ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03337438Updated Oct 30, 2019

Alcohol and Health: Personalized Feedback

An interventional study of Personalized Feedback Intervention with Values and Personalized Feedback Intervention Traditional in Alcohol Drinking and Alcohol Consumption, Youth, sponsored by Oklahoma State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-30.

Primary conditionUnderage DrinkingRegistry: Alcohol DrinkingReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Alcohol Drinking — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Underage Drinking
Why
  1. Alcohol Drinking is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Underage Drinking, a narrower term within Alcohol Drinking.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Oklahoma State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
320
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heavy episodic drinking (HED) among college students remains a concern within the U.S., as rates of HED are still high in this population. Though a variety of brief motivational interventions for alcohol use in college students have demonstrated significant effects, these effects are often small and not consistently maintained over time. Personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) are a particularly promising approach, as these are often acceptable to college students, as well as low-cost, and easy to disseminate. Though presentation of interperson discrepancy via descriptive and injunctive norms has shown consistent effects within PFIs and received much attention in the literature, intraperson, or ideal-actual self discrepancies, has largely been ignored. Drawing from cognitive dissonance theory, self-regulation theory, and motivational interviewing, the current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an alcohol PFI with a values component to incorporate ideal-self discrepancy into a typical intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Drinking
  • Alcohol Consumption, Youth

Browse trials for

03

In context

Underage Drinking Reclassified

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 320 is below the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

Oklahoma State University is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Compared within Underage Drinking, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Alcohol Drinking. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Must be able to speak and read English
  • Must report consuming alcohol in a typical week over the past month

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must not deny drinking within the past month
  • Non-English speaking
  • Under the age of 18
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
320 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Values-PFI

    Other: Personalized Feedback Intervention with Values

  • Other
    Traditional-PFI with values assessment

    Other: Personalized Feedback Intervention Traditional

  • Other
    Traditional PFI no values assessment

    Other: Personalized Feedback Intervention Traditional

Interventions

  • OtherPersonalized Feedback Intervention with Values

    The PFI with values will include information commonly included in personalized feedback interventions for alcohol use, such as norms information and drinking profile, as well as feedback on three of the assessed values that are highly important to the participant.

  • OtherPersonalized Feedback Intervention Traditional

    This PFI will include information on drinking profile, norms, behavioral strategies used while drinking, and practical costs related to drinking reframed as monetary values and caloric values.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Alcohol consumption

    measured by drinks per week

    Time frame: one-month post baseline

  2. Alcohol consequences

    measured by the BYAACQ to determine number of consequences experienced in the past month post-baseline

    Time frame: one month post-baseline

  3. Value-behavior discrepancy for values related to alcohol use

    Measured by the VLQ-A to measure change in behavioral consistency with values specifically related to alcohol use one month post-baseline

    Time frame: one month post-baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of norms

    Perceptions of descriptive norms will be more accurate one month post-baseline

    Time frame: one month post-baseline

  2. Trait mindfulness

    Levels of mindfulness as measured by the FFMQ will be measured at both time points

    Time frame: one month post-baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • North Murray Hall Oklahoma State University
    Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03337438
Lead sponsor
Oklahoma State University
Responsible party
Emma Brett (Graduate Student, Oklahoma State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2017
Start date
Oct 22, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 29, 2019
Completion
Oct 29, 2019
Last update
Oct 30, 2019

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion