub 2008 Dec 12. PubMed 19074686 ↗
  • Cacchio A, De Blasis E, De Blasis V, Santilli V, Spacca G. Mirror therapy in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 of the upper limb in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Oct;23(8):792-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968309335977. Epub 2009 May 22. PubMed 19465507 ↗
  • Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32. Epub 2006 Nov 2. PubMed 17082465 ↗
  • Giraux P, Sirigu A. Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity. Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024. PubMed 14597303 ↗
  • Moseley LG, Gallace A, Spence C. Is mirror therapy all it is cracked up to be? Current evidence and future directions. Pain. 2008 Aug 15;138(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Jul 14. No abstract available. PubMed 18621484 ↗
  • Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230. PubMed 15217330 ↗
  • McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EF, Halligan PW, Wall PD, Blake DR. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Jan;42(1):97-101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg041. PubMed 12509620 ↗
  • Pervane Vural S, Nakipoglu Yuzer GF, Sezgin Ozcan D, Demir Ozbudak S, Ozgirgin N. Effects of Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1: A Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;97(4):575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 23. PubMed 26723854 ↗
  • Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2005 May;163(1):118-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9. Epub 2005 Mar 8. PubMed 15754176 ↗
  • Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sutbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Koseoglu F, Atay MB, Stam HJ. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162. PubMed 18295613 ↗
  • Wasner G, Schattschneider J, Binder A, Baron R. Complex regional pain syndrome--diagnostic, mechanisms, CNS involvement and therapy. Spinal Cord. 2003 Feb;41(2):61-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101404. PubMed 12595868 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 33 months.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's 33 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2017
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
Feb 25, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03377504
Lead sponsor
Ankara University
Responsible party
Ayşe A Küçükdeveci, MD (Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2019
Completion
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
Feb 25, 2020

Study contacts

Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci
principal investigator · Ankara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion