ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03345004Updated Jan 9, 2023Results posted

Diamyd Administered Into Lymph Nodes in Combination With Vitamin D in Type 1 Diabetes

A Phase 2 interventional study of Diamyd and Vitamin D in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus and Autoimmune Diseases, sponsored by Diamyd Medical AB. Completed at 18 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-09.

Sponsored by Diamyd Medical AB · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
109
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 13 studies testing retogatein in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 — none open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. retogatein · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Enrollment
5th of 13
109 · median 50
Started
2017
the only one that year
Phase 2
9 of 13
none open now
Registered
11th of 13
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 13
Diamyd Medical AB

Among the 13 studies testing retogatein in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, this one is the 5th largest by enrollment, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 9 in phase 2, and was the 11th registered.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 13 studies testing retogatein in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 is open now. The open studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, anywhere →

About retogatein

No approval found in the FDA or EMA files read. How studies give it is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 411 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies recruiting now, 128 (31%) set no upper age limit and 257 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 184 take children under 18; 64 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 12 Years to 24 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 13 studies testing retogatein in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective of DIAGNODE-2 is to evaluate the efficacy of Diamyd compared to Placebo, upon administration directly into a lymph node in combination with an oral vitamin D/Placebo regimen, in terms of preserving endogenous insulin secretion as measured by C-peptide.

Read the detailed description

The study is a 2-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial. Eligible patients will receive injections of Diamyd/placebo into an inguinal lymph gland at three occasions, with one month intervals in combination with an oral vitamin D/placebo regimen (starting 1 month ahead of injections) during 4 months. All patients will continue to receive intensive insulin treatment from their personal physicians during the whole study period. The patients will be followed in a blinded manner for a total of 15 months. All patients that have not performed the 15 months visit when the updated protocol is implemented, will be asked to participate in the Extension Study Period which includes an additional visit at month 24.

03

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Metabolic Disease
  • Glucose Metabolism Disorders
  • Immune System Diseases
  • Endocrine System Diseases
  • Juvenile Diabetes
  • Insulin Dependent Diabetes
  • Autoimmune Diabetes
  • Vitamin D
  • Physiological Effects of Drugs

Keywords

  • Diamyd
  • Diabetes
  • Juvenile Diabetes
  • Diabetes Type 1
  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Autoimmune Diabetes
  • Insulin Dependent Diabetes
  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • rhGAD65
  • GAD65
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 1
  • Glucose Metabolism Disorders
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • Vitamin D
  • Vitamins
  • Micronutrients
  • Cholecalciferol
  • Ergocalciferols
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. given by patients and/or patient's parent(s) or legal acceptable representative(s) (guardian(s)) according to national regulations
  2. Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) according to the Amercian Diabetes Association (ADA) classification diagnosed ≤6 months at the time of screening
  3. Age: ≥12 and \<25 years old
  4. Fasting C-peptide ≥0.12 nmol/L (0.36 ng/ml) on at least one occasion (maximum 2 tests on different days within a period of 2 weeks)
  5. Positive for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase isoform 65 (GAD65A) but \< 50 000 IU/ml
  6. Females must agree to avoid pregnancy and have a negative urine pregnancy test. Patients of must agree to use adequate , until one (1) year after the last administration of Diamyd. Adequate contraception is as follows:

For females of childbearing potential:

  1. oral (except low-dose gestagen (lynestrenol and norestisteron)), injectable, or implanted hormonal contraceptives
  2. combined (estrogen and progestogen containing)
  3. oral, intravaginal or transdermal progesterone hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation
  4. intrauterine device
  5. intrauterine hormone-releasing system (for example, progestin-releasing coil)
  6. bilateral tubal occlusion
  7. vasectomized male (with appropriate post vasectomy documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate)
  8. male partner using condom
  9. abstinence from heterosexual intercourse

For males of childbearing potential:

  1. condom (male)
  2. abstinence from heterosexual intercourse

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous or current treatment with therapy (although topical or inhaled are accepted)
  2. Continuous treatment with anti-inflammatory drug (sporadic treatment e.g. because of headache or in connection with fever a few days will be accepted)
  3. Treatment with any oral or injected anti-diabetic medications other than insulin
  4. A history of anemia or significantly abnormal hematology results at screening
  5. A history of epilepsy, head trauma or cerebrovascular accident, or clinical features of continuous motor unit activity in proximal muscles
  6. history of acute reaction to vaccines or other drugs in the past
  7. Treatment with any vaccine, including influenza vaccine, within 4 months prior to planned first study drug dose or planned treatment with any vaccine up to 4 months after the last injection with study drug.
  8. Participation in other clinical trials with a new chemical entity within the previous 3 months
  9. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the provisions of this protocol
  10. A history of alcohol or drug abuse
  11. A significant illness other than diabetes within 2 weeks prior to first dosing
  12. Known or hepatitis
  13. Females who are lactating or pregnant (the possibility of pregnancy must be excluded by urine βHCG on-site within 24 hours prior to the Diamyd/placebo treatment)
  14. Presence of associated serious disease or condition, including active skin infections that preclude intralymphatic injection, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient non-eligible for the study
  15. Deemed by the investigator not being able to follow instructions and/or follow the study protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
109 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active arm

    Patients will be assigned to receive i) three (3) intralymphatic injections with Recombinant human Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase adsorbed to Alhydrogel (Diamyd) on Days 30, 60, and 90 and; ii) oral vitamin D 2000 IU/daily for 4 months (from Day 1 through Day 120)

    Biological: Diamyd · Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo arm

    Patients will be assigned to receive i) three (3) intralymphatic injections of Placebo for Diamyd on Days 30, 60, and 90 and; ii) oral Placebo for vitamin D once a day for 4 months (from Day 1 through Day 120)

    Biological: Placebo for Diamyd · Dietary Supplement: Placebo for Vitamin D

Interventions

  • BiologicalDiamyd

    Alhydrogel®-formulated recombinant human glutamic acid decarboxylase (rhGAD65)

    Also known as: GAD-alum

  • Dietary supplementVitamin D

    Oil suspension of Vitamin D

  • BiologicalPlacebo for Diamyd

    Alhydrogel® only

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo for Vitamin D

    Placebo oil suspension for Vitamin D

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Stimulated C-peptide During a MMTT

    Change in C-peptide between Baseline and 15 Months. C-peptide was measured by Area Under the Curve \[AUC\] at 0-120 min during a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) and divided by 120 min. The results are given as the ratio (back-transformed from log-scale) between 15 Months and Baseline as predicted by the MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measures) model.

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in IDAA1c

    Change in insulin-dose-adjusted HbA1c (IDAA1c)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  2. Change in HbA1c

    Change in HbA1c (mmol/mol)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  3. Change in Insulin Consumption

    Change in daily exogenous insulin consumption (IU)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  4. Change in Glycemic Variability/Fluctuations

    Change in glycemic variability/fluctuations (evaluated from data from continuous glucose monitoring FreeStyle LibrePro, FGM) over 14 day period.

    Time frame: Screening and 15 months

  5. Percentage of Patients With IDAA1c ≤ 9

    Percentage of patients with IDAA1c ≤ 9

    Time frame: 15 months

  6. Stimulated Maximum C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L

    Percentage of patients with a stimulated maximum C-peptide level above 0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/ml)

    Time frame: 15 months

  7. Stimulated C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L at 90 Min

    Percentage of patients with a stimulated 90min C-peptide level above 0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/ml)

    Time frame: 15 months

  8. Number of Hypoglycemias

    Number of self-reported episodes of severe hypoglycemia (Severe hypoglycemia defined as needing help from others and/or seizures and/or unconscious) (counts)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  9. Number of Patients Having at Least 1 Severe Hypoglycemic Event

    Number of patients having at least 1 severe hypoglycemic event (counts)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  10. Change in Maximum C-peptide

    Change in maximum C-peptide during MMTT (nmol/L)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  11. Change in Fasting C-peptide

    Change in Fasting C-peptide (nmol/L)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  12. C-peptide Levels During a MMTT

    C-peptide measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes during MMTT (nmol/L) at 15 months

    Time frame: 15 months

  13. Change in Body Weight

    Change in body weight (kg)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  14. Injection Site Reactions

    Injection site reactions

    Time frame: 15 months

  15. Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Laboratory Measurements (Haematology and Clinical Chemistry) and Urinalysis.

    Number of clinically significant abnormal results from laboratory measurements (haematology and clinical chemistry) and urinalysis. (counts)

    Time frame: 15 months

  16. Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Physical and Neurological Examinations

    Physical examination (general appearance including skin, mouth, throat, cardiovascular, abdomen, lymphatic glands, and neurological/musculoskeletal \[including reflexes\]). Standardised clinical neurological examination including extremity reflexes, Romberg, Walk on a line, 2 meters, Standing on 1 leg, left and right, 15 seconds per leg, Finger-nose, Mimic, Babinski reflex. The outcome of the assessments was recored as "normal" or "abnormal"

    Time frame: 15 months

  17. GAD65A Titer

    GAD65A titer (IU/ml)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  18. Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results in Vital Signs

    Vital signs (blood pressure) (mmHg)

    Time frame: 15 months

  19. Change in Quality of Life (QoL)

    Change in QoL as measured by the standardised measure of health questionnaire EQ-5D-5L between baseline and Month 15. The EQ-5D-5L is based on 5 questions rated at 5 levels indicating from no problem (level 1) to extreme problems (level 5) regarding current state of mobility, self-care, activity, pain and anxiety. The outcome is presented as a weighted index value, where 1 is the best possible health and 0 represents being dead.

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

  20. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Change in BMI (kg/m2)

    Time frame: Baseline and 15 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 9, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Started5752
Haplotype dr3-dq2 population month 152919
Completed5651
Not completed11
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Stimulated C-peptide During a MMTT

Change in C-peptide between Baseline and 15 Months. C-peptide was measured by Area Under the Curve \[AUC\] at 0-120 min during a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) and divided by 120 min. The results are given as the ratio (back-transformed from log-scale) between 15 Months and Baseline as predicted by the MMRM (Mixed Model Repeated Measures) model.

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · Unitless back-transformed from log-scale
Change in Stimulated C-peptide During a MMTT
Unitless back-transformed from log-scaleActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in Stimulated C-peptide During a MMTT0.551 ± 1.7150.506 ± 2.1630.663 ± 1.5110.425 ± 2.436
Statistical analysis
  • Active Arm vs Placebo Arm · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.5009 · Estimated ratio: 1.091 · 95% CI 0.845 to 1.408
  • Active (HLA DR3-DQ2) vs Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0078 · Estimated ratio: 1.557 · 95% CI 1.126 to 2.153
SecondaryChange in IDAA1c

Change in insulin-dose-adjusted HbA1c (IDAA1c)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percent of glycated hemoglobin
Change in IDAA1c
Percent of glycated hemoglobinActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in IDAA1c0.757 ± 1.8510.377 ± 2.1830.663 ± 1.6270.667 ± 2.788
SecondaryChange in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c (mmol/mol)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/mol
Change in HbA1c
mmol/molActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in HbA1c0.53 ± 14.571.04 ± 15.870.87 ± 14.34-0.98 ± 18.75
SecondaryChange in Insulin Consumption

Change in daily exogenous insulin consumption (IU)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg/24h
Change in Insulin Consumption
IU/kg/24hActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in Insulin Consumption0.183 ± 0.2850.094 ± 0.3420.143 ± 0.1960.153 ± 0.399
SecondaryChange in Glycemic Variability/Fluctuations

Change in glycemic variability/fluctuations (evaluated from data from continuous glucose monitoring FreeStyle LibrePro, FGM) over 14 day period.

Time frame:
Screening and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · glycemic variability/fluctuation per day
Change in Glycemic Variability/Fluctuations
glycemic variability/fluctuation per dayActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
70-180 mg/dL (hours)-2.479 ± 4.638-2.451 ± 4.012-1.724 ± 3.346-3.920 ± 4.090
50-70 mg/dL (hours)-0.035 ± 2.4160.197 ± 1.9610.034 ± 2.9920.581 ± 1.057
<50 mg/dL (minutes)15.7 ± 46.79.0 ± 88.416.7 ± 59.348.1 ± 107.0
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With IDAA1c ≤ 9

Percentage of patients with IDAA1c ≤ 9

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · Percent of patients
Percentage of Patients With IDAA1c ≤ 9
Percent of patientsActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Percentage of Patients With IDAA1c ≤ 962.7 (48.1 to 75.9)61.4 (45.5 to 75.6)78.6 (59.0 to 91.7)40.0 (16.3 to 67.7)
SecondaryStimulated Maximum C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L

Percentage of patients with a stimulated maximum C-peptide level above 0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/ml)

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · Percent of patients
Stimulated Maximum C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L
Percent of patientsActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Stimulated Maximum C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L92.7 (82.4 to 98.0)75.7 (61.1 to 86.7)96.6 (82.2 to 99.9)70.6 (44.0 to 89.7)
SecondaryStimulated C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L at 90 Min

Percentage of patients with a stimulated 90min C-peptide level above 0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/ml)

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · Percent of patients
Stimulated C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L at 90 Min
Percent of patientsActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Stimulated C-peptide Above 0.2 Nmol/L at 90 Min87.3 (75.5 to 94.7)71.4 (56.7 to 83.4)96.6 (82.2 to 99.9)64.7 (38.3 to 85.8)
SecondaryNumber of Hypoglycemias

Number of self-reported episodes of severe hypoglycemia (Severe hypoglycemia defined as needing help from others and/or seizures and/or unconscious) (counts)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Hypoglycemias
EpisodesActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Number of Hypoglycemias0600
SecondaryNumber of Patients Having at Least 1 Severe Hypoglycemic Event

Number of patients having at least 1 severe hypoglycemic event (counts)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Having at Least 1 Severe Hypoglycemic Event
ParticipantsActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Number of Patients Having at Least 1 Severe Hypoglycemic Event0100
SecondaryChange in Maximum C-peptide

Change in maximum C-peptide during MMTT (nmol/L)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · nmol/L
Change in Maximum C-peptide
nmol/LActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in Maximum C-peptide-0.350 ± 0.463-0.300 ± 0.350-0.257 ± 0.400-0.277 ± 0.349
SecondaryChange in Fasting C-peptide

Change in Fasting C-peptide (nmol/L)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · nmol/L
Change in Fasting C-peptide
nmol/LActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
Change in Fasting C-peptide-0.115 ± 0.148-0.106 ± 0.169-0.081 ± 0.100-0.095 ± 0.190
SecondaryC-peptide Levels During a MMTT

C-peptide measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes during MMTT (nmol/L) at 15 months

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Mean · nmol/L
C-peptide Levels During a MMTT
nmol/LActive ArmPlacebo ArmActive (HLA DR3-DQ2)Placebo (HLA DR3-DQ2)
30 min0.376 ± 0.2950.374 ± 0.3300.659 ± 0.3520.580 ± 0.282
60 min0.536 ± 0.3830.495 ± 0.4110.911 ± 0.3930.715 ± 0.308
90 min0.645 ± 0.4950.562 ± 0.4381.016 ± 0.4150.717 ± 0.318
120 min0.691 ± 0.5420.590 ± 0.4441.065 ± 0.4300.728 ± 0.317
SecondaryChange in Body Weight

Change in body weight (kg)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · Kg
Change in Body Weight
KgActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Change in Body Weight4.3 ± 5.05.6 ± 5.4
SecondaryInjection Site Reactions

Injection site reactions

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · number of episodes
Injection Site Reactions
number of episodesActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Injection Site Reactions103
SecondaryNumber of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Laboratory Measurements (Haematology and Clinical Chemistry) and Urinalysis.

Number of clinically significant abnormal results from laboratory measurements (haematology and clinical chemistry) and urinalysis. (counts)

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · number of significant abnormal results
Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Laboratory Measurements (Haematology and Clinical Chemistry) and Urinalysis.
number of significant abnormal resultsActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Laboratory Measurements (Haematology and Clinical Chemistry) and Urinalysis.113
SecondaryNumber of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Physical and Neurological Examinations

Physical examination (general appearance including skin, mouth, throat, cardiovascular, abdomen, lymphatic glands, and neurological/musculoskeletal \[including reflexes\]). Standardised clinical neurological examination including extremity reflexes, Romberg, Walk on a line, 2 meters, Standing on 1 leg, left and right, 15 seconds per leg, Finger-nose, Mimic, Babinski reflex. The outcome of the assessments was recored as "normal" or "abnormal"

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · Clinically significant abnormal results
Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results From Physical and Neurological Examinations
Clinically significant abnormal resultsActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Physical examination159
Neurological examination40
SecondaryGAD65A Titer

GAD65A titer (IU/ml)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · IU/mL
GAD65A Titer
IU/mLActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Baseline731.3 ± 2302.9627.3 ± 1829.9
Month 1519941.2 ± 23083.6476.7 ± 1527.7
SecondaryNumber of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results in Vital Signs

Vital signs (blood pressure) (mmHg)

Time frame:
15 months
Reported as:
Number · Clinically significant abnormal results
Number of Clinically Significant Abnormal Results in Vital Signs
Clinically significant abnormal resultsActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Systolic blood pressure00
Diastolic blood pressure00
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life (QoL)

Change in QoL as measured by the standardised measure of health questionnaire EQ-5D-5L between baseline and Month 15. The EQ-5D-5L is based on 5 questions rated at 5 levels indicating from no problem (level 1) to extreme problems (level 5) regarding current state of mobility, self-care, activity, pain and anxiety. The outcome is presented as a weighted index value, where 1 is the best possible health and 0 represents being dead.

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Median · Index value
Change in Quality of Life (QoL)
Index valueActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Baseline1.000 (0.922 to 1.000)1.000 (0.919 to 1.000)
Month 151.000 (0.919 to 1.000)1.000 (1.000 to 1.000)
SecondaryChange in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI (kg/m2)

Time frame:
Baseline and 15 months
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m2
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m2Active ArmPlacebo Arm
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.8 ± 1.41.3 ± 1.6

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events, from start of Diamyd/Placebo treatment until Month 24.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Arm0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)18/57 (31.6%)
Placebo Arm0/52 (0%)3/52 (5.8%)12/52 (23.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive ArmPlacebo Arm
Jaw fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/571/52
Diabetes Mellitus inadequate controlMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/571/52
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/571/52
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActive ArmPlacebo Arm
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations10/5710/52
Viral infectionInfections and infestations4/570/52
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/573/52
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/572/52

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Mean16.2 ± 3.816.6 ± 4.316.4 ± 4.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Female212647
Male362662
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Active ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • Diabetes Centre, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
    Praha, 14021, Czechia
  • Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Motol
    Praha, 15006, Czechia
  • Diabeter Rotterdam
    Rotterdam, 3011 TA, Netherlands
  • Adult and Pediatrics Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Universitario Cruces
    Barakaldo, 48903, Spain
  • Adult Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital vall D' Hebrón
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Pediatrics Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Vall D'Hebrón
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Adult Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal
    Madrid, 28033, Spain
  • Adult Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Carlos Haya
    Málaga, 29009, Spain
  • Pediatrics Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Materno-Ifantil
    Málaga, 29011, Spain
  • Adult Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Macarena
    Sevilla, 41009, Spain
  • Pediatrics Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Virgen del Rocío
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Adult and Pediatrics Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hospital Miguel Servet
    Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
  • Barn- och Ungdomskliniken, Universitetssjukhuset
    Linköping, 58185, Sweden
  • Endokrinmedicinska kliniken. Universitetssjukhuset
    Linköping, 58185, Sweden
  • Barn-och Ungdomsmedicinmottagningen and Endokrinmottagningen, Skånes Universitetssjukhus
    Malmö, 20502, Sweden
  • Barn- och ungdomskliniken, Uddevalla Sjukhus
    Uddevalla, 45180, Sweden
  • Diabetesmottagningen, Uddevalla Sjukhus
    Uddevalla, 45180, Sweden
  • Barnmottagningen, Norrlands Universitetssjukhus
    Umeå, 901 85, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ludvigsson J, Wahlberg J, Casas R. Intralymphatic Injection of Autoantigen in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):697-699. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1616343. No abstract available. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx170010. PubMed 28199812 ↗
  • Ludvigsson J, Tavira B, Casas R. More on Intralymphatic Injection of Autoantigen in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):403-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1703468. No abstract available. PubMed 28745988 ↗
  • Nowak C, Lind M, Sumnik Z, Pelikanova T, Nattero-Chavez L, Lundberg E, Rica I, Martinez-Brocca MA, Ruiz de Adana M, Wahlberg J, Hanas R, Hernandez C, Clemente-Leon M, Gomez-Gila A, Ferrer Lozano M, Sas T, Pruhova S, Dietrich F, Puente-Marin S, Hannelius U, Casas R, Ludvigsson J. Intralymphatic GAD-Alum (Diamyd(R)) Improves Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes With HLA DR3-DQ2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Aug 18;107(9):2644-2651. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac343. PubMed 35665810 ↗
  • Ludvigsson J, Sumnik Z, Pelikanova T, Nattero Chavez L, Lundberg E, Rica I, Martinez-Brocca MA, Ruiz de Adana M, Wahlberg J, Katsarou A, Hanas R, Hernandez C, Clemente Leon M, Gomez-Gila A, Lind M, Lozano MF, Sas T, Samuelsson U, Pruhova S, Dietrich F, Puente Marin S, Nordlund A, Hannelius U, Casas R. Intralymphatic Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase With Vitamin D Supplementation in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb Trial. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1604-1612. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0318. Epub 2021 May 21. PubMed 34021020 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2020, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2023, 2 years 5 months after primary completion.

Of 50 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33. This study's 30 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Dec 20, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 13, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 27, 2021
Results first posted
Jan 9, 2023
Last update
Jan 9, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03345004
Lead sponsor
Diamyd Medical AB
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Dec 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 13, 2020
Completion
Apr 27, 2021
Results posted
Jan 9, 2023
Last update
Jan 9, 2023

Study contacts

Johnny Ludvigsson, MD, Prof
principal investigator · Universitetssjukhuset i Linköping

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Retogatein · Vitamin D

Start the discussion