ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03343639Updated May 20, 2021Results posted

Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Pruritus (Itch) With Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 2 interventional study of 5 mg Serlopitant Tablets and Matching Placebo Tablets in Pruritus and Psoriasis, sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc.. Completed at 39 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-20.

Sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
204
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 163 studies in Pruritus with a site in United States — 24 open to participants now, 28 under way, 8 of them phase 3. Pruritus · United States.

Enrollment
44th of 153
204 · median 70
Started
2017
with 10 others
Phase 2
60 of 163
6 open now
Registered
68th of 163
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 163
Vyne Therapeutics Inc.

Among the 163 studies in Pruritus with a site in United States, this one is the 44th largest by enrollment of the 153 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 11 that started in 2017, is one of 60 in phase 2, and was the 68th registered.

Pruritus

491 studies on the registry are indexed under Pruritus; 94 are open to participants now.

Browse Pruritus studies →

Open to participants now

24 of the 163 studies in Pruritus with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

19 more — sign in →

All 24 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 54 Pruritus studies recruiting now, 22 (41%) set no upper age limit and 24 (44%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 10 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 163 studies in Pruritus with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of serlopitant for the treatment of pruritus in adults with plaque psoriasis

03

Conditions studied

  • Pruritus
  • Psoriasis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, age 18-80 years at consent.
  2. Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months prior to randomization.

    a. Presence of plaque psoriasis in any anatomic location, covering ≤ 10% BSA in total, at the Screening and Baseline visits.

  3. Pruritus of at least 4 weeks' duration prior to the initial Screening visit, and throughout the screening period prior to randomization.
  4. Subjects must be willing to discontinue use of all psoriasis therapies other than the following, for the duration of the study: bland emollients (e.g., Cetaphil, Eucerin, Aquaphor) on any anatomic location; coal tar shampoos, limited to use on scalp.
  5. WI-NRS initial screening score consistent with severe pruritus.
  6. WI-NRS scores during the 2 weeks of screening consistent with sever pruritus.
  7. All female subjects who are of must be willing to practice highly effective (i.e., pregnancy prevention method with a failure rate of \< 1% per year) from the time of the initial Screening visit until 2 weeks after last dose of study drug.
  8. Weight ≥ 32 kg at the Screening and Baseline visits.
  9. Willing and able to complete daily eDiary entries within a consistent timeframe for the duration of the study.

    1. Subjects must have ≥ 80% eDiary completion rate during the two weeks of the screening period immediately prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior treatment with serlopitant.

    a. Prior treatment with other neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1-R) antagonists (e.g., aprepitant, fosaprepitant, rolapitant) is not allowed within 1 year prior to randomization.

  2. Clinical worsening of psoriasis in the opinion of the investigator (e.g., increase in affected BSA or severity requiring use of systemic psoriasis therapies) within 12 weeks prior to randomization.
  3. Predominance of non-plaque forms of psoriasis (e.g., guttate, drug-induced, pustular, erythrodermic).
  4. Presence of any concurrent medical condition that provides a clearly defined etiology for pruritus other than psoriasis. These include but are not limited to urticaria, atopic dermatitis or other dermatologic conditions, hepatic or renal disease, psychogenic pruritus, drug reaction, untreated hyperthyroidism, and infection.
  5. Treatment with systemic biologic therapies including but not limited to etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab, within 6 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomization.
  6. Treatment with systemic non-biologic psoriasis therapies, including but not limited to systemic , phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, cyclosporine, methotrexate, retinoids, hydroxyurea, mycophenolate mofetil, thioguanine, sirolimus, azathioprine, or fumaric acid derivatives, within 12 weeks prior to randomization.
  7. Treatment with any of the following therapies within 4 weeks prior to randomization:

    a. Any topical/local psoriasis therapies other than those permitted per inclusion #4, including but not limited to topical corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, calcineurin inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, non-shampoo forms of coal tar, salicylates, retinoids, anthralin, or excimer laser.

    i. Non-systemic corticosteroids that do not involve skin application (e.g., inhaled, intranasal, or intra-articular corticosteroids) will be permitted.

    b. Phototherapy, with or without psoralen. c. Use of an indoor tanning facility, or sun exposure likely to result in sunburn.

    d. Systemic therapies with recognized anti-pruritic properties including but not limited to H1 antihistamines, doxepin, mirtazapine, gabapentin, pregabalin, cannabinoids, and kappa opioid receptor agonists.

    e. Any topical anti-pruritic therapies, including but not limited to H1 antihistamines, doxepin, capsaicin, or medicated emollients (e.g., menthol or pramoxine).

    f. Strong inhibitors.

  8. Treatment with any therapy within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomization.
  9. Serum creatinine, total , (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2x the (ULN) during screening.
  10. History of within 5 years prior to randomization, with the exception of completely treated and non- basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  11. Presence of any of the following conditions meeting diagnostic criteria within 3 years prior to randomization: major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder, intellectual disability, severe alcohol use disorder, or other known psychiatric condition meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria which may confound the assessment of serlopitant safety or efficacy, compromise the safety of the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated activities.
  12. Suicidal ideation within 3 years prior to randomization, or history of suicide attempt at any time.
  13. Known active hepatitis infection.
  14. Known history of (HIV) infection.
  15. Documented history of parasitic infection, including skin parasites such as scabies, within 12 months prior to randomization.
  16. History of to serlopitant or any of its components.
  17. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding female subject.
  18. Presence of any medical condition or disability that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the assessment of serlopitant safety or efficacy, compromise the safety of the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated activities; this includes any screening abnormalities any may include some clinically significant screening laboratory abnormalities.

    a. Unless specifically excluded per exclusion #9, clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at screening which are unlikely to interfere with the assessment of safety or efficacy in this trial, compromise the safety of the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol mandated activities are permitted.

  19. Planned or anticipated major surgical procedure or other activity that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated assessments (e.g., extended international travel) during the subject's participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
204 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

    Serlopitant Tablets

    Drug: 5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching Placebo Tablets

    Placebo Tablets

    Drug: Matching Placebo Tablets

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 8

    Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. A 4-point responder is a subject who had at least a 4-point reduction in score between Baseline and Week 8.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 4

    Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. A 4-point responder is a subject who had at least a 4-point reduction in score between Baseline and Week 4.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 7

    Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The secondary outcome is the change in WI-NRS score at 7 days compared with Baseline.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to day 7

  3. Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 3

    Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The secondary outcome is the change in WI-NRS score at 3 days compared with Baseline.

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Results

Posted Jun 12, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Started102102
Completed8890
Not completed1412
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject106
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up45
Withdrew: Protocol violation01

Outcome measures

PrimaryWI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 8

Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. A 4-point responder is a subject who had at least a 4-point reduction in score between Baseline and Week 8.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · % of subjects (incl. imputed data)
WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 8
% of subjects (incl. imputed data)Serlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 833.2921.07
SecondaryWI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 4

Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. A 4-point responder is a subject who had at least a 4-point reduction in score between Baseline and Week 4.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 4
percentage of subjectsSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
WI-NRS 4-point Responder Rate at Week 420.7811.49
SecondaryChange in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 7

Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The secondary outcome is the change in WI-NRS score at 7 days compared with Baseline.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to day 7
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 7
units on a scaleSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 7-1.307 ± 1.8741-0.785 ± 1.8391
SecondaryChange in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 3

Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS). 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The secondary outcome is the change in WI-NRS score at 3 days compared with Baseline.

Time frame:
3 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 3
units on a scaleSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Change in WI-NRS From Baseline to Day 3-0.702 ± 1.4111-0.461 ± 1.4060

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were recorded from the first study drug administration through the Follow-up visit, for a total of approximately 10 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Serlopitant 5 mg0/102 (0%)0/102 (0%)9/102 (8.8%)
Placebo1/100 (1%)2/100 (2%)17/100 (17%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1021/100
Road traffic accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1021/100
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/1026/100
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/1025/100
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/1024/100
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/1023/100

Baseline characteristics

The populations here represent the Full Analysis Set, not all randomized subjects.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean48.2 ± 15.246.7 ± 12.3447.5 ± 13.84
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Female4862110
Male543993
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino293160
Not Hispanic or Latino7370143
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian347
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American12618
White8489173
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
United States102101203
WI-NRS
WI-NRS(units on a scale)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean8.303 ± 1.02778.082 ± 1.05888.193 ± 1.0466
08

Study locations

39 sites
  • Study Site 221
    Bryant, Arkansas 72022, United States
  • Study Site 220
    Beverly Hills, California 90212, United States
  • Study Site 204
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Study Site 356
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Study Site 202
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Study Site 215
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Study Site 376
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Study Site 212
    Clearwater, Florida 33761, United States
  • Study Site 210
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Study Site 331
    Miami, Florida 33144, United States
  • Study Site 348
    Miami, Florida 33165, United States
  • Study Site 222
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162, United States
  • Study Site 206
    Sanford, Florida 32771, United States
  • Study Site 213
    Boise, Idaho 83704, United States
  • Study Site 360
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Study Site 207
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Study Site 228
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Study Site 216
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • Study Site 506
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, United States
  • Study Site 219
    Clinton Township, Michigan 48038, United States
  • Study Site 209
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Study Site 371
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506, United States
  • Study Site 227
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Study Site 201
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Study Site 375
    Forest Hills, New York 11375, United States
  • Study Site 500
    New York, New York 10023, United States
  • Study Site 516
    Bexley, Ohio 43209, United States
  • Study Site 211
    Broomall, Pennsylvania 19008, United States
  • Study Site 345
    Johnston, Rhode Island 02919, United States
  • Study Site 205
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130, United States
  • Study Site 182
    College Station, Texas 77845, United States
  • Study Site 224
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Study Site 359
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Study Site 339
    Plano, Texas 75024, United States
  • Study Site 203
    San Antonio, Texas 78218, United States
  • Study Site 223
    Sugar Land, Texas 77479, United States
  • Study Site 226
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
  • Study Site 217
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Study Site 336
    Richmond, Virginia 23220, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pariser DM, Bagel J, Lebwohl M, Yosipovitch G, Chien E, Spellman MC. Serlopitant for psoriatic pruritus: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jun;82(6):1314-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.056. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PubMed 32007513 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2019, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 37 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Pruritus, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 21. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 52 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 23, 2018
CompletionActual
Nov 12, 2018
Results first posted
Jun 12, 2019
Last update
May 20, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03343639
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2018
Completion
Nov 12, 2018
Results posted
Jun 12, 2019
Last update
May 20, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Serlopitant

Start the discussion