ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03345511Updated Apr 30, 2018

Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block for Benign Anal Surgery

An interventional study of Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Anal Fissure, Anal Fistula and Hemorrhoids, sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-30.

Sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2015, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Interventional study that evaluate analgesia and side effects of Ultrasound guided Caudal block preoperatively in benign canal anal surgery

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain is an important symptom in patients after benign anal canal surgery. Caudal block has been described to decrease postoperative pain in this type of surgery. Ultrasound is a tool that facilitates its performance and increases the rate of a successful block.

Objective:

To determine the usefulness of ultrasound guided caudal block in anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients scheduled for benign anal surgery. Methods : Interventional study in adult patients that received ultrasound caudal anesthetic block before benign anal surgery. The investigators evaluated analgesic efficacy of this intervention by mean of numeric rating scale ( NRS) for pain after 6, 12 and 24 hours of surgery, rescue analgesia, motor block, urinary retention, surgical conditions and patient satisfaction in postoperative period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anal Fissure
  • Anal Fistula
  • Hemorrhoids
  • Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

  • ultrasound guided caudal block
  • anal surgery
03

In context

Fissure in Ano

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Fissure in Ano; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 99 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Fissure in Ano.

Browse Fissure in Ano studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Antioquia is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age from 18 to 70 year old patient
  • schedule for benign anal surgery ( hemorrhoids, anal fistula, fissure or abcess )
  • Caudal analgesic injection before surgery
  • Use of ultrasound to guide needle insertion into caudal space

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment
  • verbal communication impairment
  • infection in skin at injection site
  • coagulopathy
  • technique refusal
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block

    30 minutes before benign canal anal surgery, a 18 G tuohy needle guided with an ultrasound probe to visualize the caudal space, a solution of bupivacaine 0.25%, Lidocaine 1% and dexamethasone 8mg was injected and needle removed.

    Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound Guided Caudal Block

    Using an external ultrasound probe, the investigators guided a 18 gauge epidural needle into the caudal space and injected a local anesthetic solution consisting in bupivacaine 0.25%, lidocaine 1% and dexamethasone 8mg in the caudal space.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain intensity (P3). Self reported pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery.

    The pain numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a single 11-point numeric scale in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain , with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rescue Analgesia (R3) need of opioid medication for rescue severe postoperative pain at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery.

    Doses of intravenous tramadol for rescue in severe postoperative pain

    Time frame: 1 day

Other outcomes

  1. motor block

    presence or absence of motor block in lower extremity after caudal block

    Time frame: 2 hours post surgical

07

Study locations

1 site
  • hospital universitario San Vicente Fundacion
    Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shin S, Kim JY, Kim WO, Kim SH, Kil HK. Ultrasound visibility of spinal structures and local anesthetic spread in children undergoing caudal block. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Nov;40(11):2630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Sep 12. PubMed 25220270 ↗
  • Ibacache ME, Munoz HR, Fuentes R, Cortinez LI. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination and caudal block for superficial lower abdominal and genital surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 May;25(5):499-505. doi: 10.1111/pan.12642. Epub 2015 Mar 4. PubMed 25736098 ↗
  • Doo AR, Kim JW, Lee JH, Han YJ, Son JS. A Comparison of Two Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Caudal Injection: The Influence of the Depth of the Inserted Needle on Caudal Block. Korean J Pain. 2015 Apr;28(2):122-8. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.122. Epub 2015 Apr 1. PubMed 25852834 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — only final results of research

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2015 to primary completion in May 2016, 6 months.

Of 25 interventional studies with no phase under Fissure in Ano, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30. This study's 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2016
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2016
Last update
Apr 30, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03345511
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Antioquia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completion
May 30, 2016
Completion
Jun 30, 2016
Last update
Apr 30, 2018

Study contacts

Adriana M Cadavid, MD
principal investigator · Anesthesiology Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion