CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03369171MYOUpdated May 19, 2020

Wearable Biosensor to Track and Quantify Limb Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

An interventional study of Myo Armband (MYO,Thalamic Labs Inc, Kitchener, ON, Canada) in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-19.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of neurological injury in young adults. Capturing the extent of multiple domains of MS-related disability is critical for effective clinical care and the development of new paradigms for patient-focused therapeutic approaches. To date outcomes research in MS has centered on clinical exams, which may be insensitive over the short term (the 1-2 years of early stage clinical trials) and only capture a single snapshot of the patient's performance.

With the mass production of sensors in the gaming and computer control industry, there is an opportunity to transform the traditional neurological exam with biosensors already in use outside the realm of health applications. The investigators herein propose to use a commercialized wearable electroMYOgraphy sensor (MYO,Thalamic Labs Inc, Kitchener, ON, Canada) for detection of upper and lower limb dysfunction in MS patients. The investigators will determine if the device can differentiate the diseased states, refine signal processing algorithms to create reliable outcomes using this device in MS patients, and determine if these outcomes are strongly associated with patients and physicians reported ambulatory and dexterity metrics. The investigators hypothesize that this digital technology may be introduced in the standard neurological exam technique in a non-disruptive manner and more accurately and potentially remotely detect both physician-reported and patient-reported disability.

In the scope of this study, the investigators will also develop signal processing methodology to comprehensively track ambulation features.

Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of neurological injury in young adults. Capturing the extent of multiple domains of MS-related disability is critical for effective clinical care and the development of new paradigms for patient-focused therapeutic approaches. To date outcomes research in MS has centered on clinical exams, which may be insensitive over the short term (the 1-2 years of early stage clinical trials) and only capture a single snapshot of the patient's performance.

With the mass production of sensors in the gaming and computer control industry, there is an opportunity to transform the traditional neurological exam with biosensors already in use outside the realm of health applications. The investigators herein propose to use a commercialized wearable electroMYOgraphy sensor (MYO,Thalamic Labs Inc, Kitchener, ON, Canada) for detection of upper and lower limb dysfunction in MS patients. The investigators will determine if the device can differentiate the diseased states, refine signal processing algorithms to create reliable outcomes using this device in MS patients, and determine if these outcomes are strongly associated with patients and physicians reported ambulatory and dexterity metrics. The investigators hypothesize that this digital technology may be introduced in the standard neurological exam technique in a non-disruptive manner and more accurately and potentially remotely detect both physician-reported and patient-reported disability.

In the scope of this study, the investigators will also develop signal processing methodology to comprehensively track ambulation features.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 18 to 64 years inclusive (Patients over 64 years will not be enrolled to avoid possible effect of aging on the voluntary movement assessed);
  • Confirmed diagnosis of MS according to the revised McDonald criteria (including primary progressive, secondary progressive and relapsing-remitting MS) with brain lesions consistent with MS if data available;
  • No history of relapse in the previous 5 weeks.
  • Must be able or think they are able to attempt both finger and foot tapping tests, F2NT, 9HPT and be ambulatory with or without assistance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Minors
  • Adults under guardianship
  • Adults over 64 years
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    patients with MYO armband

    Device: Myo Armband (MYO,Thalamic Labs Inc, Kitchener, ON, Canada)

Interventions

  • DeviceMyo Armband (MYO,Thalamic Labs Inc, Kitchener, ON, Canada)

    MYO armband is a commercialized, gesture control device containing "Height Medical Grade Stainless Steel EMG sensors", and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) consisting of a three-axis gyroscope and a, three-axis accelerometer, three-axis magnetometer. MY0 motion data (EMG and IMU) will be recorded during standard motor/neurological evaluation. The clinical assessment will include standard motor neurological evaluation : EDSS and FS, walking status, foot tapping test, Heel-knee test, finger tapping test, Finger to nose test, Romberg test, timed 25 foot walk test, nine holes peg test. This clinical assessment will be done at the inclusion visit (V1) and at the follow-up visit at one year (V2).

    Also known as: MYO, Gesture control armband

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Discrimination of walking disorder status

    Normal or Abnormal walking status of MS patients will be determined at baseline based on clinical judgement and compared to EMG data from calf muscle of the more affected limb combined with Inertial Motion Unit (IMU).

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Foot tapping test

    \[Foot tapping test is used to assess rapid alternating movement of the lower extremity and coordination\]. Each lower extremity is assessed separately (by neurologist) while MYO is placed over calf muscle. Foot tapping test result based on clinical judgment is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: day 0

  2. Finger tapping test

    \[Finger tapping test is used to assess rapid alternating movement of the upper extremity and coordination\]. Each extremity is assessed separately (by neurologist) while MYO is placed over forearm muscle. Finger tapping test result based on clinical judgment is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: day 0

  3. Heel-knee test

    : \[Heel knee test is used to assess coordination of lower extremities and to detect cerebellum dysfunction\]. Each extremity is tested separately (by neurologist) while MYO is placed over calf muscle. Heel-knee test result based on clinical judgment is compared to MYO motion data

    Time frame: day 0

  4. Romberg test

    The Romberg test is used to assess balance. The test is performed while the patient is wearing MYO on the calf of the most affected leg

    Time frame: day 0

  5. Finger to nose test

    \[Finger to nose test is used to assess coordination of upper extremity movement\]. Each extremity is assessed separately (by neurologist) while MYO is placed over forearm muscle. Finger to nose test result based on clinical judgment is compared to MYO motion data

    Time frame: day 0

  6. Timed 25 foot walk test result

    Timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) is used to measure walking function based on time. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test. Patient is asked to walk 25 feet with MYO device placed over calf muscle of the most affected leg

    Time frame: day 0

  7. Nine holes peg test

    The nine holes peg test (9-HPT) is used to measure fine manual dexterity. 9-HPT measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Each side is tested separately with MYO placed over forearm muscle. Ability of MYO sensor to detect upper dysfunction is evaluated.

    Time frame: day 0

  8. Expanded disability status scores (EDSS)

    EDSS is a 20-step ordinal scale of disease severity ranging from to 10 in 0.5 increments (when reaching EDSS 1), with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on assessment by a neurologist of clinical deficit (rate from 0 to 5 or 6) in 8 functional systems (FS) combined with ambulation ability/mobility

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  9. Patient-reported disability using self-report questionnaire

    The questionnaire comprises 17 questions related to MS. To study the relationship between MYO motion data and patient-perceived disability

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  10. Twelve items Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale Assessment (MSWS-12) scale

    : MSWS-12 is a 12-item patient rate measure of the impact of MS on the individual's walking ability during the past 2 weeks. Each item is rate from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (extreme difficulty) then summed (ranging from 12 to 60, with higher score reflecting a greater impact of MS on walking). To study the relationship between MYO motion data and patient-perceived mobility.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  11. 12-item version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

    The short version of WHODAS 2.0 comprises 12 questions related to difficulties experienced in six domains (mobility, self-care, life activities, understanding and communicating interpersonal interactions, and participation in society) during the previous 30 days. Each item is rated from 1 (no problem) to 5(extreme). The scores from each item are summed to generate a total score ranging from 12 to 60, with higher score reflecting higher levels of disability. To study the relationship between MYO motion data and quality of life (related to disability)

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  12. Disability as measured with EDSS score

    To study the relationship between MYO motion data and physician-scored rated disability

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  13. Disability as measured with Functional systems score (FS)

    To study the relationship between MYO motion data and physician-scored rated disability

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  14. Dysfunction assessed by walking disorder status

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of walking disorder status is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  15. Dysfunction assessed by foot tapping test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of foot tapping test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  16. Dysfunction assessed by finger tapping test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of finger tapping test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  17. Dysfunction assessed by heel-knee test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of heel-knee test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  18. Dysfunction assessed by Romberg test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of Romberg test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  19. Dysfunction assessed by finger to nose test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of finger to nose test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  20. Dysfunction assessed by timed 25 foot walk test result

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of timed 25 foot walk test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

  21. Dysfunction assessed by nine holes peg test

    Dysfunction assessed by clinical exam of nine holes peg test is compared to MYO motion data.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at one year

06

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, 44093, France
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03369171
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
Start date
Jan 23, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2020
Completion
Feb 28, 2020
Last update
May 19, 2020

Study contacts

David Laplaud, PU-PH
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion