ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03364127Updated May 30, 2025Results posted

Effect of Acupuncture on Patient Vulvodynia Outcomes

An interventional study of Active Acupuncture and Placebo Acupuncture in Vulvodynia, Vulvodynia, Generalized and Vulvar Vestibulitis, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 47 studies in Vulvodynia with a site in United States — 8 open to participants now, 9 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Vulvodynia · United States.

Enrollment
7th of 36
89 · median 45
Started
2018
with 6 others
No phase
18 of 47
1 open now
Registered
27th of 47
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 47
University of Illinois at Chicago

Among the 47 studies in Vulvodynia with a site in United States, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 36 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2018, is one of 18 with no phase, and was the 27th registered.

Vulvodynia

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Vulvodynia; 21 are open to participants now.

Browse Vulvodynia studies →

Open to participants now

8 of the 47 studies in Vulvodynia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

3 more — sign in →

All 8 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 13 Vulvodynia studies recruiting now, 8 (62%) set no upper age limit and 5 (38%) stop at 75 or younger; 0 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 45 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 47 studies in Vulvodynia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study evaluates acupuncture for the treatment of vulvodynia; specifically if it reduces vulvar pain and pain with intercourse. It also examines how long the effect of acupuncture lasts in women with vulvodynia. Half of the women will receive acupuncture and the other half will receive placebo acupuncture. Women who get a reduction in pain will monitor there pain once a week for up to 12 weeks to see how long the acupuncture effect lasts.

Read the detailed description

The investigators' goal is to demonstrate the effects of acupuncture for the treatment of vulvodynia. Up to 14 million American women have vulvodynia, a debilitating pain syndrome characterized by pain (burning, irritation, stinging or rawness) in the vulva and dyspareunia that renders sexual intercourse virtually impossible and leaves these women desperate for relief. Not only are women in pain, but they often lose their partners or have relationship difficulties due to their inability to have sexual intercourse. No therapies have been proven efficacious and rapid pain relief is unpredictable and rarely possible. After exhausting Western Medicine options, these women often turn to acupuncture. But in contrast to other pain conditions, there have been no acupuncture sham control studies of vulvodynia.

Only four studies, including one of the investigators', provide some evidence of the effect of acupuncture on vulvodynia. In three, single-group acupuncture studies, women had less pain, better quality of life, improved sexual health, and improved mental health. The investigators' randomized wait-list controlled pilot study of 36 women with vulvodynia showed great promise. The investigators found a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in vulvar pain and dyspareunia, and an increase in overall sexual function after a 5-week, 13-needle, 10 session acupuncture protocol. This newly developed, standardized acupuncture treatment protocol is the first breakthrough in the treatment of this puzzling disorder. It includes acupuncture points that relieve pain in the genitals. The results of the investigators' initial pilot study provided the first evidence from a two-group design that the acupuncture protocol could reduce pain intensity, pain during intercourse, and increase overall sexual function. These findings, however, warrant stronger evidence to support the inference that the effect is indeed due to the acupuncture since ours or no other study included a sham control or provided follow-up data beyond immediate posttest, which means that the duration of the acupuncture effect is unknown. The investigators' recent feasibility study paves the way to overcome this gap by use of double-blind acupuncture needles. Findings from these two studies support the investigators' proposal for the world's first double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acupuncture for vulvodynia while exploring its duration of effect.

The investigators propose a phase 2 double-blind, pretest/posttest RCT to compare effects of penetrating needles or the skin touch placebo needles on vulvar pain in our 13-needle, 10-session acupuncture treatment protocol. A sample of 130 women, with a diagnosis of vulvodynia, either generalized or provoked vestibulodynia, 18 to 45 years of age will be recruited from clinical and community settings and 80 subjects are expected to complete the study. Stratified by type of vulvodynia, participants will be randomized 1:1 either to the penetrating needle group or the skin touch placebo needle group. These double-blind needles will provide a strong sham procedure to mask both the acupuncturist and subject to the type of needle used for the 10-treatment protocol.

Specific aims are to:

Aim 1. Compare the penetrating needle group and the skin touch placebo needle group for effects on the: (a) primary outcome: vulvar pain (PAINReportIt® average pain intensity, 0-10), and (b) secondary outcomes: dyspareunia (FSFI dyspareunia) and sexual function (FSFI total). The investigators hypothesize that controlling for baseline values, at posttest there will be statistically significant less vulvar pain (primary) and dyspareunia and better sexual function in the penetrating needle group compared to the skin touch placebo group.

Aim 2. In participants with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain intensity (at least 1.5 points) at posttest compared to pretest, describe the duration of the acupuncture treatment and placebo effects weekly until pain returns to pretest or up to 12 weeks after posttest. The investigators will describe the variability over time in vulvar pain intensity (0-10) after a tampon insertion-removal stimulus and thereby explore the duration of the effect by intervention group, vulvodynia subgroups, and demographic subgroups (e.g., age, race, occupation). These findings will provide insights to guide future research on initial and maintenance acupuncture for vulvodynia.

03

Conditions studied

  • Vulvodynia
  • Vulvodynia, Generalized
  • Vulvar Vestibulitis

Keywords

  • Vulvar Pain, Dyspareunia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. a previous diagnosis of generalized vulvodynia or provoked vestibulodynia
  2. 18 to 45 years old
  3. a pain now score 4 or higher with tampon insertion and removal performed at the initial screening exam
  4. speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusionary Criteria:

  1. infectious conditions of the vulva/vagina
  2. inflammatory conditions of the vulva/vagina
  3. neoplastic disorders of the vulva/vagina
  4. neurologic disorders of the vulva/vagina
  5. trauma to the genitals
  6. iatrogenic conditions of the genitals
  7. hormonal deficiencies
  8. co-morbid pelvic pain conditions (to avoid confounding pain outcomes) such as pelvic inflammatory disease and documented history of endometriosis
  9. menopause

Patients may have a history of but not have active in the last 6 months migraine headaches, temporomandibular joint disease (TMJ), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, or fibromyalgia.

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Experimental: Active Acupuncture

    Active Acupuncture two times per week for 5 weeks

    Other: Active Acupuncture

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Acupuncture

    Placebo Acupuncture two times per week for 5 weeks

    Other: Placebo Acupuncture

Interventions

  • OtherActive Acupuncture

    Active Acupuncture two times per week for 5 weeks

    Also known as: Penetrating Acupuncture Needle

  • OtherPlacebo Acupuncture

    Placebo Acupuncture two times per week for 5 weeks

    Also known as: Skin-touch Placebo Needle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).

    The subject calls the pain intensity a number ranging between the minimum value, 0 and 10, the maximum value. Zero represents "no pain" and 10 represents"pain as bad as it could be". Higher scores mean more pain. The PINS will include three items (pain now, least and worst pain in the past 24 hours), which are used to calculate the average of pain intensity. The PINS with the three items and standardized instructions is part of PAINReportIt® which is an electronic version of the 1970 version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

    Time frame: baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dyspareunia Subscale of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    The Dyspareunia Subscale of the FSFI measures pain with sexual intercourse. The FSFI consists of three items scored using a scale ranging from zero to five. The scores of the three items are then summed and multiplied by a factor of 0.4, resulting in a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 6.0, with higher scores indicating less pain with sexual intercourse.

    Time frame: baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5

  2. Total Score of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    The FSFI is a 19-item, multi-dimensional, self-report measure that measures overall sexual function from six domains of sexual response: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia. The six subscale scores are measured on a scale of 0-5 for each item. Individual item responses from each of the 6 domains are added together to achieve a domain score and are each multipled by a factor (desire, 0.6; arousal, 0.3; lubrication, 0.3; orgasm, 0.4; satisfaction, 0.4; and dyspareunia, 0.4). These final domain scores are summed to obtain the Total Score of the FSFI, ranging from 2.0 to 36.0, with higher scores indicating better overall sexual function.

    Time frame: baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5

  3. Vulvar Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).

    The subject calls the pain intensity a number between 0, the minimum value and 10, the maximum value. Zero is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as it could be." Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The PINS will include one item (vulvar pain intensity). The PINS with vulvar pain intensity and standardized instructions is part of PAINReportIt® which is an electronic version of the 1970 version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

    Time frame: after the 10th acupuncture treatment weekly up to 12 weeks post last acupuncture treatment.

07

Results

Posted May 30, 2025
Limitations and caveats
No limitations or caveats.

Participant flow

Four-hundred and fifty women were assessed for eligibility of which 290 did not meet eligibility criteria and 71 declined to participate. Eighty-nine participants were enrolled between February 2018 and September 2022. Participants were recruited from community settings as well as from medical clinics throughout the Chicagoland area, from healthcare provider referrals, and from the National Vulvodynia Association website.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo Acupuncture
Started4544
Completed3942
Not completed62

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).

The subject calls the pain intensity a number ranging between the minimum value, 0 and 10, the maximum value. Zero represents "no pain" and 10 represents"pain as bad as it could be". Higher scores mean more pain. The PINS will include three items (pain now, least and worst pain in the past 24 hours), which are used to calculate the average of pain intensity. The PINS with the three items and standardized instructions is part of PAINReportIt® which is an electronic version of the 1970 version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Time frame:
baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).
score on a scaleExperimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo Acupuncture
Baseline3.90 ± 2.393.51 ± 2.31
After the 10th acupuncture treatment week 52.48 ± 2.112.22 ± 2.09
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Active Acupuncture vs Placebo Acupuncture · ANCOVA · p = 0.702 · Mean difference (net): -.12 · 95% CI -.76 to .51Full information maximum likelihood for missing data and to retain participants for intention to treat model. Adjusted for baseline value.
SecondaryDyspareunia Subscale of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

The Dyspareunia Subscale of the FSFI measures pain with sexual intercourse. The FSFI consists of three items scored using a scale ranging from zero to five. The scores of the three items are then summed and multiplied by a factor of 0.4, resulting in a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 6.0, with higher scores indicating less pain with sexual intercourse.

Time frame:
baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Dyspareunia Subscale of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
score on a scaleExperimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo Acupuncture
Baseline1.22 ± 0.891.38 ± 1.16
after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 51.61 ± 1.761.83 ± 1.82
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Active Acupuncture vs Placebo Acupuncture · ANCOVA · p = 0.77 · Mean difference (net): .10 · 95% CI -.58 to .79Full information maximum likelihood for missing data and to retain participants for intention to treat model. Adjusted for baseline value.
SecondaryTotal Score of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

The FSFI is a 19-item, multi-dimensional, self-report measure that measures overall sexual function from six domains of sexual response: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia. The six subscale scores are measured on a scale of 0-5 for each item. Individual item responses from each of the 6 domains are added together to achieve a domain score and are each multipled by a factor (desire, 0.6; arousal, 0.3; lubrication, 0.3; orgasm, 0.4; satisfaction, 0.4; and dyspareunia, 0.4). These final domain scores are summed to obtain the Total Score of the FSFI, ranging from 2.0 to 36.0, with higher scores indicating better overall sexual function.

Time frame:
baseline and after the 10th acupuncture treatment week 5
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Total Score of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
score on a scaleExperimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo Acupuncture
Baseline15.9 ± 7.0517.4 ± 5.92
After the 10th acupuncture treatment week 517.0 ± 8.2919.3 ± 7.71
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Active Acupuncture vs Placebo Acupuncture · ANCOVA · p = 0.436 · Mean difference (net): 1.16 · 95% CI -1.76 to 4.09Full information maximum likelihood for missing data and to retain participants for intention to treat model. Adjusted for baseline value.
SecondaryVulvar Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).

The subject calls the pain intensity a number between 0, the minimum value and 10, the maximum value. Zero is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as it could be." Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The PINS will include one item (vulvar pain intensity). The PINS with vulvar pain intensity and standardized instructions is part of PAINReportIt® which is an electronic version of the 1970 version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Time frame:
after the 10th acupuncture treatment weekly up to 12 weeks post last acupuncture treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Vulvar Pain Intensity Will be Measured With the Pain Intensity Numbers Scale (PINS).
score on a scaleExperimental: Active Acupuncture/Duration of EffectPlacebo Acupuncture/Duration of Effect
Week 14.19 ± 2.332.60 ± 2.09
Week 23.37 ± 2.503.68 ± 2.31
Week 33.79 ± 2.683.16 ± 1.98
Week 43.23 ± 2.093.23 ± 2.39
Week 54.55 ± 2.543.13 ± 1.63
Week 63.88 ± 2.683.33 ± 1.78
Week 73.22 ± 1.993.84 ± 2.48
Week 82.67 ± 1.802.79 ± 1.57
Week 94.00 ± 2.832.32 ± 0.99
Week 103.50 ± 1.782.77 ± 1.59
Week 112.89 ± 2.573.04 ± 1.39
Week 125.40 ± 2.192.64 ± 1.22
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Active Acupuncture/Duration of Effect vs Placebo Acupuncture/Duration of Effect · Log Rank · p = 0.017 (Kaplan-Meier curves by treatment arm were examined to determine the rates of return to baseline over the 12-week follow-up period .) · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.72 · 95% CI 1.13 to 6.54

Adverse events

Collected over The specific time period over which adverse event data were collected was 5 weeks, which started at the first acupuncture treatment and was completed after the 10th acupuncture treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental: Active Acupuncture0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)
Placebo Acupuncture0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The analysis population is the same as the population in Participant Flow.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Experimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo AcupunctureTotal
Mean29.0 ± 8.2531.4 ± 8.3530.2 ± 8.34
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Experimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo AcupunctureTotal
Female454489
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo AcupunctureTotal
Hispanic or Latino10818
Not Hispanic or Latino343569
Unknown or Not Reported112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo AcupunctureTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native112
Asian347
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American235
White313162
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported6410
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Experimental: Active AcupuncturePlacebo AcupunctureTotal
United States454489
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Schlaeger JM, Suarez ML, Glayzer JE, Kobak WH, Meinel M, Steffen AD, Burke LA, Pauls HA, Yao Y, Takayama M, Yajima H, Kaptchuk TJ, Takakura N, Foster D, Wilkie DJ. Protocol for double-blind RCT of acupuncture for vulvodynia. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Nov 2;30:101029. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101029. eCollection 2022 Dec. PubMed 36387991 ↗
  • Desloge AA, Patil CL, Glayzer JE, Suarez ML, Kobak WH, Meinel M, Steffen AD, Burke LA, Yao Y, Takayama M, Yajima H, Kaptchuk TJ, Takakura N, Foster DC, Wilkie DJ, Schlaeger JM. Women's Experience of Living with Vulvodynia Pain: Why They Participated in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupuncture. J Integr Complement Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0647. Epub 2022 Sep 21. PubMed 36130137 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data generated by our research are available from the PI, Judith M. Schlaeger, upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The data will be available immediately upon release of this ClinicalTrials.gov website for 5 years.

Access criteria: Please email the Principal Investigator: Judith Schlaeger, jschlaeg@uic.edu

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 56 months.

Results were first posted in May 2025, 2 years 7 months after primary completion.

Of 32 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Vulvodynia, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56. This study's 56 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 32 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 30, 2017
First posted
Dec 6, 2017
StartActual
Feb 23, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 26, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 7, 2022
Results first posted
May 30, 2025
Last update
May 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03364127
Responsible party
Judith Schlaeger (Associate Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2017
Start date
Feb 23, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2022
Completion
Nov 7, 2022
Results posted
May 30, 2025
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Judith M. Schlaeger, PhD
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion