ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03354442Updated Jul 18, 2019

Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance

An interventional study of Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance in Malocclusion, Angle Class III, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-18.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2017, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This experimental study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion.

The study sample will consist of 44 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. The sample will be allocated randomly into two groups: experimental group and untreated control group.

The soft and hard tissue changes will be assessed using lateral cephalometric radiographs before the treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet.

Read the detailed description

This research aimes to evaluate the effects of a Class III functional appliance [the modified fixed mandibular retractor (MFMR)] in the early treatment of skeletal Class III deformities.

It was not ethical to expose all candidate children to radiographic examination. Therefore, the assessment of skeletal Class III malocclusion was based on clinical judgment. Each patient was examined, while his/her mandible was kept at its retruded contact position to evaluate both jaws in space. Those who met the inclusion criteria were then sent to the radiographic department.

The radiographic lateral cephalograms were obtained in the patients' habitual occlusion.

All patients in the treatment group were treated by one specialist orthodontist 'AA' using the MFMR. The appliance consisted of the following elements: (1) Two acrylic upper posterior bite planes which cover the deciduous and permanent molars ( 2) Two transpalatal arch (0.8-mm TMA) with opposite U loop, the anterior one is near the first deciduous molars while the posterior one is near the first permanent molars (3) upper reversed labial bow (0.9-mm stainless steel) extending to the cervical edges of the mandibular anterior teeth from the labial surface of the lower primary canine on one side to the other labial surface of the contralateral tooth. This bow will be activated to hold the mandible in its maximum posterior physiologic position; and (4) the anterior spring (0.8-mm TMA) which starts from the acrylic bite plane in both sides, makes loop, then bends to touch the cingulum of upper incisors to procline the upper permanent incisors when diagnosed as retroclined.

The untreated group will receive no orthodontic treatment during the observation period. According to the Dental School Local Research Ethics Committee's guidelines, all children in the untreated group will receive orthodontic treatment after the end of the observational period of the study at no cost.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III

Keywords

  • Class III treatment
  • Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
  • RCT
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class III

57 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class III; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is above the median of 32 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class III.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class III studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in early mixed dentation (7-9 years old).
  • Skeletal class III caused by mandibular prognathism with or without maxillary deficiency judged clinically and confirmed radiographically (ANB≤1).
  • Anterior crossbite on two teeth or more.
  • Normal inclination of the lower incisors with the mandibular plane.
  • Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities.
  • Severe skeletal class III resulting primarily from mandibular prognathism (ANB less than - 4 with no functional shift on closure)
  • Patients with facial asymmetry.
  • Patients with vertical growth pattern.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor

    All patients in this group will be treated using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance. This appliance will be used full-time.

    Device: Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance

  • No intervention
    Untreated control group

    All patients in this group will be observed during the period of treating the patients in the other group to assess the growth changes.

Interventions

  • DeviceModified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance

    All patients with Class III malocclusion will be treated using the Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ANB angle changes

    ANB angle changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. SNA angle changes

    SNA angle changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

  2. SNB angle changes

    SNB angle changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

  3. Profile changes

    Profile changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

  4. Upper incisor angle changes

    Upper incisor angle changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

  5. Lower incisor angle changes

    Lower incisor angle changes before and after treatment will be assessed and compared with those of the control group using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

    Time frame: Changes will be evaluated before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet, which will take approximately 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Damascus University
    Damascus, 00963, Syrian Arab Republic
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alhaija ES. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006 Winter;31(2):149-52. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.31.2.u286433up81kt472. PubMed 17315814 ↗
  • Akin M, Ucar FI, Chousein C, Sari Z. Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects. J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Nov;76(6):520-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0315-3. PubMed 26446505 ↗
  • Majanni AM, Hajeer MY. The Removable Mandibular Retractor vs the Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction in the Correction of skeletal class III Malocclusion in children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):361-71. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1856. PubMed 27443361 ↗
  • Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, Dibiase AT. A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):96-101. doi: 10.2319/032011-197.1. Epub 2011 Aug 1. PubMed 21806467 ↗
  • Atalay Z, Tortop T. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Dec;32(6):655-61. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp153. Epub 2010 Mar 26. PubMed 20348164 ↗
  • Kapur A, Chawla HS, Utreja A, Goyal A. Early class III occlusal tendency in children and its selective management. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Sep;26(3):107-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.43191. PubMed 18923222 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The Individual participant data will be only available for the researchers in the department of Orthodontics, Damascus University

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03354442
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2017
Start date
May 15, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2017
Completion
Jan 10, 2019
Last update
Jul 18, 2019

Study contacts

Ahmad S Burhan, PhD.
study chair · Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion