ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03315208ARMS UPUpdated Apr 1, 2021Results posted

Study of a Transdiagnostic, Emotion-focused Group Intervention for Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders

An interventional study of Unified Protocol (UP) and Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Substance Use Disorders, Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 26 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-01.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 26 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of this pilot study is to conduct a preliminary trial to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of adding a transdiagnostic, emotion-focused group intervention (the Unified Protocol, UP) to treatment as usual (TAU) in a comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders and emotional distress. Only patients seeking services or engaged in care at an existing outpatient program at MGH (the Addiction Recovery Management Service) are eligible for participation.

Read the detailed description

Young adults with substance use disorder (SUD) commonly experience co-occurring emotional distress in the form of affective/emotional disorders (i.e. anxiety, depressive, and related disorders) and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). Based on the conceptualization of emotion dysregulation as a transdiagnostic treatment target, the current study utilizes the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) to target core psychopathological processes related to emotion dysregulation that underlie SITBs and emotional disorder pathology. Given its transdiagnostic format, the UP has the potential to address comorbidity among the emotional disorders (and other functionally similar problems such as SUDs) simultaneously and more comprehensively than single-diagnosis treatments.

Patients seeking services or currently engaged in care at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders (the MGH Addiction Recovery Management Service) are eligible for this study. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive either UP + TAU or TAU alone. The adjunctive UP intervention consists of 16 twice-weekly group sessions (delivered over an 8-week period) designed to deliver transdiagnostic, emotion-focused CBT strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Substance Use Disorders
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Emotional Disorder
  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Suicidal and Self-injurious Behavior

Keywords

  • transdiagnostic treatment
  • cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Unified Protocol
  • young adults
  • substance use disorder
  • emotional disorder
  • depression
  • anxiety
  • emotion dysregulation
  • self-injurious thoughts and behaviors
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,238 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 409 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 108 across 1,840 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Only patients seeking services or currently engaged in care at the MGH Addiction Recovery Management Service are eligible for this study.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Young adults ages 18 to 26, inclusive
  2. English language proficiency
  3. Ability to provide written,
  4. Ability to attend in-person, outpatient sessions
  5. Has provided consent to receive or is currently undergoing treatment at the MGH Addiction Recovery Management Service
  6. Documented SUD diagnosis (limited to alcohol use disorder; cannabis use disorder; phencyclidine or other hallucinogen use disorder; inhalant use disorder, opioid use disorder; sedative, hypnotic, or anxiolytic use disorder; stimulant use disorder; other (or unknown) SUD)
  7. Current elevated emotional distress, as evidenced by any one of the following:

    1. Score at least in the moderate range on self-report anxiety questionnaire
    2. Score at least in the moderate range on self-report depression questionnaire
    3. Report of suicidal thoughts in the past week
    4. Report of engagement in non-suicidal self-injury in the past week
  8. Not expected to require inpatient level of care within the next two weeks (as judged clinically)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented psychotic disorder (or current, psychotic symptoms) that render the patient inappropriate for outpatient level of care or participation in group therapy (as judged clinically by study staff)
  2. Current imminent suicide or homicide risk (as judged clinically by study staff)
  3. Unwilling or unable to provide consent for study staff to access subject's medical records and coordinate care and exchange data with clinical staff at the Addiction Recovery Management Service
  4. Unwilling or unable to identify an emergency contact
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual

    Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.

    Behavioral: Unified Protocol (UP) · Other: Treatment as Usual (TAU)

  • Active comparator
    Treatment As Usual Alone

    Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.

    Other: Treatment as Usual (TAU)

Interventions

  • BehavioralUnified Protocol (UP)

    The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.

  • OtherTreatment as Usual (TAU)

    Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU

    Participants in the UP condition will complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) at post-treatment to assess acceptability of and satisfaction with the experimental intervention. Range of the scale is 8 (minimum) to 32 (maximum), with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with treatment received.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  2. Feasibility of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU

    Percentage of participants who dropout from treatment during the 8 week study period in the UP+TAU condition will be compared to the percentage of those who drop out from treatment in the TAU condition.

    Time frame: 8-week treatment period

Secondary outcomes

  1. OASIS

    Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) administered at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  2. Depressive Symptoms Scale (ODSIS)

    Measured with the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  3. Suicidal Ideation

    Measured with the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSI) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate higher levels of suicidal ideation.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  4. Number of Participants Who Reported Nonsuicidal Self-injury in the Past Month

    Measured with the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) at post-treatment.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  5. Commitment to Sobriety

    Measured with the Commitment to Sobriety Scale (CSS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 5-30; higher scores indicate higher levels of commitment to sobriety.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  6. Substance Craving

    Measured with a three-item craving scale at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-27; higher scores indicate higher levels of substance craving.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

  7. Percentage of Past 30 Days Abstinent From Substances

    Operationalized with the percentage days abstinent (PDA) in the past 30 days, measured via Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) at post-treatment.

    Time frame: At the end of the 8-week treatment period

07

Results

Posted Apr 1, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Due to dropout, there were small numbers of participants analyzed at post-treatment.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from November 2017 to July 2019 from an outpatient treatment program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Started2918
Completed1612
Not completed136
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up116
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcceptability of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU

Participants in the UP condition will complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) at post-treatment to assess acceptability of and satisfaction with the experimental intervention. Range of the scale is 8 (minimum) to 32 (maximum), with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with treatment received.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Acceptability of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU
units on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
Acceptability of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU28.0 ± 4.6
PrimaryFeasibility of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU

Percentage of participants who dropout from treatment during the 8 week study period in the UP+TAU condition will be compared to the percentage of those who drop out from treatment in the TAU condition.

Time frame:
8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU
ParticipantsUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Feasibility of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU136
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = 0.63 · Chi-squared statistic value: 0.23df=1
SecondaryOASIS

Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) administered at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
OASIS
units on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
OASIS5.44 ± 2.806.82 ± 3.43
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.29 (p-value is for the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.) · Slope: 0.72The treatment condition effect was determined by the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.
SecondaryDepressive Symptoms Scale (ODSIS)

Measured with the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depressive Symptoms Scale (ODSIS)
score on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Depressive Symptoms Scale (ODSIS)6.06 ± 4.544.73 ± 3.93
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .50 (p-value is for the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.) · Slope: -0.56The treatment condition effect was determined by the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.
SecondarySuicidal Ideation

Measured with the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSI) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate higher levels of suicidal ideation.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Suicidal Ideation
score on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Suicidal Ideation2.88 ± 4.561.09 ± 2.47
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.45 (p-value is for the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.) · Slope: -1.96The treatment condition effect was determined by the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term. BSI scores were binarized (0 and \>=1) for this analysis due to the non-normal distribution of this outcome.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Nonsuicidal Self-injury in the Past Month

Measured with the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) at post-treatment.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Nonsuicidal Self-injury in the Past Month
ParticipantsUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Number of Participants Who Reported Nonsuicidal Self-injury in the Past Month10
SecondaryCommitment to Sobriety

Measured with the Commitment to Sobriety Scale (CSS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 5-30; higher scores indicate higher levels of commitment to sobriety.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Commitment to Sobriety
score on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Commitment to Sobriety16.88 ± 5.5517.27 ± 6.90
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.76 (p-value is for the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.) · Slope: -0.19The treatment condition effect was determined by the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.
SecondarySubstance Craving

Measured with a three-item craving scale at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-27; higher scores indicate higher levels of substance craving.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Substance Craving
score on a scaleUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Substance Craving12.88 ± 7.038.45 ± 6.01
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .21 (p-value is for the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term.) · Slope: -1.07The treatment condition effect was determined by the model parameter of the condition-by-time interaction term. Due to the non-normal distribution of the Craving Scale, scores on this measure were binarized (\< 15 and \>= 15) for this analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Past 30 Days Abstinent From Substances

Operationalized with the percentage days abstinent (PDA) in the past 30 days, measured via Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) at post-treatment.

Time frame:
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of past 30 days abstinent
Percentage of Past 30 Days Abstinent From Substances
percentage of past 30 days abstinentUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual Alone
Percentage of Past 30 Days Abstinent From Substances72.29 ± 28.7768.89 ± 21.41
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual vs Treatment As Usual Alone · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.77 · T statistic: 0.29

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual0/29 (0%)3/29 (10.3%)13/29 (44.8%)
Treatment As Usual Alone0/18 (0%)4/18 (22.2%)8/18 (44.4%)
Not Randomized0/9 (0%)2/9 (22.2%)0/9 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneNot Randomized
Active suicidal ideation with plan (resulting in inpatient treatment)Psychiatric disorders0/291/181/9
Pseudoseizure (resulting in emergency department visit)General disorders0/290/181/9
Relapse to substances (resulting in inpatient treatment)Psychiatric disorders2/291/180/9
Relapse to substances (resulting in emergency department visit))Psychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Increase in psychotic symptoms (resulting in inpatient treatment)Psychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Active suicidal ideation with plan (without inpatient treatment)Psychiatric disorders1/290/180/9
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent other events
EventUnified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneNot Randomized
Increased depressive symptomsPsychiatric disorders7/293/180/9
Increased suicidal ideation or urges to engage in nonsuicidal self-injuryPsychiatric disorders2/293/180/9
Increased anxiety-related symptomsPsychiatric disorders2/293/180/9
Relapse to substances (without medical attention)Psychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Entered intensive outpatient program for substance usePsychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Increased binge eatingPsychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Increased stress (not study-related)Psychiatric disorders0/291/180/9
Adverse reaction to non-study medicationGeneral disorders0/291/180/9
Headaches/migraineGeneral disorders1/291/180/9
Weight gainGeneral disorders0/291/180/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years291847
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Mean21.6 ± 2.121.6 ± 1.921.6 ± 1.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Female12820
Male171027
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Hispanic or Latino415
Not Hispanic or Latino251742
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian213
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American213
White221335
More than one race235
Unknown or Not Reported101
ODSIS
ODSIS(units on a scale)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Mean8.90 ± 5.189.06 ± 4.848.96 ± 5.00
PHQ-9
PHQ-9(units on a scale)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Mean12.69 ± 6.7912.89 ± 9.2812.77 ± 6.67
GAD-7
GAD-7(units on a scale)Unified Protocol + Treatment As UsualTreatment As Usual AloneTotal
Mean10.52 ± 5.139.28 ± 5.8510.04 ± 5.39

7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Addiction Recovery Management Service
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2019, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2021, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

Of 814 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Substance-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 53. This study's 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 854 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartActual
Nov 22, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 20, 2019
CompletionActual
Sep 20, 2019
Results first posted
Apr 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 1, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03315208
Responsible party
Kate Bentley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Nov 22, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2019
Completion
Sep 20, 2019
Results posted
Apr 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 1, 2021

Study contacts

Eden Evins, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion