ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03368664LemKidsUpdated Aug 4, 2026Results posted

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Alemtuzumab in Pediatric Patients With RRMS With Disease Activity on Prior DMT

A Phase 3 interventional study of Alemtuzumab GZ402673 and Glatiramer acetate in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Genzyme, a Sanofi Company. Terminated at 13 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by Genzyme, a Sanofi Company (part of Sanofi) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Enrolment formally closed earlier than planned due to recruitment challenges.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of alemtuzumab intravenously (IV) in pediatric participants from 10 to less than (\<) 18 years of age with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who have disease activity on prior DMT.

Secondary Objective:

To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation, and potential effects of alemtuzumab on other multiple sclerosis (MS) disease characteristics such as cognition and quality of life (QoL).

Read the detailed description

The duration of study per participant was approximately 5 years and 5 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company is the lead sponsor of 308 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (76%) have results posted.

First submitted after Genzyme became part of Sanofi.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with RRMS aged from 10 years to \<18 years at study entry was eligible. Participants must meet the criteria of diagnosis of MS as defined by the International Pediatric MS Study Group (IPMSSG) criteria for pediatric MS and the criteria of MS based on 2010 McDonald criteria.
  • Signed written /assent obtained from participant and participant's legal representative (parent or guardian) according to local regulations.
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0.0 to 5.0 (inclusive) at screening.
  • At least 2 recorded MS attacks and at least 1 MS attack (relapse) in the last year during treatment with a beta interferon therapy (IFNB) or glatiramer acetate (GA) after being on that therapy for at least 6 months, and was currently still taking the same therapy.
  • At least 1 of the following:
  • >=1 new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesion or gadolinium enhancing lesion while on that same prior therapy (IFNB or GA), or
  • Two or more relapses in the prior year, or
  • Tried at least 2 MS DMTs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Any progressive or non-relapsing forms of MS.
  • Conditions/situations such as:
  • Impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements.
  • Current participation in another interventional clinical study. Participants who were treated with a comparator agent approved for screening inclusion (INF or GA) may be considered for this trial.
  • Participant was the Investigator or any Sub-Investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol.
  • Uncooperative participant or any condition that could make the participant potentially non-compliant to the study procedures in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Mental condition rendering the participant or parent/guardian unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
  • cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine, or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult or that would put the participant at risk by participating in the study in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • History of known (HIV) positivity.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding female participants or those who had planned to become pregnant during the study.
  • Unwilling to agree to use a highly effective method when receiving a course of alemtuzumab treatment and for 4 months following that course of treatment (fertile participants only).
  • Female participants who have commenced menstruating (i.e., are of ) and are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy.
  • Previous treatment with alemtuzumab.
  • Treatment with natalizumab, daclizumab, fingolimod, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil in the last 6 months prior to screening, or determined by the treating physician to had residual immune suppression from these or other MS treatments.
  • Treatment with teriflunomide in the last 12 months except if the participant underwent the recommended elimination procedure as per Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
  • Previous treatment with mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, cladribine, rituximab, ocrelizumab, leflunomide, or any cytotoxic therapy.
  • Previous treatment with any medication (drug that had not been approved at any dose or for any indication). Use of an investigational medication that is subsequently licensed and nonstandard use of a licensed medication (e.g., using a dose other than the dose that is stated in the licensed product labeling or using a licensed therapy for an alternative indication) was not exclusionary. Prior treatment with herbal medications or nutritional supplements was also permitted.
  • Intolerance of pulsed , especially a history of steroid psychosis.
  • History of .
  • Prior documented history of thrombocytopenia, or count at screening \< lower limits of normal (LLN).
  • Any disability acquired from trauma or another illness that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with evaluation of disability due to MS.
  • Participants with known Type 1 or anaphylactic reactions to the active substances or any of the , or intolerance of acyclovir or its therapeutic equivalent.
  • Major systemic disease or other illness that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromise participant safety or interfere with the interpretation of study results, e.g., current peptic ulcer disease, or other conditions that might predispose to hemorrhage, immune cytopenias, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, other connective tissue disorders, vasculitis, inflammatory bowel disease, severe psoriasis.
  • Medical, psychiatric, cognitive, or other conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, compromise the participant's ability to understand the participant information, to give , to comply with the trial protocol, or to complete the study.
  • Major psychiatric disorder that is not adequately controlled by treatment in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Epileptic seizures that are not adequately controlled by treatment.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related conditions: conditions that could interfere with MRI acquisition and/or interpretation of MRI results (eg, claustrophobia, orthopedic implants/treatments, orthodontic treatments etc).
  • Known bleeding disorder (e.g., dysfibrinogenemia, factor IX deficiency, hemophilia, Von Willebrand's disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation, fibrinogen deficiency, clotting factor deficiency).
  • Prior history of invasive fungal infections.
  • Active infection, eg, deep-tissue infection, that the Investigator considers sufficiently serious to preclude study participation.
  • In the Investigator's opinion, participant is at high risk for infection (e.g., indwelling catheter, dysphagia with aspiration, decubitus ulcer, history of prior aspiration pneumonia or recurrent urinary tract infection).

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Alemtuzumab

    \- alemtuzumab - Dose 1 (initial course) of alemtuzumab will be administered intravenously on 5 consecutive days, followed by Dose 2 (second course) on 3 consecutive days administered 12 months after initial course. Pre-medications (methylprednisolone, prednisolone, H1 antagonist \[antihistamine\], H2 antagonist, paracetamol, acyclovir) will be administered prior alemtuzumab administration. - Type: Experimental

    Drug: Alemtuzumab GZ402673 · Drug: Glatiramer acetate · Drug: Beta-Interferon · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Ranitidine · Drug: Ceterizine · Drug: Dexchlorpheniramine · Drug: Paracetamol · Drug: Acyclovir · Drug: Prednisolone · Drug: Diphenydramine · Drug: Other H1 antagonist

Interventions

  • Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: IV

    Also known as: Lemtrada

  • Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: subcutaneous (SC)

    Also known as: Copaxone

  • Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: SC / intramuscular (IM)

  • Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: IV

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: IV

  • DrugOther H1 antagonist

    Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: IV

  • DrugOther H1 antagonist

    Pharmaceutical form: tablet/pill, Route of administration: oral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Adjusted Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per Month

    Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per month was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during the study divided by the total number of follow-up months until the end of each period and was estimated based on negative binomial regression.

    Time frame: Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month up 4 to Month 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions

    Number of participants with at least one new or enlarged T2 lesions was reported in this outcome measure. Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during the study divided by the total number of follow-up months until the end of each period.

    Time frame: Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month 4 to Month 8

  2. Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Months 4 and 8

    EDSS was an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualified disability in participants with MS. It consisted of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (FS) (pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral, and other). Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. EDSS steps 1.0 to 4.5 referred to participants with MS who were fully ambulatory, while EDSS steps 5.0 to 9.5 were defined by the impairment to ambulation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain total EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments, where higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Baseline for EDSS was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first course of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Months 4 and 8

  3. Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Year 2

    Adjusted ARR was defined as the total number of relapses that occurred during the alemtuzumab treatment phase divided by the total number of follow-up years and was estimated based on negative binomial regression. Relapses were defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the neurologist and documented by the functional system scores.

    Time frame: At Year 2

  4. Change From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Total Score

    BVMT-R: tool to measure visuospatial learning and memory abilities across research and clinical settings. Visual display of 6 simple figures arranged in 2x3 matrix on separate pages was shown to participants for 3 consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants drew as many designs as accurately as they could in correct location. They were asked to reproduce designs in exact layout after 25-minute delay filled with other distractor tasks. Forced-choice recognition trial was administered immediately after delayed memory trial. Optional copy trial was included at end of test where participants were asked to copy figure display accurately. Scoring of immediate, delayed recall and copy trials were based on accuracy of drawings and location of figures. Score range 0 to 12 per trial; total score: 0 to 36 for all 3 trials. Higher scores: better visuospatial memory. Change from baseline in total score is presented. Baseline:Month -4 for Period 1;Month 4 for Period 2.

    Time frame: Period 1: Baseline (Month -4) and Month 0, Period 2: Baseline (Month 4) and Month 8

  5. Change From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT): Number of Completed Responses and Corrected Substitutions

    The SDMT was used to assess cognitive impairment and involved a simple substitution task that normal children and adults could easily perform. Using a reference key, the examinee/participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses were only in oral form for this study and administration time was just 5 minutes. The number of corrected substitutions and number of completed responses were recorded. The score for each was the number of correctly coded items ranging 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicated a better outcome. Change from baseline in number of completed responses and number of corrected substitutions by SDMT is presented. Baseline: Month -4 for Period 1; Month 4 for Period 2.

    Time frame: Period 1: Baseline (Month -4) and Month 0, Period 2: Baseline (Month 4) and Month 8

  6. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Questionnaire Score

    The PedsQL™ measurement model was a modular approach to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in healthy children and adolescents and those with acute and chronic health conditions. It included a child and teen self-report, and parents' report of children and teen. Each report consisted of 23 items and 4 scales (physical, emotional, social and school functioning). Each item used a 5-point rating scale (from 0='it is never a problem' to 4='it is almost always a problem'). Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0 (almost always) to 100 (never) scale. Total scores (0 to 100) for each report were mean of specific items where higher score indicated better HRQoL. Baseline: last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Child and teen report: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60; Parent report for children and teens: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 36

  7. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score

    Pediatric NeuroQoL was measurement system that evaluated and monitored physical, mental and social effects experienced by children living with neurological conditions. Physical effects (fatigue, pain) and mental effects (cognitive function, anxiety, depression) was assessed. Each domain had 8 to 10 items and participants indicated how often they experienced feelings and circumstances related to each domain on scale 1 to 5 (1='never' to 5='almost always'). This scale was reversed for cognitive function (1='very much' to 5='not at all'). Higher values: worse outcome for fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and better cognitive function. Raw scores were re-scaled to standardized scores with mean=50 and standard deviation=10. T-score range: 20 to 80. T-score \<30 indicated clinically significant impairment. Change from baseline in physical and mental effects scores by pediatric NeuroQoL is presented. Baseline: last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60

  8. Serum Concentrations of Alemtuzumab Over Time

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for measurement of serum concentrations of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  9. Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Alemtuzumab

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of Cmax of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  10. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Alemtuzumab

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of Tmax of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  11. Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Alemtuzumab

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of AUC of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  12. Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Alemtuzumab

    Blood samples for full PK analysis were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of AUC0-last of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  13. Terminal Half-Life (T1/2z) of Alemtuzumab

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of T1/2z of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14

  14. Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes: Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19), CD3, CD3-/16+56, CD4 and CD8

    Blood samples were collected for assessment of lymphocytes (CD19, CD3, CD3-/16+56, CD4 and CD8). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0); Months 1, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60

  15. Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes: CD4/CD8

    Blood samples were collected for assessment of lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab. Change from baseline in CD4/CD8 ratio is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0); Months 1, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60

  16. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. An AESI was an AE (serious or non-serious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required.

    Time frame: Prior DMT Phase: From signing of informed consent form (0-28 days before Month -4) to Month 0, approximately 5 months; Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase+Safety Monitoring Phase: From first alemtuzumab dose at Month 0 to end of study, approximately 60 months

  17. Number of Participants With Infusion-Associated Reactions (IARs) in the Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase

    An IAR was defined as any AE that occurred during alemtuzumab infusion or within the 24 hour post-infusion period. Number of participants with IARs in the alemtuzumab treatment phase is presented.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours post-infusion, at Months 0 and 12

  18. Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)

    Blood samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to alemtuzumab. Percentage of participants with positive ADA sample status are reported. Percentages are rounded off to tenth decimal place.

    Time frame: Months 1, 3, 12, 13, 15, 24, 36, 48 and 60

07

Results

Posted Jul 12, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated by the Sponsor due to low recruitment and an EMA Article-20 Pharmacovigilance review of Alemtuzumab in adult RRMS.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 9 sites in 6 countries. A total of 16 participants were screened and enrolled between 23-October-2017 and 07-September-2020. The study was terminated by the Sponsor due to low recruitment and an European Medicines Agency (EMA) Article-20 Pharmacovigilance review of Alemtuzumab in adult relapse remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Prior DMT Phase: Month -4 to Month 0
Participant flow — Prior DMT Phase: Month -4 to Month 0
MilestoneAlemtuzumab
Started16
Completed12
Not completed4
Withdrew: Physician decision1
Withdrew: Participant was withdrawn from study1
Withdrew: Principal investigator and parents decision1
Withdrew: Still on prior dmt phase or missing completion1
Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase:Month0 to 24
Participant flow — Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase:Month0 to 24
MilestoneAlemtuzumab
Started11
Treated11
Completed7
Not completed4
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Other3
Safety Monitoring Phase(Month 24 to 60)
Participant flow — Safety Monitoring Phase(Month 24 to 60)
MilestoneAlemtuzumab
Started7
Completed6
Not completed1
Withdrew: Poor compliance with protocol1

Outcome measures

PrimaryBrain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Adjusted Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per Month

Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per month was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during the study divided by the total number of follow-up months until the end of each period and was estimated based on negative binomial regression.

Time frame:
Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month up 4 to Month 8
Reported as:
Number · lesions per month
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Adjusted Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per Month
lesions per monthPeriod 1Period 2
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Adjusted Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per Month3.53 (1.78 to 7.03)0.13 (0.03 to 0.48)
SecondaryBrain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions

Number of participants with at least one new or enlarged T2 lesions was reported in this outcome measure. Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during the study divided by the total number of follow-up months until the end of each period.

Time frame:
Period 1: Month -4 up to Month 0, Period 2: Month 4 to Month 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions
ParticipantsPeriod 1Period 2
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of Participants With New or Enlarged T2 Lesions103
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Months 4 and 8

EDSS was an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualified disability in participants with MS. It consisted of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (FS) (pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral, and other). Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. EDSS steps 1.0 to 4.5 referred to participants with MS who were fully ambulatory, while EDSS steps 5.0 to 9.5 were defined by the impairment to ambulation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain total EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS) in half-point increments, where higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Baseline for EDSS was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first course of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Months 4 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Months 4 and 8
scores on scaleAlemtuzumab
Month 40.05 ± 0.52
Month 80.00 ± 0.55
SecondaryAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Year 2

Adjusted ARR was defined as the total number of relapses that occurred during the alemtuzumab treatment phase divided by the total number of follow-up years and was estimated based on negative binomial regression. Relapses were defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the neurologist and documented by the functional system scores.

Time frame:
At Year 2
Reported as:
Number · relapses per participant year
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Year 2
relapses per participant yearAlemtuzumab
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Year 20.53 (0.12 to 2.37)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Total Score

BVMT-R: tool to measure visuospatial learning and memory abilities across research and clinical settings. Visual display of 6 simple figures arranged in 2x3 matrix on separate pages was shown to participants for 3 consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants drew as many designs as accurately as they could in correct location. They were asked to reproduce designs in exact layout after 25-minute delay filled with other distractor tasks. Forced-choice recognition trial was administered immediately after delayed memory trial. Optional copy trial was included at end of test where participants were asked to copy figure display accurately. Scoring of immediate, delayed recall and copy trials were based on accuracy of drawings and location of figures. Score range 0 to 12 per trial; total score: 0 to 36 for all 3 trials. Higher scores: better visuospatial memory. Change from baseline in total score is presented. Baseline:Month -4 for Period 1;Month 4 for Period 2.

Time frame:
Period 1: Baseline (Month -4) and Month 0, Period 2: Baseline (Month 4) and Month 8
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Total Score
scores on scalePeriod 1Period 2
Change From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Total Score-2.0 ± 8.5-1.0 ± 4.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT): Number of Completed Responses and Corrected Substitutions

The SDMT was used to assess cognitive impairment and involved a simple substitution task that normal children and adults could easily perform. Using a reference key, the examinee/participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses were only in oral form for this study and administration time was just 5 minutes. The number of corrected substitutions and number of completed responses were recorded. The score for each was the number of correctly coded items ranging 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicated a better outcome. Change from baseline in number of completed responses and number of corrected substitutions by SDMT is presented. Baseline: Month -4 for Period 1; Month 4 for Period 2.

Time frame:
Period 1: Baseline (Month -4) and Month 0, Period 2: Baseline (Month 4) and Month 8
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Cognition Test Score of Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT): Number of Completed Responses and Corrected Substitutions
scores on scalePeriod 1Period 2
Corrected substitutions5.2 ± 7.92.8 ± 7.7
Completed responses5.0 ± 7.62.4 ± 8.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Questionnaire Score

The PedsQL™ measurement model was a modular approach to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in healthy children and adolescents and those with acute and chronic health conditions. It included a child and teen self-report, and parents' report of children and teen. Each report consisted of 23 items and 4 scales (physical, emotional, social and school functioning). Each item used a 5-point rating scale (from 0='it is never a problem' to 4='it is almost always a problem'). Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0 (almost always) to 100 (never) scale. Total scores (0 to 100) for each report were mean of specific items where higher score indicated better HRQoL. Baseline: last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Child and teen report: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60; Parent report for children and teens: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 36
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Questionnaire Score
scores on scaleAlemtuzumab
Child report: Month 4-5.0
Child report: Month 8-5.5 ± 12.0
Child report: Month 123.0
Child report: Month 18-4.0
Child report: Month 242.0
Child report: Month 360.0
Child report: Month 48-11.0
Child report: Month 60-25.0
Parent report for children: Month 41.0
Parent report for children: Month 8-4.5 ± 0.7
Parent report for children: Month 12-11.0
Parent report for children: Month 18-10.0
Parent report for children: Month 24-11.0
Parent report for children: Month 366.0
Teen report: Month 47.6 ± 15.8
Teen report: Month 81.7 ± 11.6
Teen report: Month 121.6 ± 7.9
Teen report: Month 186.3 ± 16.6
Teen report: Month 24-2.8 ± 5.2
Teen report: Month 36-8.8 ± 3.1
Teen report: Month 48-1.3 ± 9.3
Teen report: Month 6011.0 ± 4.2
Parent report for teens: Month 44.7 ± 17.2
Parent report for teens: Month 8-1.4 ± 8.0
Parent report for teens: Month 12-0.4 ± 6.3
Parent report for teens: Month 184.0 ± 18.6
Parent report for teens: Month 240.0 ± 0.0
Parent report for teens: Month 36-11.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score

Pediatric NeuroQoL was measurement system that evaluated and monitored physical, mental and social effects experienced by children living with neurological conditions. Physical effects (fatigue, pain) and mental effects (cognitive function, anxiety, depression) was assessed. Each domain had 8 to 10 items and participants indicated how often they experienced feelings and circumstances related to each domain on scale 1 to 5 (1='never' to 5='almost always'). This scale was reversed for cognitive function (1='very much' to 5='not at all'). Higher values: worse outcome for fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and better cognitive function. Raw scores were re-scaled to standardized scores with mean=50 and standard deviation=10. T-score range: 20 to 80. T-score \<30 indicated clinically significant impairment. Change from baseline in physical and mental effects scores by pediatric NeuroQoL is presented. Baseline: last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) and Months 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score
T-scoreAlemtuzumab
Physical effects score: Month 40.6 ± 7.3
Physical effects score: Month 81.2 ± 8.7
Physical effects score: Month 120.1 ± 7.8
Physical effects score: Month 180.0 ± 8.1
Physical effects score: Month 24-2.6 ± 7.9
Physical effects score: Month 36-6.1 ± 7.1
Physical effects score: Month 48-5.5 ± 9.9
Physical effects score: Month 60-11.7 ± 17.2
Mental effects score: Month 4-0.4 ± 7.4
Mental effects score: Month 8-0.1 ± 11.0
Mental effects score: Month 124.7 ± 8.3
Mental effects score: Month 182.9 ± 8.9
Mental effects score: Month 246.0 ± 5.6
Mental effects score: Month 361.7 ± 6.0
Mental effects score: Month 483.2 ± 11.3
Mental effects score: Month 605.5 ± 6.4
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Alemtuzumab Over Time

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for measurement of serum concentrations of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Mean · microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Serum Concentrations of Alemtuzumab Over Time
microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Alemtuzumab
Month 0 Day 1: Pre-dose0.00 ± 0.00
Month 0 Day 5: End of infusion9.15 ± 2.46
Month 0 Day 141.54 ± 1.30
Month 10.04 ± 0.08
Month 20.02 ± 0.07
Month 12 Day 1: Pre-dose0.00 ± 0.00
Month 12 Day 3: End of infusion5.04 ± 1.62
Month 12 Day 120.00 ± 0.00
Month 130.00 ± 0.00
Month 140.00 ± 0.00
SecondaryMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Alemtuzumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of Cmax of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/mL
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Alemtuzumab
mcg/mLAlemtuzumab
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Alemtuzumab8.729 ± 2.708
SecondaryTime to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Alemtuzumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of Tmax of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Median · hour
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Alemtuzumab
hourAlemtuzumab
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Alemtuzumab4.433 (3.75 to 6.08)
SecondaryArea Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Alemtuzumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of AUC of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Mean · mcg*hour/mL
Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Alemtuzumab
mcg*hour/mLAlemtuzumab
Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of AlemtuzumabNA ± NA
SecondaryArea Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Alemtuzumab

Blood samples for full PK analysis were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of AUC0-last of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Mean · mcg*hour/mL
Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Alemtuzumab
mcg*hour/mLAlemtuzumab
Area Under the Cumulative Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AlemtuzumabNA ± NA
SecondaryTerminal Half-Life (T1/2z) of Alemtuzumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints for determination of T1/2z of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 5, Day 14 of Month 0; Months 1 and 2; pre-dose on Day 1, end of infusion on Day 3, Day 12 of Month 12; Months 13 and 14
Reported as:
Median · hour
Terminal Half-Life (T1/2z) of Alemtuzumab
hourAlemtuzumab
Terminal Half-Life (T1/2z) of AlemtuzumabNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes: Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19), CD3, CD3-/16+56, CD4 and CD8

Blood samples were collected for assessment of lymphocytes (CD19, CD3, CD3-/16+56, CD4 and CD8). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0); Months 1, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes: Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19), CD3, CD3-/16+56, CD4 and CD8
10^9 cells per literAlemtuzumab
CD19: Month 1-0.40 ± 0.11
CD19: Month 4-0.13 ± 0.10
CD19: Month 80.01 ± 0.07
CD19: Month 120.09 ± 0.15
CD19: Month 13-0.25 ± 0.23
CD19: Month 15-0.15 ± 0.13
CD19: Month 18-0.14 ± 0.08
CD19: Month 21-0.06 ± 0.07
CD19: Month 24-0.08 ± 0.16
CD19: Month 36-0.05 ± 0.21
CD19: Month 48-0.06 ± 0.09
CD19: Month 60-0.08 ± 0.12
CD3: Month 1-1.43 ± 0.49
CD3: Month 4-1.36 ± 0.40
CD3: Month 8-0.85 ± 0.36
CD3: Month 12-0.78 ± 0.43
CD3: Month 13-1.25 ± 0.64
CD3: Month 15-1.19 ± 0.48
CD3: Month 18-1.15 ± 0.30
CD3: Month 21-0.95 ± 0.45
CD3: Month 24-0.97 ± 0.42
CD3: Month 36-0.79 ± 0.70
CD3: Month 48-0.61 ± 0.33
CD3: Month 60-0.59 ± 0.58
CD3-/16+56: Month 1-0.14 ± 0.19
CD3-/16+56: Month 4-0.04 ± 0.11
CD3-/16+56: Month 80.04 ± 0.09
CD3-/16+56: Month 12-0.10 ± 0.09
CD3-/16+56: Month 13-0.03 ± 0.13
CD3-/16+56: Month 15-0.10 ± 0.15
CD3-/16+56: Month 18-0.08 ± 0.20
CD3-/16+56: Month 21-0.03 ± 0.14
CD3-/16+56: Month 24-0.11 ± 0.15
CD3-/16+56: Month 36-0.15 ± 0.15
CD3-/16+56: Month 48-0.02 ± 0.09
CD3-/16+56: Month 60-0.01 ± 0.07
CD4: Month 1-0.89 ± 0.26
CD4: Month 4-0.83 ± 0.25
CD4: Month 8-0.55 ± 0.24
CD4: Month 12-0.49 ± 0.23
CD4: Month 13-0.75 ± 0.37
CD4: Month 15-0.71 ± 0.29
CD4: Month 18-0.69 ± 0.18
CD4: Month 21-0.59 ± 0.25
CD4: Month 24-0.59 ± 0.21
CD4: Month 36-0.50 ± 0.39
CD4: Month 48-0.34 ± 0.00
CD4: Month 60-0.35 ± 0.22
CD8: Month 1-0.45 ± 0.23
CD8: Month 4-0.45 ± 0.14
CD8: Month 8-0.27 ± 0.12
CD8: Month 12-0.26 ± 0.20
CD8: Month 13-0.43 ± 0.25
CD8: Month 15-0.41 ± 0.20
CD8: Month 18-0.38 ± 0.16
CD8: Month 21-0.30 ± 0.20
CD8: Month 24-0.31 ± 0.20
CD8: Month 36-0.24 ± 0.32
CD8: Month 48-0.23 ± 0.25
CD8: Month 60-0.21 ± 0.30
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes: CD4/CD8

Blood samples were collected for assessment of lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to first course of alemtuzumab. Change from baseline in CD4/CD8 ratio is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0); Months 1, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes: CD4/CD8
ratioAlemtuzumab
Month 1-0.80 ± 0.55
Month 4-0.56 ± 0.35
Month 8-0.24 ± 0.35
Month 12-0.14 ± 0.44
Month 13-0.23 ± 0.66
Month 15-0.44 ± 0.57
Month 18-0.50 ± 0.52
Month 21-0.34 ± 0.39
Month 24-0.24 ± 0.49
Month 36-0.24 ± 0.52
Month 480.03 ± 0.51
Month 60-0.13 ± 0.43
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. An AESI was an AE (serious or non-serious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required.

Time frame:
Prior DMT Phase: From signing of informed consent form (0-28 days before Month -4) to Month 0, approximately 5 months; Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase+Safety Monitoring Phase: From first alemtuzumab dose at Month 0 to end of study, approximately 60 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsPrior DMT PhaseAlemtuzumab Treatment Phase + Safety Monitoring Phase
Any AE1011
Any SAE33
Any AESI07
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infusion-Associated Reactions (IARs) in the Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase

An IAR was defined as any AE that occurred during alemtuzumab infusion or within the 24 hour post-infusion period. Number of participants with IARs in the alemtuzumab treatment phase is presented.

Time frame:
Up to 24 hours post-infusion, at Months 0 and 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Infusion-Associated Reactions (IARs) in the Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase
ParticipantsAlemtuzumab
Number of Participants With Infusion-Associated Reactions (IARs) in the Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase10
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)

Blood samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to alemtuzumab. Percentage of participants with positive ADA sample status are reported. Percentages are rounded off to tenth decimal place.

Time frame:
Months 1, 3, 12, 13, 15, 24, 36, 48 and 60
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
percentage of participantsAlemtuzumab
Month 1100
Month 390.0
Month 1260.0
Month 1371.4
Month 1587.5
Month 2466.7
Month 3662.5
Month 4880.0
Month 6083.3

Adverse events

Collected over Prior DMT Phase: From signing of the informed consent form (0 to 28 days before Month -4) up to Month 0, approximately 5 months; Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase + Safety Monitoring Phase: From the first alemtuzumab dose at Month 0 up to end of study, approximately 60 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prior DMT Phase0/16 (0%)3/16 (18.8%)10/16 (62.5%)
Alemtuzumab Treatment Phase + Safety Monitoring Phase0/11 (0%)3/11 (27.3%)11/11 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPrior DMT PhaseAlemtuzumab Treatment Phase + Safety Monitoring Phase
Multiple Sclerosis RelapseNervous system disorders3/161/11
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/162/11
Blood Creatine Phosphokinase IncreasedInvestigations0/161/11
Calculus UrinaryRenal and urinary disorders0/161/11
Multiple Sclerosis Pseudo RelapseNervous system disorders1/160/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 110
Most frequent other events
EventPrior DMT PhaseAlemtuzumab Treatment Phase + Safety Monitoring Phase
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/166/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/166/11
FatigueGeneral disorders1/165/11
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/164/11
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/164/11
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/164/11
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/164/11
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/164/11
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/163/11
Influenza Like IllnessGeneral disorders1/163/11

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on enrolled population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Alemtuzumab
Mean14.5 ± 2.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Alemtuzumab
Female4
Male12
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Alemtuzumab
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White12
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported4
08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500001
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500002
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800004
    Naples, Napoli 80131, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800005
    Cagliari, 09126, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160002
    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship 60-780, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160003
    Lodz, Lódzkie 93-338, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430001
    Moscow, 119602, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430004
    Moscow, 129110, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430005
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430002
    Saint Petersburg, 197110, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 7920001
    Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Investigational Site Number : 7920003
    Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Investigational Site Number : 8260002
    London, London, City of WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in May 2021, 42 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2022, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2017
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
StartActual
Oct 23, 2017
Primary completionActual
May 4, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 8, 2025
Results first posted
Jul 12, 2022
Last update
Aug 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03368664
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
Start date
Oct 23, 2017
Primary completion
May 4, 2021
Completion
Sep 8, 2025
Results posted
Jul 12, 2022
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Alemtuzumab · Glatiramer · Interferon beta · Methylprednisolone · Ranitidine · Cetirizine · Dexchlorpheniramine · Acetaminophen · Acyclovir · Prednisolone · Diphenhydramine

Start the discussion