CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03375918CONSULT-BPUpdated Sep 19, 2025Results posted

COmmuNity-engaged SimULation Training for Blood Pressure Control

An interventional study of CONSULT-BP Educational Intervention in Hypertension, sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Massachusetts, Worcester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of CONSULT-BP is to train early-stage healthcare providers, including residents and nurse practitioner (NP) students, to mitigate providers' bias, improve communication skills, and enhance providers' ability to develop authentic and meaningful therapeutic alliances with patients. The study setting is an academic safety net hospital that serves a large non-White and poor population. The Investigators hypothesize that patients' outcomes (blood pressure levels) will be lower after the training intervention compared with before training (control) periods.

Read the detailed description

CONSULT-BP is an intervention to test a theory-based, 'awareness, exposure and skill-building' approach applied in the safety of a simulation-based learning center, to improve providers' interaction skills with minority and poor patients. The study included community-based participatory research input to develop and implement CONSULT-BP in an academic medical center with a large, safety-net health system which serves minority and poor population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • Healthcare disparities
  • Racial Bias
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

For Healthcare Trainees -

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Practice at a clinical site supported by an EMR to allow clinical data collection for outcome measurement
  2. 15-week clinical look-back period
  3. No prior completion of the CONSULT-BP intervention

Exclusion Criteria: 1. All 1st year trainees

For Patient Participants -

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. English-speaking
  2. Non-White racial/ethnic minority or Medicaid recipient (regardless of race/ethnicity)
  3. Hypertension identified in the EMR

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Enrolled in hospice.
  2. Pregnancy, dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar illness, or other serious medical co-morbidity that would interfere with hypertension self-control
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
118 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Healthcare Trainees

    Trainees were assigned to receive Other: CONSULT-BP Educational Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period.

    Other: CONSULT-BP Educational Intervention

Interventions

  • OtherCONSULT-BP Educational Intervention

    CONSULT-BP is a two sessions training provided to healthcare trainees over a 5-week period. The first session focused on (1) didactic overview of healthcare disparities, social drivers of health, implicit bias and systemic racism and (2) interactive discussions and patient storytelling videos to raise awareness of the bi-directional role of racial and ethnic identity among clinicians and patients. The second session focused on skill building and included (1) bias mitigation strategies based on the RELATE bias mitigation tool and (2) skill practice using 2 standardized patient simulated clinical encounters focusing on hypertension management challenges.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of patients treated by the participating clinician trainees as reported in the Electronic Medical Record.

    Time frame: Control period is 6 months before the intervention and intervention period is up to 6 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. RELATE Checklist, a Standardized Patient Rating Scale for Bias-Mitigating and Patient-Centered Communication

    The RELATE (Respect, Empathize, Listen, Ask, Talk, Engage) is a 19-item checklist completed by an informant group of "standardized" patients during a simulated standardized patient encounter to evaluate interaction with the participating clinicians. The RELATE checklist contains 4 factors: Respect (4 items), Empathetic Listening (5 items); Ask and Talk (Inquiry, 6 items), and Engagement in Partnership (4 items). The checklist scores are from 0 to 38, with higher scores reflecting better communication from the perspective of the "standardized" patient.

    Time frame: During CONSULT-BP session 2 clinician training intervention (simulated standardized patient encounter)

06

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2025

Participant flow

Within each academic year, we aimed to randomize training times to 1 of 5 start dates using a stepped wedge design. However, this design was not feasible beyond the first year of our study because of the COVID emergency.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneYear 1: Start Time 1Year 1: Start Time 2Year 1: Start Time 3Year 1: Start Time 4Year 1: Start Time 5Year 2: Cohort 1Year 3: Cohort 2Year 4: Cohort 3
Started600106527215264336256409
Control patients544020110412515080190
Intervention patients5346031498135159155196
Trainees12612134272123
Completed600106527215264336256409
Not completed00000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryBlood Pressure

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of patients treated by the participating clinician trainees as reported in the Electronic Medical Record.

Time frame:
Control period is 6 months before the intervention and intervention period is up to 6 months after the intervention
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Blood Pressure
mm HgPatients - Pre CONSULT-BP InterventionPatients - Post-Intervention
Systolic Blood Pressure137.6 ± 18.6136.4 ± 18.6
Diastolic BloodPressure82.1 ± 11.181.8 ± 10.8
SecondaryRELATE Checklist, a Standardized Patient Rating Scale for Bias-Mitigating and Patient-Centered Communication

The RELATE (Respect, Empathize, Listen, Ask, Talk, Engage) is a 19-item checklist completed by an informant group of "standardized" patients during a simulated standardized patient encounter to evaluate interaction with the participating clinicians. The RELATE checklist contains 4 factors: Respect (4 items), Empathetic Listening (5 items); Ask and Talk (Inquiry, 6 items), and Engagement in Partnership (4 items). The checklist scores are from 0 to 38, with higher scores reflecting better communication from the perspective of the "standardized" patient.

Time frame:
During CONSULT-BP session 2 clinician training intervention (simulated standardized patient encounter)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
RELATE Checklist, a Standardized Patient Rating Scale for Bias-Mitigating and Patient-Centered Communication
score on a scaleHealthcare Trainees
RELATE Checklist, a Standardized Patient Rating Scale for Bias-Mitigating and Patient-Centered Communication32.7 ± 5.0

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months after the intervention. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Healthcare Trainees0/118 (0%)0/118 (0%)0/118 (0%)
Patients - Control Arm0/944 (0%)0/944 (0%)0/944 (0%)
Patients - Intervention Arm0/1,651 (0%)0/1,651 (0%)0/1,651 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline information on Healthcare Trainees, Patients--Control Arm and Patients--Intervention Arm are aggregated from all cohorts within each population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Healthcare TraineesPatients - Control ArmPatients - Intervention ArmTotal
Mean30.7 ± 2.7554.8 ± 13.654.8 ± 13.254.8 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Healthcare TraineesPatients - Control ArmPatients - Intervention ArmTotal
Female584868941438
Male604587571275
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Healthcare TraineesPatients - Control ArmPatients - Intervention ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino9135217361
Not Hispanic or Latino5380014252278
Unknown or Not Reported569974
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Healthcare TraineesPatients - Control ArmPatients - Intervention ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian2281117220
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American4214364582
White39215383637
More than one race14257781204
Unknown or Not Reported529970
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Healthcare TraineesPatients - Control ArmPatients - Intervention ArmTotal
United States11894416512713
07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Barre Family Health Center
    Barre, Massachusetts 01005, United States
  • Tri River Family Health Center
    Uxbridge, Massachusetts 01569, United States
  • UMass Memorial Hahnemann Family Health Center
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States
  • UMass Memorial Medical Center -- Benedict Building
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tjia J, Pugnaire M, Calista J, Eisdorfer E, Hale J, Terrien J, Valdman O, Potts S, Garcia M, Yazdani M, Puerto G, Okero M, Duodu V, Sabin J. Using Simulation-Based Learning with Standardized Patients (SP) in an Implicit Bias Mitigation Clinician Training Program. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Jun 5;10:23821205231175033. doi: 10.1177/23821205231175033. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. PubMed 37324051 ↗
  • Tjia J, Pugnaire M, Calista J, Esparza N, Valdman O, Garcia M, Yazdani M, Hale J, Terrien J, Eisdorfer E, Zolezzi-Wyndham V, Chiriboga G, Rappaport L, Puerto G, Dykhouse E, Potts S, Sifuentes AF, Stanhope S, Allison J, Duodo V, Sabin J. COmmuNity-engaged SimULation Training for Blood Pressure Control (CONSULT-BP): A study protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 5;100(5):e23680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023680. PubMed 33592827 ↗
  • Calista J, Esparza N, Fernandez J, Beltran A, Bradshaw J, Casseres A, Duodu S, Duodu V, Fordjour C, Kuffour B, Mensah L, Negron-Cruz L, Pietri C, Pridgen C, Puerto G, Tessler LA, Tucci S, Wood K, Wright S, Zinkus P, Tjia J. Perspectives of Community Partners Involved in an Academic Training to Address Clinicians' Implicit Bias. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(2):347-351. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.a900215. PubMed 37462563 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 20, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual level participant data includes protected health information. There is no plan to share these data with other researchers.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03375918
Lead sponsor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Responsible party
Jennifer Tjia (Professor of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Worcester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2017
Start date
Aug 13, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Results posted
Sep 19, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer Tjia, MD, MSCE
principal investigator · UMass Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion