CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03279588Updated May 10, 2019

Diagnostic Accuracy of Bedside Ultrasound in Suspected Acute Diverticulitis

An observational study in Acute Diverticulitis and Abdominal Pain, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi. Completed at 4 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-10.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colonic diverticulitis is a common clinical condition in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with abdominal pain. The diagnosis and staging of patients with suspected acute diverticulitis is often made by CT imaging with intravenous contrast, which involves radiation exposure, is expensive and has contraindications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and role of bedside abdominal US for the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis

Read the detailed description

Colonic diverticulitis is a common clinical condition; about 20% of patients with colonic diverticulosis experience abdominal symptoms and, eventually, complications such as episodes of diverticulitis or bleeding. The distinction between patients with uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis affects the clinical management: medical therapy for the first, interventional therapy for the latter. CT imaging with intravenous contrast has become the gold standard in the diagnosis and staging of patients with suspected acute diverticulitis but, unfortunately, CT involves radiation exposure, is expensive and has contraindications. UltraSound (US) is a real-time dynamic examination with wide availability and easy accessibility and may be useful in diagnosing and managing critically ill patients who cannot be moved to CT. In a recent meta-analysis, US exam performed by Radiologists showed a pooled sensitivity of 90% (vs 95% for CT, p = 0.86) and a specificity of 90% (vs 96% for CT, p = 0.04). US is increasingly used at bedside to rapidly assess patients presenting to the Emergency Department. No previous studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal US performed by physician at bedside as an extension of physical examination. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of bedside abdominal US.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Diverticulitis
  • Abdominal Pain

Keywords

  • Ultrasound diagnosis
  • Abdominal Ultrasound
  • Emergency Department
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Every patient presenting with symptoms suspected of diverticular disease to the Emergency Department of four Italian hospitals will be considered eligible for the study

Inclusion criteria

  • informed consent obtained
  • patients with abdominal pain presenting to the Emergency Department with a suspicon of diverticular disease, in whom the tutor physician orders an imaging study (abdominal CT or abdominal US performed by the Radiologist)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no ultrasonographer physician who can perform bedside abdominal US is present
  • the patient does not undergo imaging study
  • clinical conditions of the patient are particularly severe, preventing an adequate enrollment
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBedside Ultrasound

    Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain suspected of acute diverticulitis are evaluated with standard care by an Emergency Physician (tutor); at the time the tutor requests an imaging test performed by Radiologist (CT scan or US scan), he notifies another physicians skilled in bedside abdominal US (ultrasonographer), who evaluates the patient and performs the US scan. Ultrasonographer after completation of US and knowing blood samples results fills in a standardized form reporting the diagnostic hypotesis, the need for additional work-up (if deemed necessary), and the disposition of the patient. The standardized form completed by the ultrasonographer will be compared with the actual management of the patient.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of bedside abdominal US performed by Emergency Physicians for the diagnosis and stratification of acute diverticulitis

    Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, negative and positive likelihood ratio of bedside abdominal US performed by Emergency Physicians for the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Management of patient

    To evaluate the reliability of the management proposed by the ultrasonographer on the basis of clinical, laboratoristic and ultrasonographic data.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Time reduction

    To evaluate if the use of bedside abdominal US performed by Emergency Physicians can reduce the time needed for the diagnosis

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. CT scan reduction

    To evaluate if the use of bedside abdominal US performed by Emergency Physicians can raduce the number of CT scans performed in patients with suspected acute diverticulitis

    Time frame: 30 days

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • Department of Emergency Medicine
    Figline Valdarno, Firenze, Italy
  • Emergency Department Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Tuscany 50134, Italy
  • Emergency Department ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
    Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Emergency Department Nuovo Ospedale di Prato
    Prato, 59100, Italy
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Griffiths EA, Abu-Zidan FM, Di Saverio S, Ulrych J, Kluger Y, Ben-Ishay O, Moore FA, Ivatury RR, Coimbra R, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Chiara O, Kashuk J, Sakakushev B, Weber DG, Latifi R, Biffl W, Bala M, Karamarkovic A, Inaba K, Ordonez CA, Hecker A, Augustin G, Demetrashvili Z, Melo RB, Marwah S, Zachariah SK, Shelat VG, McFarlane M, Rems M, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Junior GA, Negoi I, Cui Y, Sato N, Vereczkei A, Bellanova G, Birindelli A, Di Carlo I, Kok KY, Gachabayov M, Gkiokas G, Bouliaris K, Colak E, Isik A, Rios-Cruz D, Soto R, Moore EE. WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 29;11:37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0095-0. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27478494 ↗
  • Cuomo R, Barbara G, Pace F, Annese V, Bassotti G, Binda GA, Casetti T, Colecchia A, Festi D, Fiocca R, Laghi A, Maconi G, Nascimbeni R, Scarpignato C, Villanacci V, Annibale B. Italian consensus conference for colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Oct;2(5):413-42. doi: 10.1177/2050640614547068. PubMed 25360320 ↗
  • Andeweg CS, Wegdam JA, Groenewoud J, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Toward an evidence-based step-up approach in diagnosing diverticulitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):775-84. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.908475. Epub 2014 May 30. PubMed 24874087 ↗
  • Lameris W, van Randen A, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2498-511. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1018-6. Epub 2008 Jun 4. PubMed 18523784 ↗
  • Liljegren G, Chabok A, Wickbom M, Smedh K, Nilsson K. Acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;9(6):480-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01238.x. PubMed 17573739 ↗
  • Mazzei MA, Cioffi Squitieri N, Guerrini S, Stabile Ianora AA, Cagini L, Macarini L, Giganti M, Volterrani L. Sigmoid diverticulitis: US findings. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013 Jul 15;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-S1-S5. Epub 2013 Jul 15. PubMed 23902791 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03279588
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Responsible party
Peiman Nazerian (Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Start date
May 20, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2018
Completion
Dec 20, 2018
Last update
May 10, 2019

Study contacts

Peiman Nazerian, MD
principal investigator · Emergency Departmet Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion