ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03363412Updated Nov 27, 2020

Tips Underdilatation in Patients With Cirrhosis

An interventional study of PTFE-covered stent grafts in Cirrhosis, sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Status unknown at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-27.

Sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2010, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE). The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stentgrafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.

The Investigators hypothesized that under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.

Aim of this proof-of-concept exploratory study is to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure that reduces the incidence of PSE while maintaining clinical efficacy.

Read the detailed description

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. TIPS is no longer viewed solely as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results regarding survival, particularly when used to treat high-risk patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), reported in 30-70% and 23-55% of patients with cirrhosis within the first year, respectively. The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE, that has apparently decreased with a more careful selection of patients, remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.

Current guidelines for TIPS placement recommend that the post-TIPS porto-caval pressure gradient (PSPG) should be reduced to less than 12 mmHg, particularly in patients with variceal hemorrhage as an indication. However, there is not enough evidence to support the use of available 10 mm rather than 8 mm nominal diameter PTFE-SG aiming to achieve this hemodynamic goal and the best control of variceal rebleeding and/or ascites. A step-wise procedure based on the progressive dilation of 10 mm diameter PTFE-SG by using balloon catheters of increasing diameter (i.e., from 8 to 10 mm) at the time of TIPS positioning has been proposed. However, if a larger diameter, leads to a higher decrease in PSPG, the higher amount of portal blood diverted to the systemic circulation and the lower residual portal perfusion of the parenchyma markedly increase the probability of post-TIPS encephalopathy.

It is conceivable that balloon dilation of TIPS to diameters smaller than those currently indicated (to 7 mm or lower) would allow for a sufficient PCG decrease in patients without a high post-TIPS portal inflow (i.e., relatively small spleen, lack of extensive portal collateralization, relatively hypodynamic circulation). However, currently no tools allow a pre-procedural definition of the ideal stentgraft diameter in individual patients. Moreover, PTFE-SGs that are specifically designed for TIPS are presently available as 8 or 10 mm and are not considered permanently under sizeable/adjustable for their intrinsic tendency to expand to nominal diameter. On the other hand, dilating PTFE-SGs far below the recommended diameter may increase the risk of TIPS thrombosis, a complication that would require prompt re-intervention.

The Investigators hypothesized that, within the cirrhotic parenchyma, under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.

Aim Aim of this study is a) to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure and b) to verify if this strategy reduces the incidence of PSE and other complications while maintaining clinical efficacy.

Study design This study is an exploratory proof-of-concept study analyzing feasibility and clinical outcomes of under-dilated TIPS in unselected consecutive cirrhotic patients in whom TIPS is indicated clinically and who agree to participate in the study. Initially, our strategy will be to under-dilate TIPS to 7 mm in 15 patients and, if the procedure won't lead to shunt occlusion, the rest of the patients will receive a TIPS under-dilated to 6 mm or less.

The group with under-dilated TIPS to less than 7 mm will be compared to a historical control group composed of patients who had standard TIPS placed prior to initiation of the study.

TIPS placement and hemodynamic evaluation PTFE-SGs (Viatorr® and Viatorr CX®, W.L. Gore \& Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) will be placed as previously described. Semi-compliant balloon catheters will be used both to pre-dilate the intra-parenchymal tract and to dilate PTFE-SGs after deployment. The intra-parenchymal tract will be pre-dilated to 6 mm or less in all patients. After its deployment, the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 7 (first 15 subjects) or 6 mm (following group) in patients in whom both the procedure and the final TIPS shape will be straightforward. During dilation of the intra-parenchymal tract, balloon pressure will be maintained at the nominal value for no more than 15-30 seconds, even in the lack of a complete flattening of notches at the level of vascular walls. The intra-parenchymal tract and the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 8 mm in patients with a challenging procedure and/or in whom the final TIPS shape will be curved.

For all groups, immediately after TIPS placement, pressures in the portal vein, along the intra-parenchymal tract of TIPS, and in the inferior vena cava will be recorded until a stable tracing will be obtained in each position (45-60 seconds). Permanent tracings will be read with PowerLab computer software (ADInstruments, Inc.). Post-TIPS porto-systemic pressure gradient (PSPG) will calculated by subtracting the inferior vena cava pressure from the portal vein pressure. All procedures will be performed under monitored anesthesia care without intubation and using midazolam and fentanyl as sedative and analgesic, respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cirrhosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fibrosis

1,270 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibrosis; 276 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 148 is above the median of 63 across 840 interventional studies indexed under Fibrosis.

Browse Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of cirrhosis determined on the basis of clinical history, histological examination, morphological characteristics of the liver at ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;
  • TIPS placed to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding or to control ascites, according to current guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • placement of two or more coaxial stent grafts;
  • refusal to consent to have TIPS dilated to a small diameter and/or to attend follow-up visits;
  • TIPS placed in the setting of acute variceal hemorrhage either as "early" TIPS or as salvage TIPS for continued bleeding or early rebleeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
148 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Underdilated TIPS

    Patients will be treated with PTFE-covered stent grafts balloon-dilated to less than 8 mm.

    Device: PTFE-covered stent grafts

Interventions

  • DevicePTFE-covered stent grafts

    Creation of a small diameter intrahepatic shunt between portal and hepatic veins.

    Also known as: VIATORR, VIATORR CX

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The degree of stentgraft dilation

    Modification of pressure gradients inside the intraparenchimal tract of the TIPS and/or its diameter at CT scan

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. The incidence of at least one episode of PSE

    West Haven grade II PSE or higher as evaluated by two observers at follow-up

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of shunt dysfunction requiring TIPS revision

    Invasive TIPS revision will be performed in case of recurrent variceal hemorrhage, continued need for paracentesis and/or if Doppler ultrasonography shows changes in the direction of flow in intrahepatic portal branches. TIPS will be considered as dysfunctional if the porto-systemic pressure gradient will be above the value recorded after the shunt creation.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. The incidence of recurrent variceal bleeding and/or recurrent ascites

    Variceal bleeding defined following Baveno indications. Ascites defined as the need for at least one large-volume paracentesis by 4 weeks after TIPS placement)

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. The absolute reduction of porto-systemic pressure gradient attained after TIPS placement;

    Values of post-TIPS porto-systemic pressure gradient will be classified as below 12 and 10 mmHg.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University of Florence
    Florence, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Filippo Schepis
    Modena, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in the Management of Portal Hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):306. doi: 10.1002/hep.23383. No abstract available. PubMed 19902484 ↗
  • Bureau C, Garcia-Pagan JC, Otal P, Pomier-Layrargues G, Chabbert V, Cortez C, Perreault P, Peron JM, Abraldes JG, Bouchard L, Bilbao JI, Bosch J, Rousseau H, Vinel JP. Improved clinical outcome using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated stents for TIPS: results of a randomized study. Gastroenterology. 2004 Feb;126(2):469-75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.016. PubMed 14762784 ↗
  • Riggio O, Angeloni S, Salvatori FM, De Santis A, Cerini F, Farcomeni A, Attili AF, Merli M. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2738-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02102.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4. PubMed 18775022 ↗
  • Casado M, Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bru C, Banares R, Bandi JC, Escorsell A, Rodriguez-Laiz JM, Gilabert R, Feu F, Schorlemer C, Echenagusia A, Rodes J. Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings. Gastroenterology. 1998 Jun;114(6):1296-303. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70436-6. PubMed 9609767 ↗
  • Riggio O, Ridola L, Angeloni S, Cerini F, Pasquale C, Attili AF, Fanelli F, Merli M, Salvatori FM. Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 27. PubMed 20537753 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2010 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2021, 132 months after the start.

Of 186 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fibrosis, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 132 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 194 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2017
First posted
Dec 6, 2017
StartActual
Jun 1, 2010
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 27, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03363412
Lead sponsor
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Collaborators
University of Florence
Responsible party
Filippo Schepis (MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2017
Start date
Jun 1, 2010
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 27, 2020

Study contacts

Filippo Schepis, MD
Contact
fschepis@unimore.it
+39 059 422 ext. 5664
Filippo Schepis, MD
principal investigator · University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion