ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07450716Updated Apr 13, 2026

Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Photobiomodulation for the Treatment of Pruritus

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Light-emitting diode (LED) Photobiomodulation (PBM) device and Placebo in Pruritus, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a low-level near-infrared LED light device for relieving itch. The device is non-invasive, does not break the skin, and does not produce heat. Near-infrared light has been used in other medical settings and is known to interact with skin and nerve pathways. In this study, researchers are examining whether this light can be safely applied to the skin and whether it may help reduce itch by affecting signals involved in itch sensation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pruritus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pruritus

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Pruritus; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 422 interventional studies indexed under Pruritus.

Browse Pruritus studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant is an adult at least 18 years-of-age.
  2. Participant meets the criteria for acute or chronic itch as defined below:

    1. Acute itch lasting less than 6 weeks.
    2. Chronic itch lasting more than 6 weeks.
  3. Participant is able and willing to comply with all the study visit, treatment, and evaluation schedules and requirements.
  4. Participant can understand and provide written .
  5. Participant does not have any concurrent injury or wound in their target treatment area.
  6. Participant is either untreated for their pruritus, or if on therapy, must have been maintained on a stable regimen of antipruritic treatments for the past 14 days prior to enrollment.
  7. Participant has mild, moderate, or severe pruritus as defined below:

    1. Mild: average score \<4 on the PP-NRS during the week before baseline.
    2. Moderate: average score 4-7 on the PP-NRS during the week before baseline.
    3. Severe: average score of > 7 on the PP-NRS during the week before baseline.
  8. Participants must have comparable pruritus affecting symmetrical or corresponding areas on both sides of their body to allow for the split-body study design.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has any active internal or cutaneous located within the proposed treatment area.
  2. Participant cannot provide or adhere to study schedule.
  3. Participant is actively tanning during the study course.
  4. Participant has melasma or another condition exacerbated by heat.
  5. Participant is on a photosensitizing medication, such as doxycycline or has a photosensitizing condition.
  6. Patient is currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
  7. Participant has psychogenic pruritus, a diagnosed skin-picking (excoriation) disorder, or any other current psychiatric condition that, in the investigator's judgment, could interfere with informed consent, adherence to the study protocol, or safe participation.
  8. Participant has any condition which, in the Investigator's opinion, would make it unsafe (for the participant or study personnel) to treat the participant as part of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching placebo

    Matching placebo delivered by placing the device above the skin without activating it.

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Low-Level Near-Infrared LED Light Treatment

    Near-infrared light treatment will be administered to an area on the body experiencing itch.

    Device: Light-emitting diode (LED) Photobiomodulation (PBM) device

Interventions

  • DeviceLight-emitting diode (LED) Photobiomodulation (PBM) device

    Near-infrared light treatment will be administered to an area on the body experiencing itch.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Matching placebo delivered by placing the device above the skin on an area contralateral to the treatment area without activating it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS)

    The primary endpoint is itch response, defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in the PP-NRS from baseline. The PP-NRS is an 11-point scale in which study participants are asked to rate their worst itch intensity during the previous 24 hours. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe itch. 0 indicates no itch and 10 indicates the "worst itch imaginable." Participants will complete the PP-NRS daily and then we will calculate the average over 7 days preceding the study visit. Scores recorded at each treatment visit represent an average from the prior day. After the final treatment visit, participants will be asked again to complete a daily PP-NRS the next day, and then daily for the next 7 days. The score from the final treatment visit, as well as the average post-treatment score one week later will be compared to their average baseline score, with a change in PP-NRS from baseline by 2 or more representing a meaningful improvement.

    Time frame: Once daily for 7 days prior to the first treatment visit; each treatment visit; once daily for 7 days after the final treatment visit--Days -7~6, Days 13~20.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS)

    The Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) is a validated, patient-reported instrument for assessing itch severity. It provides a simple, quantitative measure of pruritus at a given point in time. In this study, the P-NRS will be administered immediately before and 10 minutes after each intervention session. Scores range from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch), categorized as follows: 1-3 = mild, 4-6 = moderate, 7-8 = severe, and 9-10 = very severe itch. A reduction of 2 to 4 points from baseline is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: Twice per treatment visit (once immediately before treatment and once 10 minutes after treatment), Day 0~6.

  2. Itchy Quality of Life (ItchyQoL)

    ItchyQoL is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of chronic pruritus on quality of life across three domains: symptoms, functional limitations, and emotional well-being. The instrument includes 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never to 4 = all the time), with higher scores indicating greater pruritus-related impairment. Each answer is graded on a five-point scale, with higher total scores indicating greater pruritus-related quality of life impairment.

    Time frame: During the first treatment visit, the final treatment visit, and the follow-up visit: Day 0, Day 6, Day 13.

  3. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 Adverse Events

    The toxicity of grading will be assessed as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Any AEs will be rated from not present (\<grade 1) to present and mild (grade 1) to severe and requiring intervention (grade 4). For each of these categories, \> grade 2 requires treatment or impacts activities of daily living. AEs will be assessed based on interview +/- photography at baseline, all treatment visits, as well as 1 week after the last treatment. The frequency and severity of all AEs deemed at least possibly related to the treatment or placebo modality will be recorded.

    Time frame: From Enrollment to Day 13.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    • Clinical Research Coordinator · Contactwellmancrc@partners.org · 617-724-2168
    • Margaret Chou, MD · Sub investigator
    • Bridget Myers, MD · Sub investigator
    • Richard R. Anderson, MD · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 8 months later.

Of 21 phase 1 interventional studies under Pruritus, half reached primary completion within 6 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 14. This study's planned 8 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2026
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
StartEst.
Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Apr 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07450716
Responsible party
Richard Rox Anderson, MD (Director, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Research Coordinator
Contact
wellmancrc@partners.org
617-724-2168
Margaret Chou, MD
Contact
mchou3@mgh.harvard.edu
862-242-4535
Richard R. Anderson, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion