CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03261089SPAREUpdated Dec 24, 2025

Neuroprognostication Bias: A Collaboration to Reduce the Impact of Self-fulfilling Prophecy in Cardiac ARrEst

An observational study in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Boston Medical Center. Recruiting at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-24.

Sponsored by Boston Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Mortality rates of cardiac arrest range from 60-85%, and approximately 80% of survivors are initially comatose. Of those who survive, 50% are left with a permanent neurological disability, and only 10% are able to resume their former lifestyle. Early prognosis of comatose patients after cardiac arrest is critical for management of these patients, yet predicting outcome for these patients remains quite challenging.

The primary study objective of SPARE is to assess the value of using a systematic, multi-modal approach for neuroprognostication in the unconscious post-cardiac arrest population. We hypothesize that prognostication using this approach will be significantly improved compared to historical controls. This approach will be novel because:

All patients who are unconscious at least 24 hours post-cardiac arrest, whereas previous studies on neurologic outcome tended to have restrictive inclusion criteria, such as no pre-existing neurologic impairment (e.g. dementia or prior cerebrovascular injury), or included an unduly restrictive population, such as patients with a strictly comatose state.

The prognostic modalities used to assess patients will be applied at specific time points that will maximize their utility.

Patients' families and clinicians will be encouraged to provide adequate time to allow for a delayed recovery, especially in cases of uncertain outcome, thus minimizing the self-fulfilling prophesy bias of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST). This will be particularly pertinent in the comparison of US and Brazil/Italy patients, as the Brazilian and Italian populations are not commonly exposed to premature WLST (as can be the case in the US), one of the major sources of biases in prognostication studies of cardiac arrest due to the self-fulfilling prophecy.

Read the detailed description

SPARE is a multi-center, international, prospective registry designed to evaluate the use of a multi-modality approach to neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest. Subjects will be evaluated with standard, accepted, and widely available assessment modalities, including clinical examination, neurophysiologic (electroencephalography and evoked potentials (per site standard of care), serum biomarkers (per site standard of care), and neuroimaging testing.

The purpose of this study is to collect data from a prospective large-scale cohort involving cardiac arrest survivors, and the clinical characteristics and prognostic features that affect their neurologic outcome. The ultimate goal is to derive a prediction model for neuroprognostication in cardiac arrest, using multiple clinical modalities that are already clinically in use, but in a standardized fashion. We hypothesize that by using a multimodal approach combining clinical assessment tools obtained at standardized time points, we will improve the accuracy of neuroprognostication in initially unconscious cardiac arrest survivors. The US and non-US populations will be compared, as the non-US population is less exposed to early WLST, thus eliminating the self-fulfilling prophecy bias that has plagued all CA studies to date.

Outcomes will be assessed at discharge, at 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards. The primary outcome will be the proportion of subjects with good versus poor outcome, with a dichotomized approach of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS): good outcome defined as mRS scores of 0-3, and poor outcome as mRS scores of 4-6. Secondary outcome measures include overall scores on the Cerebral Performance Category Scale (CPC), Cerebral Performance Category - Extended (CPC-E), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) (or Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MOCA)).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cardiac arrest
  • neuroprognostication
  • coma
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Unresponsive patients post-cardiac arrest

Inclusion criteria

  • Initially unconscious following cardiac arrest from any non-perfusing rhythm (i.e., ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, asystole)
  • Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) as defined by maintained spontaneous circulation for at least 20 minutes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Isolated respiratory arrest without concomitant or ensuing cardiac arrest

04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Unresponsive patients post-cardiac arrest

    As early as possible post-resuscitation, patients should undergo a detailed neurologic examination, comprised of a thorough assessment for consciousness and detailed cranial nerve function and motor response assessments. Neurologic assessment scores such as the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) Score will be also be used. On the first assessment (day of cardiac arrest), the PCAC score should be assigned only on the basis of the best neurologic exam in the first 6 hours after ROSC. Patients that are sedated or intubated will have the verbal score of GCS be estimated by a derivation of motor and eye scores. The presence of potential confounders, including core body temperature, medications, and/or intoxicants, as well as metabolic derangements will be noted.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. modified Rankin Score (mRS)

    A 7-point scale that measures the level of disability or impairment. mRS 0-3 is considered a good outcome while mRS is considered a poor outcome

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cerebral Performance Category Scale (CPC)

    A scale from 1-5 assessing brain function and used to gauge neurological recovery. CPC 1 or 2 is considered good outcome while CPC 3-5 is considered poor outcome

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

  2. Cerebral Performance Category- Extended (CPC-E)

    An advanced multi-domain tool used to assess the detailed neurological and functional recovery.

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

  3. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

    A Screening tool for cognitive impairment. Score from 0-30

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

  4. Short Form 36

    A 36 item patient reported survey used to measure health status and quality of life.

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

  5. Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E)

    An 8-point scale used to measure global disability and functional outcome

    Time frame: 14 days, 3 months post-arrest, 6 months, and annually up to 5 years afterwards

06

Study locations

8 of 8 sites recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
    • Edilberto Amorim de Cerqueira, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Yale University
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
    • Emily Gilmore, MD · Principal investigator
    • Rachel Beekman, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
    • Carolina Maciel, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
    • · Contact · dgreer@bu.edu · 617-638-5127
    • David M Greer, MD MA · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    • David Fischer, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino
    Rio de Janeiro, 22281-100, Brazil
    • Pedro Kurtz, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Rodrigo Serafim, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital
    São Paulo, 05652-900, Brazil
    • Gisele Sampaio-Silva, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Hospital das Clinicas Faculdade de Medicina Ribeirao Preto
    São Paulo, 14015-010, Brazil
    • Octavio Pontes-Neto, MD · Principal investigator
    • Millene Camilo, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03261089
Lead sponsor
Boston Medical Center
Collaborators
University of Florida, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto (FMRP-USP), University of Sao Paulo General Hospital, Yale University, University of Pennsylvania, University of California, San Francisco, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2017
Start date
Aug 2, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 24, 2025

Study contacts

David M Greer, MD MA
Contact
dgreer@bu.edu
(617) 638-5102
Rebecca Stafford, BA
Contact
Rebecca.Stafford@bmc.org
617-414-2422
David M Greer, MD MA
principal investigator · Boston Medical Center, Neurology
Gisele Sampaio-Silva, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Neurology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion