A Phase 1 interventional study of Prophylactic ASM and Hypothermic in Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Cardiac Arrest (CA), sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.
Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care.
Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of poor outcome. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy caused by global cerebral hypoxia during cardiac arrest is a key contributor to long-term disability, and even survivors often experience substantial functional impairment, placing a significant burden on families and society. Targeted temperature management (TTM) has long been regarded as a cornerstone neuroprotective strategy; however, TTM and TTM2 trials reported no significant neurological difference between lower and higher temperature targets. However, these studies predominantly enrolled patients with relatively mild illness severity, and multiple real-world observational cohorts suggest that, among more severely ill resuscitated patients, lower target temperatures may still confer benefit. Consequently, the optimal temperature strategy in higher-risk subgroups remains uncertain. Seizures are another common manifestation of brain injury after cardiac arrest, occurring in approximately 20-30% of resuscitated patients and contributing to secondary neurological damage. Earlier trials evaluating prophylactic anti-seizure medication (ASM) (thiopental or diazepam/magnesium) did not demonstrate neurological benefit; however, these studies primarily focused on neuroprotection rather than seizure prevention, leaving a substantial evidence gap. Patients with moderate to severe disease severity-those at the highest risk of both cerebral injury and seizure occurrence-have never been specifically studied to determine whether personalized temperature selection or early short-term prophylactic ASM (e.g., valproic acid or levetiracetam) may provide clinical benefit. Accordingly, identifying the most appropriate temperature target for higher-risk patients and determining whether short-term prophylactic antiepileptic therapy can reduce seizure-related injury represent important unresolved questions in post-resuscitation care. The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether, among comatose patients with moderate to severe risk after ROSC, specific TTM temperature strategies combined with early short-term prophylactic ASM can reduce postresuscitation seizure incidence and improve neurological outcomes. By addressing a population underrepresented in prior clinical trials-those at highest risk and most likely to benefit-this study aims to generate clinically meaningful evidence to guide temperature selection and prophylactic ASM after cardiac arrest. Evaluating these interventions in combination may provide a more comprehensive understanding of whether they reduce seizure burden, mitigate brain injury, and improve functional recovery.
926 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 226 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.
Browse Heart Arrest studies →National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,615 studies on the registry; 576 are open to participants now.
Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
hypothermia + Prophylactic treatment
Drug: Prophylactic ASM · Procedure: Hypothermic
Normothermic + Prophylactic treatment
Drug: Prophylactic ASM · Procedure: Normothermic
hypothermia + as needed
Procedure: Hypothermic · Drug: ASM as needed
Normothermic + as needed
Procedure: Normothermic · Drug: ASM as needed
Prophylactic treatment
TTM 33-34℃
TTM 36-37.5℃
as needed
clinical & electrical seizure occurrence
Time frame: Within 7 days after ROSC
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Taiwan University Hospital →