A Phase 3 interventional study of Amitriptyline and Placebo oral capsule in Pain, Neuropathic, Leprosy and Leprosy Neuropathy, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-23.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Despite large efforts to eradicate leprosy, this curable mycobacterial infection still affects 250,000 new individuals annually. Half of the globe's leprosy patients live in Brazil and India. In 2013, 33,033 new leprosy cases diagnosed in Brazil, with an average incidence of 1.05 cases / 10 000 inhabitants. Recently a new concept of care after cure has called attention for severe pain in previously treated patients, particularly, neuropathic pain. Even so, until now no single drug has been studied for the treatment of pain in this patients, and the use of drugs is based on the study of other diseases. We designed the first placebo-controlled, double blinded randomized trial in the use of flexible-dose amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) for the treatment of neuropathic pain related to leprosy
Despite large efforts to eradicate leprosy, this curable mycobacterial infection still affects 250,000 new individuals annually. Half of the globe's leprosy patients live in Brazil and India. In 2013, 33,033 new leprosy cases diagnosed in Brazil, with an average incidence of 1.05 cases / 10 000 inhabitants. Most new cases occur in economically restricted regions of the world, but because at least 5% of the general population is genetically susceptible to the causative agent, new cases may occur anywhere worldwide. This is especially true in times of high human geographic dislocation. Thus, leprosy should rank among the differential diagnosis list of general practitioners and specialists treating skin and peripheral nerve disorders even in non-endemic areas.
Mycobacterium leprae is an obligatory intracellular bacterium that invades macrophages and Schwann cells. Although myelinating Schwann cells are relatively resistant to invasion, viable M. leprae cause marked myelin destruction and lead to secondary neuronal phenotypic changes, degeneration, and nerve dysfunction.
Leprosy patients have historically been characterized by cutaneous insensibility in body areas of deformity, and the presence of pain in these patients has been neglected for a long time. It has only been recently acknowledged that leprosy can be associated with pain in general and neuropathic pain in particular. Leprosy patients frequently experience neuropathy in wide areas of the body, which may or may not present with pain. When pain exists, it may be acute or chronic, neuropathic or inflammatory. Leprosy has different clinical presentations (according to the host's innate immune response) that range from localized skin lesions and adjacent intra-epidermal nerve fiber injury to widespread neuropathy distributed in large areas of low body-surface temperature. Neuropathic pain in leprosy may affect 11-22% of patients, and up to 56% of those with chronic pain. Importantly, more than 85% of patients with leprosy-related neuropathic pain developed it after the end of the antimicrobial treatment period. This means that the majority of patients who developed neuropathic pain did so after they were formally cured of the disease, and, in many cases, discharged from medical assistance. Therefore, pain in leprosy can also be inserted as part of the "care after cure" program initiative, along with stigma, deformity and incapacity management strategies.
In recent years several easy-to use screening tools have been developed to screen for neuropathic pain in leprosy patients, such as the douleur neuropathique-4 (DN-4) and others. These tools allow for the rapid (usually 20 seconds to administer) and reliable (high sensitivity) assessment of pain in leprosy patients.
Additionally, very few reports have described he effects of treatment used for neuropathic pain in these patients, and no clinical trials have been conducted for this specific condition to date. One could argue that leprosy patients with neuropathic pain should respond to usual drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants (and they usually do), but the selection of the appropriate treatment regimen, the proper timing of treatment initiation and the most cost-effective drug is not an obvious task. Also, and very important, the lack of formal evidence-based data attesting the efficacy of tricyclics and anticonvulsants for the treatment of leprosy associated neuropathic pain hampers further a wider availability of these drugs in economically-restricted areas. All these limitations can be overcome if the current scientific interest in pain in leprosy is maintained and the present high-level research in the area continues to grow similarly to the previous decades.
Here we designed the first placebo-controlled, double blinded randomized trial in the use of flexible-dose amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) for the treatment of neuropathic pain related to leprosy. This study is currently approved by our local Ethics Review Board (CAAE: 45393415.9.0000.0068) and has stared the recruitment phase on March 2017.
Recruitment time will be extended by 12 months due to dropouts related to the Covid pandemic. We have had dropouts due to a few patients developing covid and also due to patients having fear to become infected while attending hospital visits."
1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 52 across 831 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.
Browse Neuralgia studies →University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,035 studies on the registry; 95 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients on this arm will receive amitriptyline on flexible doses, starting from 25mg (1 capsule) and titrated to 50mg (2 capsules) or 75mg (3 capsules), based on brief pain inventory (BPI) questionnaire, applied weekly for 3 consecutive weeks. All patients will receive tramadol as a supportive drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain, they are instructed to take 50mg every 8 hours, if pain present.
Drug: Amitriptyline · Drug: Tramadol
Patients on this arm will receive placebo on flexible doses, starting from 1 capsule and titrated to 2 capsules or 3 capsules, based on brief pain inventory (BPI) questionnaire, applied weekly for 3 consecutive weeks. All patients will receive tramadol as a supportive drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain, they are instructed to take 50mg every 8 hours, if pain present.
Drug: Placebo oral capsule · Drug: Tramadol
Administer amitriptyline on flexible doses variating from 25mg to 75mg, with backup of tramadol, and evaluate the reduction of the pain based on the Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire.
Administer amitriptyline on flexible doses variating from 1 to 3 capsules, with backup of tramadol, and evaluate the reduction of the pain based on the Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire.
Administer to both arms on "as needed" scheme, to a maximum of 150mg/day.
Reduction in pain intensity of 30% from baseline measured by verbal analog scale (VAS)
To evaluate the analgesic effect of amitriptyline in flexible dose in patients with neuropathic pain associated with leprosy compared to placebo on the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) (range 100mm- minimum 0 and maximum 100)
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Neuropathic pain
DN4 (douleur neuropathique 4) + (≥ 4/10)
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms
To assess the effectiveness of amitriptyline on the reduction of painful symptoms, and on neuropathic dimensions evaluated by the NPSI questionnaire (minimum 0 and maximum 100)
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Mensure Quality of Life
To assess the impact of amitriptyline on the patient's quality of life, depressive and anxiety symptoms, quality of sleep, through the WHOQOL questionnaire (range 0 to 100).
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
To evaluate the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.03 score 0/1 vs 2/3/4
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Predictive factor of response
assess whether pain phenotype A (NPSI baseline score \<15) responded differently to the active drug compared to phenotype B (NPSI score at baseline ≥ 15)
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Use of backup pain medication
To assess the difference in dosage of rescue medication (tramadol) between both treatment arms, by counting the number of pills of tramadol used by each patient.
Time frame: 63 days (9 weeks)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in May 2021, 50 months.
Of 33 phase 3 interventional studies under Neuralgia, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42. This study's 50 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Amitriptyline