ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03358927Updated Apr 9, 2021

Immediate Fast-Track Versus Standard Care for Persons Living With HIV in Haiti

An interventional study of Immediate Fast-Track Care and Deferred Fast-Track Care in HIV/AIDS, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Haiti. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-09.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the proposed R34 grant, the investigators will develop and test a strategy of immediate fast-track care. The study population will include adult patients with early HIV infection. Participants will be randomized to immediate fast-track or standard (deferred fast-track) care. All participants will receive same-day HIV testing and ART initiation prior to study enrollment. The intervention group will receive immediate fast-track care, which is conditional upon timely visits, and after 24 weeks in care, an undetectable viral load (HIV-1 RNA \<200 copies/ml). The standard group will be eligible to start fast-track care at 24 weeks, if they are on time for that visit and have an undetectable viral load. Participants in either group who are >3 days late for any fast-track visit will lose fast-track care for that visit; those in either group with detectable viremia on their 24-week viral load test will be evaluated by a physician, with follow-up visits every 4 weeks until they have an undetectable viral load. Participants will be followed for 48 weeks. With the proposed pilot study, the investigators aim to conduct the formative work that is necessary to successfully implement a future clinical trial with the same primary outcome. The investigators hypothesize that immediate fast-track care will result in higher retention with viral suppression.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, open-label pilot study comparing immediate fast-track vs. standard care for patients with WHO Stage 1 or 2 disease at HIV diagnosis. Participants will be enrolled on the day of HIV diagnosis, and will be followed for 48 weeks. The total sample size will be 254 participants; of these, 56 will be patients or providers enrolled in one-time focus groups, 20 will be enrolled for testing the manuals and study procedures, and 178 will be enrolled in the pilot RCT.

The study site is GHESKIO (Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections) in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. The study population includes men and women who are at least 18 years of age who are ART-naïve, and who present with WHO Stage 1 or 2 diseases at HIV diagnosis.

Participants in both groups will initiate ART on the day of HIV testing, prior to enrollment and randomization. They will then be randomized to immediate versus standard (deferred fast-track) care. Those in the immediate group will start fast-track care on the day of HIV testing. Those in the standard group will start fast-track care if they are on time for their 24-week visit, with HIV-1 RNA \<200 copies/ml. Participants in both groups will receive identical care from weeks 24 to 48.

Once a patient qualifies for fast-track care, it is provided in the same manner for both groups.

  • Reminder phone call and point-of-service dispensing of ART: The CHW calls patient one day in advance, to ensure they can attend visit. If patient responds in the affirmative, then their ART and prophylactic medications are packaged in advance.
  • Minimal waiting time to see clinician, with short, focused visits: Total visit time is about 30 minutes.
  • Less frequent clinic visits: Other than the first 3 months for the immediate group, fast-track care includes quarterly nurse visits, with CHW phone calls during months when no clinic visit is scheduled;
  • Nurse-led care: Fast-track visits are all staffed by nurses, except in the case that a patient has a new symptom; in that case, the patient receives a fast-track physician evaluation, with appropriate fast-track follow-up care. For example, in the rare case that a patient develops active TB, they will receive fast-track care with physician and nurse visits as appropriate.
02

Conditions studied

  • HIV/AIDS

Keywords

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Fast-track care
  • Behavioral economics
  • Differentiated care
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 306 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 149 is above the median of 96 across 2,251 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,267 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 65 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women of ≥18 years of age
  • Ability and willingness to give written
  • Documentation of positive status (test conducted at GHESKIO), and initiation of same-day ART prior to enrollment
  • Physician-confirmed WHO Stage 1 or 2 disease
  • Acceptance of HIV diagnosis, defined as affirmative responses to two questions: "I believe that HIV and AIDS exist" and "I believe that the results of my HIV test show that I am infected".
  • Access to a phone, or able to provide a contact person with a phone (this does not require disclosure of HIV status to the contact person)
  • Agreement to provide a contact phone number and address, and to accept home visits from a CHW.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any use of ART in the past
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding at the screening visit
  • WHO Stage 3 or 4 disease
  • Active drug, alcohol use, or mental condition that would interfere with the ability to adhere to study requirements, in the opinion of the study physician
  • Score of \<3 for any of the 7 questions on the ART readiness survey
  • Planning to transfer care to another clinic during the study period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
149 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Group

    Deferred fast-track care

    Behavioral: Deferred Fast-Track Care

  • Experimental
    Immediate Fast-Track Group

    Immediate fast-track care

    Behavioral: Immediate Fast-Track Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralImmediate Fast-Track Care

    Eligible for fast-track care at enrollment

  • BehavioralDeferred Fast-Track Care

    Eligible for fast-track care after 6 months on ART

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Viral Suppression; cut-off <200 copies/ml

    HIV-1 RNA \<200 copies/ml

    Time frame: 48 weeks after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Viral Suppression; cut-off <50 copies/ml

    HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/ml

    Time frame: 48 weeks after enrollment

  2. Viral Suppression; cut-off <1000 copies/ml

    HIV-1 RNA \<1000 copies/ml

    Time frame: 48 weeks after enrollment

  3. Adherence by pharmacy refill records

    ART dispensed by the pharmacy for at least 90% of the days in the study period (302 days of ART dispensed during the 336-day study period)

    Time frame: 48 weeks after enrollment

  4. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost per patients with undetectable viral load

    Time frame: 48 weeks after enrollment

  5. Connectedness to Treatment Setting Scale

    Mean score; range 10-60; a higher score indicates greater connection to treatment setting

    Time frame: Day of enrollment, and 24 weeks and 48 weeks after enrollment

  6. State Hope Scale

    Mean score; range 6 to 30; a higher score indicates greater hopefulness

    Time frame: Day of enrollment, and 24 weeks and 48 weeks after enrollment

  7. Patient Satisfaction Survey

    Mean score; range 5 to 25; a higher score indicates greater satisfaction

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 24, and 48 after enrollment

  8. Social Provisions Scale

    Mean score; range 24 to 96; a higher score indicates greater degree of perceived support

    Time frame: Day of enrollment, and 24 and 48 weeks after enrollment

  9. Coping Survey

    Mean score; range 38 to 152; a higher score indicates a greater sense of being able to cope with a situation

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 24, and 48 after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GHESKIO
    Port-au-Prince, Haiti
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will post an anonymized dataset after the study is complete.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be available at the time of publication of the primary study results.

Access criteria: Information will be posted online.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03358927
Collaborators
Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Duke University, Florida International University, Analysis Group, Inc.
Responsible party
Serena Patricia Koenig (Associate Physician, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2017
Start date
Nov 27, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2021
Completion
Apr 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 9, 2021

Study contacts

Serena Koenig, MD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital/GHESKIO
Jean Pape, MD
study director · GHESKIO; Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion