ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07820176Updated Sep 15, 2026

CPP Among Somali Women in Norway: SCED

An interventional study of Multimodal physiotherapy in Chronic Pelvic Pain, sponsored by Kristiania University College. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Kristiania University College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is a condition associated with negative cognitive, behavioral, sexual and emotional consequences. Although multimodal physiotherapy is recommended for women with CPP, it is unclear whether evidence can be adopted to Somali women living in Norway.

This study aims to evaluate a culturally adapted multimodal physiotherapy intervention consisting of pain education, physical activity, pelvic floor muscle training, and self-management strategies among Somali women with CPP.

The study uses a single-case experimental design with a nonconcurrent randomized multiple baseline. The design allows each participant to serve as their own control while all participants receive the intervention. Repeated quantitative outcome measures will evaluate changes in pain-related outcomes, perceived change in condition, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy, and self-efficacy. Qualitative interviews will explore feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, and the participants' experiences of chronic pelvic pain, and understanding and management of their own health.

Read the detailed description

Single-case experimental design (SCED) with repeated measurements structured into a nonconcurrent randomized multiple baseline design is the method of this study.

The study is divided into pre-intervention, baseline (Phase A), the intervention period (Phase B), post-intervention and follow-up.

Pre-intervention is the time period before baseline (Phase A). During this timperiod the participants will fill out the first questionnaire package.

Phase A is the baseline phase before initiation of the intervention. During this phase, pain-related outcomes and overall health (EQ VAS) will be measured repeatedly. There are three possible baseline lengths (4, 5, or 6 weeks) and the participants will be randomized to one of the baseline lenghts.

Phase B is the multimodal physiotherapy intervention, which starts immediately after the baseline period (intervention starts in week 5, 6, or 7, depending on the baseline length) and lasts for six months (24 weeks). The intervention consists of two parts. During the first two months (Phase B1), participants receive weekly physiotherapy sessions that include pain education and general physical activity, consisting of exercises targeting strength, mobility, balance, and endurance. During the following four months (Phase B2), participants receive physiotherapy sessions every other week. They continue with pain education and general physical activity, while pelvic floor muscle training and education on pelvic anatomy are introduced during this phase. Participants receive a total of 16 physiotherapy sessions during Phase B.

Throughout the intervention period (Phase B), participants will be encouraged to perform home-based exercises weekly as part of a self-management approach, supported by training diaries and individualized follow-up from women's health physiotherapists.

Post-intervention is the time period six months after baseline (Phase A) and immediately after intervention (Phase B). During this timperiod the participants will fill out the second questionnaire package and participate in individual interviews. The physiotherapists delivering the intervention will also participate in individual interviews.

Follow-up assessments will be conducted 12 months after baseline (Phase A). At this timperiod the participants will fill out the last questionnaire package and a second optional individual interview.

Outcomes are measured repeatedly within the baseline and intervention phases, allowing each participant to serve as their own control and enabling evaluation of changes following intervention initiation.

Pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up questionnaire assessments will include outcomes related to health literacy, quality of life, function, self-efficacy, perceived change in condition, treatment satisfaction, and mental health symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pelvic Pain

Keywords

  • Single-Case Experimental Design
  • Physiotherapy
  • Women's Health Physiotherapy
  • Women's Health
  • Migration Health
  • Chronic pain
  • Pain
  • Health Literacy
  • Quality of life
  • Physical activity
  • Pain education
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Therapeutics
  • Rehabilitation
  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Vulvodynia
  • Visual analysis
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Kristiania University College is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Biological females, aged between 18 and 45 years
  • Chronic pelvic pain symptoms >3 months
  • Moderate to severe pain intensity (≥4/10)
  • Somali background and currently residing in Norway
  • Able to understand simple Norwegian
  • Able to perform physical activity of low to moderate intensity
  • Able to travel to physiotherapy appointments for participation
  • Able and willing to give to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery during the past 12 months and any medical conditions that would interfere with the ability to participate
  • Severe pathology ()
  • Pregnancy, as well as childbirth within the last 12 months and breastfeeding
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Exercising regularly including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) more than once per week.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Multimodal physiotherapy

    Participants will complete a randomized multiple baseline phase of 4, 5, or 6 weeks before receiving a multimodal physiotherapy intervention. The intervention includes pain education, general physical activity, and pelvic floor muscle training with guidance and individualized adaptations based on participant needs by a physiotherapist, including a home exercise program performed up to three times per week. The same core intervention components will be delivered to all participants.

    Behavioral: Multimodal physiotherapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralMultimodal physiotherapy

    The intervention consists of a multimodal physiotherapy program including physiotherapist-guided exercises, a home exercise program performed three times per week, and pain education. The intervention is based on a standardized protocol with individualized adaptations according to each participant's symptoms, functional level, and progression. All participants receive the same core intervention components.

    Also known as: Physiotherapy, Pain education, Rehabilitation, Exercise therapy, Pelvic floor muscle training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain severity in chronic pelvic pain

    Assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), we ask for severity of pain today. For each scale, 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain". Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. Measured up to three times per week during single-case experimental design phases: baseline (A) and intervention (B). It will also be measured once at different time points: pre-intervention, post-intervention and at follow-up. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the question.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention, repeatedly throughout the 4-6 week baseline (Phase A) and 6-month intervention (Phase B), immediately post-intervention, and at 12-month follow-up.

  2. Chronic pelvic pain-related distress

    Assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), we ask for distress of pain today. For each scale, 0 indicates "no distress" and 10 indicates "extreme pain-related distress". Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. Measured up to three times per week during single-case experimental design phases: baseline (A) and intervention (B). It will also be measured once at different time points: pre-intervention, post-intervention and at follow-up. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the question.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention, repeatedly throughout the 4-6 week baseline (Phase A) and 6-month intervention (Phase B), immediately post-intervention, and at 12-month follow-up.

  3. Chronic pelvic pain-related interference

    Assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), we ask for interference of pain today. For each scale, 0 indicates "no interference" and 10 indicates "inability to perform activities". Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. Measured up to three times per week during single-case experimental design phases: baseline (A) and intervention (B). It will also be measured once at different time points: pre-intervention, post-intervention and at follow-up. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the question.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention, repeatedly throughout the 4-6 week baseline (Phase A) and 6-month intervention (Phase B), immediately post-intervention, and at 12-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Literacy

    Assessed using domains 2 (Having sufficient information to manage my health), 3 (Actively managing my health), 4 (Social support for health), and 8 (Ability to find good health information) of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), comprising a total of 19 items. Domains 2, 3, and 4 are rated on a 4-point agreement scale, while domain 8 is rated on a 5-point difficulty scale. Each domain is scored and interpreted separately according to the HLQ scoring guidelines. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  2. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L descriptive system)

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system. The questionnaire measures five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels ranging from no problems to extreme problems/unable to perform the activity. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  3. Overall health (EQ VAS)

    Overall health will be assessed using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) of the EQ-5D-5L. Participants rate their overall health today on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (the worst health the participant can imagine) to 100 (the best health the participant can imagine). The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  4. Patient-specific functional ability

    Patient-specific functional ability will be assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Participants will identify three personally meaningful activities affected by chronic pelvic pain and rate their ability to perform each activity on an 11-point scale from 0 (unable to perform the activity) to 10 (able to perform the activity without difficulty). Higher scores indicate better functional ability. At the initial assessment, a brief interviewer-assisted process will be used to support participants in identifying relevant activities. Subsequent assessments will use the same individually selected activities. The participant can choose to answer in Norwegian or Somali.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  5. Self-efficacy for managing chronic pelvic pain

    Self-efficacy for managing chronic pelvic pain will be assessed using a study-specific single-item question. Participants will rate their confidence in their ability to manage their pelvic pain independently in daily life on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no confidence in my ability to manage my pelvic pain independently) to 10 (very high confidence in my ability to manage my pelvic pain independently). Higher scores indicate greater perceived self-efficacy. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the question.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  6. Perceived change in chronic pelvic pain

    Perceived change in chronic pelvic pain will be assessed using a study-specific single-item question based on the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale. Participants will rate how their pelvic pain has changed compared with the start of the study on an 11-point scale ranging from -5 (very much worse), 0 (no change), to +5 (completely pain-free). Higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the question.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  7. Treatment satisfaction

    Treatment satisfaction will be assessed using four study-specific single-item questions rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied). Participants will rate their satisfaction with pain education, general physical activity, pelvic floor muscle training, and overall satisfaction with the intervention. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the questions.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention)

  8. Psychological distress (anxiety and depression symptoms)

    Psychological distress will be assessed using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-5 (HSCL-5), a five-item self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression during the previous two weeks. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological distress. The participant can choose to use the Norwegian or the Somali version of the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (before Phase A), immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), and at 12-month follow-up

  9. Experiences of chronic pelvic pain and the multimodal physiotherapy intervention

    Individual semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants receiving the intervention. Interviews will use open-ended questions, and interviews will be conducted in their preferred language when needed. The interviews will explore experiences, perceptions, and acceptability of the intervention, including understanding and management of chronic pelvic pain, health literacy, and bodily and emotional experiences related to overall health and quality of life. The interview guide will be informed by relevant domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and inspired by questions from the Conversational Health Literacy Assessment Tool (CHAT).

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention), with an optional follow-up interview at 12-months follow-up

  10. Physiotherapists' experiences of delivering the multimodal physiotherapy intervention

    Individual semi-structured interviews will be conducted with physiotherapists delivering the intervention. Interviews will use open-ended questions and will explore the physiotherapists' experiences of delivering the intervention, including perceived feasibility, acceptability, and possibilities of implementation in clinical practice.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of Phase B (post-intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Berghmans B, Cottrell AM, Dütschler J, Flink I, Grzybowska IM, Parsons B, Petersen K, Pinto RA, Tidman V, Vyawahare B. EAU Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain. European Association of Urology; 2021. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/chronic-pelvic-pain/.
  • Manolov R, Moeyaert M, Fingerhut JE. A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs. Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Mar 25;45(1):153-186. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00282-2. eCollection 2022 Mar. PubMed 35342872 ↗
  • Gele AA, Pettersen KS, Torheim LE, Kumar B. Health literacy: the missing link in improving the health of Somali immigrant women in Oslo. BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):1134. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3790-6. PubMed 27809815 ↗
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163. PubMed 20046623 ↗
  • Wahl AK, Hermansen A, Osborne RH, Larsen MH. A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model. Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):471-478. doi: 10.1177/1403494820926428. Epub 2020 Jun 7. PubMed 32508258 ↗
  • Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Berghmans B, Cottrell AM, Dütschler J, Flink I, Grzybowska IM, Parsons B, Petersen K, Pinto RA, Tidman V, Vyawahare B. EAU Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain. European Association of Urology; 2021. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/chronic-pelvic-pain/
  • Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. PubMed 33239350 ↗
  • Starzec-Proserpio M, Frawley H, Bo K, Morin M. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological conservative therapies for chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;232(1):42-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 13. PubMed 39142363 ↗
  • Pathak A, Sharma S, Heinemann AW, Stratford PW, Ribeiro DC, Abbott JH. Development and assessment of a verbal response scale for the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in a low-literacy, non-western population. Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):613-628. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02640-0. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PubMed 32965632 ↗
  • Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15. PubMed 29253607 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and the risk of re-identification. The study includes a small and culturally specific sample of Somali women living in Norway and collects sensitive health-related information, including repeated self-reported outcome measures and qualitative interview data. The combination of demographic characteristics, health-related information, and detailed personal experiences described in interviews may increase the possibility of identifying individual participants even after removal of direct identifiers. Data will therefore only be accessible to the research team and managed according to approved ethical and data protection procedures.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07820176
Lead sponsor
Kristiania University College
Collaborators
Oslo Metropolitan University, Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Madeleine Lyngmo Johansen, PhD Student
Contact
madeleine.lyngmojohansen@kristiania.no
+47 47381177
Merete Kolberg Tennfjord, PhD
Contact
meretekolberg.tennfjord@kristiania.no
+47 98663431
Merete Kolberg Tennfjord, PhD
principal investigator · Kristiania University College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion