ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03282591Updated May 20, 2021Results posted

Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic Cough

A Phase 2 interventional study of 5 mg Serlopitant Tablets and Matching Placebo Tablets in Refractory Chronic Cough, sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc.. Completed at 39 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-20.

Sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
185
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 44 studies in Chronic Cough with a site in United States — 9 open to participants now, 11 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Chronic Cough · United States.

Enrollment
11th of 37
185 · median 50
Started
2017
the only one that year
Phase 2
16 of 44
3 open now
Registered
11th of 44
by date

Among the 44 studies in Chronic Cough with a site in United States, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment of the 37 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 16 in phase 2, and was the 11th registered.

Chronic Cough

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Cough; 39 are open to participants now.

Browse Chronic Cough studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 44 studies in Chronic Cough with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

4 more — sign in →

All 9 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 30 Chronic Cough studies recruiting now, 10 (33%) set no upper age limit and 11 (37%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 44 studies in Chronic Cough with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of serlopitant for the treatment of refractory chronic cough

03

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Chronic Cough

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female and males between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Have a diagnosis of treatment chronic cough or unexplained cough for at least one year
  • Chest radiograph or computed tomography (CT) Thorax within the last 5 years not demonstrating any abnormality considered to be significantly contributing to the chronic cough
  • At Screening have a score of ≥ 40mm on the Cough Severity VAS
  • At Baseline (Day 0) have a score of ≥ 40mm on the Cough Severity VAS
  • All female subjects who are of must practice highly effective (i.e., pregnancy prevention method with a failure rate of \< 1% per year) from the time of the initial screening visit until 4 weeks after last dose of study drug. Please refer to the protocol for acceptable methods of contraception

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with serlopitant or other NK1-R antagonist
  • Presence of any medical condition or disability that could interfere with study
  • History of to serlopitant or any of its components
  • Currently pregnant or male partner of pregnant female
  • Females of who are unable or unwilling to use adequate or who are breast feeding
  • Current smoker or individuals who have given up smoking within the past 12 months
  • /FVC \< 60%
  • (BMI) \<18 kg/m2 or ≥ 40 kg/m2 at Screening
  • History of upper or lower respiratory tract infection or recent significant change in pulmonary status within 4 weeks of the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
  • History of cystic fibrosis
  • History of opioid use within 1 week of the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
  • Requiring concomitant therapy with prohibited medications
  • Treatment with biologic therapies within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0), whichever is longer
  • Treatment with strong inhibitors within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
  • Treatment with any therapy within 4 weeks (investigational biologic therapies within 8 weeks) prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
  • Serum creatinine, total , (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2x the (ULN) during screening
  • Positive test for any drug of abuse
  • History of within 5 years prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0), with the exception of completely treated and non- basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
  • Any known psychiatric diagnosis meeting criteria which may confound the assessment of serlopitant safety or efficacy, or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated activities, within 3 years prior to randomization. Examples of such DSM-5 diagnoses include but are not limited to major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder, intellectual disability, severe alcohol use disorder.
  • Known active hepatitis infection
  • Known history of (HIV) infection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
185 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

    Serlopitant Tablets

    Drug: 5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching Placebo Tablets

    Placebo Tablets

    Drug: Matching Placebo Tablets

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency (Log Normalized Percent Change Relative to Placebo)

    Change in 24-hour objective cough frequency is total number of cough events during the monitoring period (24-hour interval)/24 (Total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period) which is captured through sound recordings by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

    Time frame: from Baseline to Day 84

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency

    Awake cough frequency = (total number of cough events during the monitoring period (24-hour interval) the subject is awake)/(Total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the subject is awake) which is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

    Time frame: from Baseline to Day 84

  2. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 30% of reduction from baseline in 24-hour cough frequency is the number of participants with ≤-30% change in 24-hour cough frequency divided by the total number of participants with available data. This data is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

    Time frame: from Baseline to Day 84

  3. Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Awake Objective Cough Frequency

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 30% of reduction from baseline in the awake cough frequency is the number of participants with ≤30% change in awake cough frequency divided by the total number of participants with available data. This data is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

    Time frame: from Baseline to Day 84

  4. Change From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 101-point scale ranging from 0 (no cough) to 100 (worst cough). A higher score corresponds to higher cough severity.

    Time frame: from Baseline to Day 84

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Started9293
Completed8889
Not completed44

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency (Log Normalized Percent Change Relative to Placebo)

Change in 24-hour objective cough frequency is total number of cough events during the monitoring period (24-hour interval)/24 (Total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period) which is captured through sound recordings by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

Time frame:
from Baseline to Day 84
Reported as:
Least squares mean · coughs/hr
Change in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency (Log Normalized Percent Change Relative to Placebo)
coughs/hrSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Change in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency (Log Normalized Percent Change Relative to Placebo)-0.18 ± 0.09-0.45 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Serlopitant 5 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9942 · Mean difference (final values): 31.4
SecondaryChange in Awake Objective Cough Frequency

Awake cough frequency = (total number of cough events during the monitoring period (24-hour interval) the subject is awake)/(Total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period the subject is awake) which is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

Time frame:
from Baseline to Day 84
Reported as:
Least squares mean · coughs/hr
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency
coughs/hrSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Day 28 (Week 4)-0.12 (-0.26 to 0.01)-0.30 (-0.43 to -0.17)
Day 56 (Week 8)-0.25 (-0.39 to -0.10)-0.32 (-0.47 to -0.18)
Day 84 (Week 12)-0.19 (-0.34 to -0.04)-0.46 (-0.60 to -0.31)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency

The percentage of participants with ≥ 30% of reduction from baseline in 24-hour cough frequency is the number of participants with ≤-30% change in 24-hour cough frequency divided by the total number of participants with available data. This data is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

Time frame:
from Baseline to Day 84
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency
Percentage of participantsSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction in 24-hour Objective Cough Frequency71.490.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Awake Objective Cough Frequency

The percentage of participants with ≥ 30% of reduction from baseline in the awake cough frequency is the number of participants with ≤30% change in awake cough frequency divided by the total number of participants with available data. This data is captured by a custom-built digital recording device (VitaloJAK, Vitalograph, Ltd).

Time frame:
from Baseline to Day 84
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Awake Objective Cough Frequency
percentage of participantsSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Awake Objective Cough Frequency32.637.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 101-point scale ranging from 0 (no cough) to 100 (worst cough). A higher score corresponds to higher cough severity.

Time frame:
from Baseline to Day 84
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
Day 28 (Week 4)-10.2 (-14.6 to -5.8)-9.9 (-14.4 to -5.5)
Day 56 (Week 8)-14.6 (-19.4 to -9.8)-7.4 (-12.3 to -2.5)
Day 84 (Week 12)-14.2 (-19.2 to -9.3)-9.9 (-15.0 to -4.9)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were recorded from the first study drug administration through the follow-up visit at approximately Day 112 (± 3 days). After the Follow-Up visit, only SAEs that are believed to be drug related will be reported, without a specific end time.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Serlopitant 5 mg1/92 (1.1%)3/92 (3.3%)43/92 (46.7%)
Placebo0/92 (0%)3/92 (3.3%)28/92 (30.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
UrosepsisInfections and infestations0/921/92
NephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders0/921/92
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/921/92
Post procedural infectionInfections and infestations0/921/92
Metastatic malignant melanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/921/92
Pelvic painReproductive system and breast disorders1/920/92
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/920/92
SepsisInfections and infestations1/920/92
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/920/92
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventSerlopitant 5 mgPlacebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/928/92
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations7/926/92
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations6/923/92
FatigueGeneral disorders5/926/92
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/926/92
BronchitisInfections and infestations5/921/92
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/923/92
DizzinessNervous system disorders4/921/92
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/920/92
SinusitisInfections and infestations4/924/92

Baseline characteristics

These figures represent the Full Analysis set (FAS) and is defined as all randomized subjects who received any amount of study treatment and had Baseline and at least one post baseline observation of the primary endpoint during the treatment period.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean62.7 ± 11.2162.6 ± 10.0962.6 ± 10.63
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Median65.5 (28 to 79)64.5 (26 to 80)65 (26 to 80)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Female6867135
Male202141
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino516
Not Hispanic or Latino8387170
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American347
White8383166
More than one raceNANANA
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Serlopitant 5 mgPlaceboTotal
United States6968137
United Kingdom192039
08

Study locations

39 sites
  • Study Site 130
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Study Site 128
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Study Site 123
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Study Site 127
    San Jose, California 95117, United States
  • Study Site 131
    Stockton, California 95207, United States
  • Study Site 106
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Study Site 113
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Study Site 108
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Study Site 118
    Largo, Florida 33778, United States
  • Study Site 107
    Winter Park, Florida 32789, United States
  • Study Site 115
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55441, United States
  • Study Site 110
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Study Site 121
    Ocean Township, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • Study Site 125
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • Study Site 129
    Charleston, North Carolina 29420, United States
  • Study Site 103
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
  • Study Site 111
    Gastonia, North Carolina 28054, United States
  • Study Site 114
    Mooresville, North Carolina 28117, United States
  • Study Site 122
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • Study Site 112
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Study Site 117
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Study Site 116
    Portland, Oregon 97202, United States
  • Study Site 104
    Rock Hill, South Carolina 29732, United States
  • Study Site 102
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Study Site 120
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Study Site 101
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Study Site 109
    Waco, Texas 76712, United States
  • Study Site 126
    Bellingham, Washington 98225, United States
  • Study Site 105
    Greenfield, Wisconsin 53228, United States
  • Study Site 133
    Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 139
    Birmingham, B9 5SS, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 136
    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 141
    Llanelli, SA14 8QF, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 138
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 137
    London, SW3 6HP, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 132
    Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 135
    Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 134
    Preston, PR2 9HT, United Kingdom
  • Study Site 140
    Taunton, TA2 5DA, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2019, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 25 phase 2 interventional studies under Chronic Cough, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 21. This study's 10 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 11, 2017
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
StartActual
Oct 3, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Sep 6, 2018
Results first posted
Oct 22, 2019
Last update
May 20, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03282591
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Oct 3, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2018
Completion
Sep 6, 2018
Results posted
Oct 22, 2019
Last update
May 20, 2021

Study contacts

Jacky Smith
principal investigator · University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Serlopitant

Start the discussion