ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06840314VIBRENTUpdated May 21, 2025

VIBRating vs Traditional Therapy for Treatment of ENTry Dyspareunia

An interventional study of Pelvic floor therapy in Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder, Dyspareunia and Vaginismus, sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.

Sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the use of a novel vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic device ("Kiwi") improves sexual function in sexually active women aged 18 and older with genito-pelvic pain and penetration disorder (GPPPD) more effectively than traditional vaginal dilators.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the use of the Kiwi device lead to higher sexual function scores compared to traditional vaginal dilators
  2. Does the Kiwi device improve sexual distress, pain, and overall symptom severity more effectively than traditional vaginal dilators?

Researchers will compare the Kiwi vibrating device to traditional cylindrical vaginal dilators to assess whether the Kiwi device results in greater improvements in sexual function and symptom relief.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to use either the Kiwi device or traditional vaginal dilators.
  • Use the assigned device three times per week for 15 minutes per session over four weeks.
  • Complete surveys before and after the study, including assessments of sexual function, pain, and overall improvement.
Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic device (the "Kiwi") compared to traditional vaginal dilators in improving sexual function outcomes in sexually active women aged 18 and older with genito-pelvic pain and penetration disorder (GPPPD).

The primary objective is to determine whether the Kiwi device leads to higher Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores after four weeks of use compared to traditional dilators.

Secondary objectives include assessing improvements in:

  • Sexual distress (Female Sexual Distress Scale - Desire/Arousal/Orgasm, FSDS-DAO)
  • Pelvic pain (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire, VPAQ-screen subscale)
  • Overall symptom severity (Patient Global Impression of Severity, PGI-S)
  • Perceived improvement (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I)

Participants (n=60) will be randomized into two arms:

  1. Kiwi device group - a commercially available vibrating pelvic floor therapeutic product.
  2. Traditional dilator group - a standard graduated cylindrical vaginal dilator set.

Participants will use their assigned device three times per week for 15 minutes per session over a four-week period. Data will be collected at baseline and at the end of the study using validated questionnaires.

The study hypothesizes that participants using the Kiwi device will demonstrate greater improvements in FSFI scores compared to those using traditional vaginal dilators, reflecting enhanced sexual function and reduced symptom severity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder
  • Dyspareunia
  • Vaginismus
  • Pelvic Pain
  • Vestibulodynia
  • Vulvodynia (Chronic Vulvar Pain)

Keywords

  • genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder
  • dyspareunia
  • entry dyspareunia
  • vaginismus
  • pelvic pain
  • female sexual function
  • pain with sex
  • vulvodynia
  • vestibulodynia
03

In context

Dyspareunia

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspareunia; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 63 across 126 interventional studies indexed under Dyspareunia.

Browse Dyspareunia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medstar Health Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 161 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Assigned female at birth
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (per ICD-10 diagnosis codes: F52.5 Vaginismus not due to a substance or known physiological condition, F52.6 Dyspareunia not due to a substance or known physiological condition, N94.1 Dyspareunia, N94.2 Vaginismus, N94.81 Vulvodynia)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior use of a therapeutic vaginal device used to treat GPPPD
  • Unmanaged genitourinary syndrome of menopause
  • History of pelvic radiation
  • History of genital tract
  • History of female genital mutilation
  • History of prior surgery for prolapse or incontinence, including vaginal mesh or midurethral sling mesh
  • Silicone allergy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kiwi (Commercially available therapeutic vibrating pelvic floor product)

    Kiwi is a therapeutic vibrating pelvic floor product that includes an option for external massage and stimulation. The V- shaped massager, is designed to bridge anatomical variety and has three main massage ends. 1. The cylindrical end is comparable in application to traditional vaginal dilators. However, one significant difference is its tapered shape; this allows for continuous and gradual diameter increase, as opposed to discrete increments in the traditional dilator sets. The tapered end has an optional vibration mode with 4 different intensity settings. This cylindrical shape can also be used as a tool to apply external pressure point massage to the muscles of the urogenital triangle, such as the perineal muscle and the bulbospongiosus muscles. 2. A wider flat surface area has an additional motor to apply vibration to the glans clitoris. This end can also be used for massage. 3. The rounded bottom end of Kiwi can be used as a broad area massage tool.

    Device: Pelvic floor therapy

  • Active comparator
    Silicone Dilator Arm

    A commercially available set of graduated cylindrical vaginal dilators. The standard of care is a 6-piece, progressive-sizing, silicone dilator set. Dimensions of the silicone dilators are (WxH): (1) 0.7"x4.75", (2) 0.9"x5.25", (3) 1.0"x5.45", (4) 1.1"x5.85", (5) 1.3"x6.35", (6) 1.5"x6.85". These dilators are not battery powered, have no buttons, and no removable pieces.

Interventions

  • DevicePelvic floor therapy

    Once randomized to either the vibrating pelvic floor massage arm or the traditional vaginal dilator arm, they will receive instructions on frequency of device use and will use manufacturer's instructions for specifics of device use. We will not dictate more specific instructions on use, nor is this standard of care, as every patient is unique and will need to retain autonomy in terms of how quickly they progress in the use of the product. They will then complete a survey at 4 weeks which includes measures of sexual function and pelvic pain, as well of global impressions of improvement in their symptoms.

    Also known as: PFPT, Pelvic floor physical therapy, pelvic floor massage

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    FSFI is considered the gold standard for the measurement of sexual function in women. It's a 19-item questionnaire that uses a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater levels of sexual functioning on the respective item. To score the measure, the sum of each domain score is multipled by a domain factor ratio (0.6 for desire, 0.3 for arousal, 0.3 for lubrication, 0.4 for orgasm, 0.4 for satisfaction, and 0.4 for pain) in order to place all domain tools on a comparable scale. The subsequent scores are summed to derive a total FSFI score. The possible range of scores is 2-36. A score less than or equal to 26.55 reflects clinically relevant sexual dysfunction.

    Time frame: Four weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. FSDS-DAO (Female Sexual Distress Scale- Distress/Arousal/Orgasm) Questionnaire

    The Female Sexual Distress Scale - Distress/Arousal/Orgasm (FSDS-DAO) Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess sexually related distress in women, with a particular focus on distress associated with arousal and orgasmic difficulties. The FSDS-DAO consists of 15 items that assess three key domains: sexually related distress, arousal difficulties, and orgasmic dysfunction. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always), with higher total scores indicating greater distress and dysfunction.

    Time frame: Four weeks

  2. Primary Outcome Questionnaire (PEQ)

    This is a seven item questionnaire in which each question queries whether the subject has in the last four weeks attempted intercourse, insertion of one or two fingers (by self or by partner), insertion of other objects (by self or by partner). There are four responses to choose from for each question: not attempted, attempted but not successful, attempted and sometimes successful, attempted and always successful.

    Time frame: Four weeks

  3. PGI-S- Patient Global Impression of Severity

    Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a single item questionnaire to assess a person's impression of disease severity. For purposes of this trial, it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now" on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "normal" to (4) "severe". The PASS threshold PGI-S score is \< 3.

    Time frame: Four weeks

  4. Patient Global Impression Of Improvement (PGI-I)

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a single item questionnaire to assess an individual's impression of change in urinary symptoms. For purposes of this trial the PGI-S has been adapted by removing "taking medication" and it will ask participants to "Check the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now, compared with how it was before you began this study" on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) "very much better" to (7) "very much worse". The PASS threshold PGI-I score is \< 3.

    Time frame: Four weeks

  5. VPAQ-screen Subscale: Self Stimulation/Penetration Interference (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire- Screening Form)

    The Self Stimulation/Penetration Interference and Q7 (Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire- Screening Form) asks the subject "How often do the following situations/activities cause vulvar pain?" The following situations/activities are queried: using tampons, solitary masturbation, masturbation while partner is present, solitary self penetration with fingers, solitary self penetration with sex toy.

    Time frame: Four weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • MedStar Health
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kendra Green · Contactkendra.s.green@medstar.net · 202-997-4536
    • Helen Y Zhang, MD · Contacthelen.y.zhang@medstar.net
    • Helen Y Zhang, MD · Sub investigator
    • Eun Sook Choi, MD · Sub investigator
    • Lauren Cosgriff, MD · Sub investigator
    • Cheryl Iglesia, MD · Principal investigator
    • Ariana Davis, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data will be collected and analyzed as an aggregate for any results.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2025, 8 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyspareunia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 17, 2025
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
StartActual
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2025
CompletionEst.
Mar 2026
Last update
May 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06840314
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 21, 2025

Study contacts

Helen Y Zhang, MD
Contact
helen.y.zhang@medstar.net
202-877-6526
Eun Sook Choi, MD
Contact
eunsook.choi@medstar.net
202-877-6526
Cheryl Iglesia, MD
principal investigator · Medstar Washington Hospital Center National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion