ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03260569Updated Apr 30, 2025Results posted

Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Brain Injury

A Phase 3 interventional study of Inhaled Nitric Oxide and Placebo in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-30.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 907 studies in Brain Injuries, Traumatic with a site in United States — 210 open to participants now, 247 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Brain Injuries, Traumatic · United States.

Enrollment
538th of 648
13 · median 50
Started
2018
with 50 others
Phase 3
26 of 907
2 open now
Registered
449th of 907
by date

Among the 907 studies in Brain Injuries, Traumatic with a site in United States, this one is the 538th largest by enrollment of the 648 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 51 that started in 2018, is one of 26 in phase 3, and was the 449th registered.

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Open to participants now

210 of the 907 studies in Brain Injuries, Traumatic with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

205 more — sign in →

All 210 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 281 Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies recruiting now, 120 (43%) set no upper age limit and 119 (42%) stop at 75 or younger; 40 take children under 18; 52 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 907 studies in Brain Injuries, Traumatic with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will evaluate the changes in respiratory mechanics following traumatic brain injury and determine the effect of inhaled nitric oxide on gas exchange.

Read the detailed description

Intubation and mechanical ventilation are common treatments in the care of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Intubation allows for airway control and facilitates removal of respiratory secretions. Mechanical ventilation allows control of arterial carbon dioxide to aid in control of intracranial pressure. Recent evidence suggests that lung protective ventilation (tidal volumes of 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight and moderate positive end expiratory pressure) improves outcomes following brain injury and reduces brain-lung cross talk.

The treatment of respiratory failure in TBI must balance the need to improve lung function with the negative consequences of increased intrathoracic pressure on mean arterial pressure, intracranial pressure and venous return. Traditional treatment of increasing positive end expiratory (PEEP) and mean airway pressure then, represent competing interests. Methods for improving arterial oxygenation while avoiding negative hemodynamic effects are needed.

The impact of head injury on respiratory mechanics has been studied in just a few clinical investigations. (1-3) Of note, the earliest of these noted that the ventilation perfusion (V/Q) matching following TBI was not the result of lung collapse or parenchymal lung disease but secondary to alterations in perfusion. There are three possibilities for this finding:

  1. redistribution in regional perfusion, which is partially mediated by the hypothalamus
  2. pulmonary microembolism, leading to increased dead space
  3. lung surfactant depletion due to excessive sympathetic stimulation and hyperventilation.

The introduction of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators such as inhaled nitric oxide or aerosolized epoprostenol offer an opportunity to improve oxygenation in patients with TBI without increasing airway pressures in the face of V/Q inequalities.

This study will evaluate the changes in respiratory mechanics following TBI and determine the effect of inhaled nitric oxide on gas exchange.

03

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Inhaled nitric oxide
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospital admission with traumatic brain injury (penetrating or blunt)
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • Glasgow Coma Score > 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain death
  • Expected survival \< 48 hours
  • Air leak (bronchopleural fistula, tracheal injury)
  • Current inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) > 0.65
  • Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mm Hg, cardiac arrhythmia)
  • Uncontrolled intracranial pressure (> 20 mm Hg)
  • Spinal cord injury with hypotension
  • Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (PaO2/FiO2 \< 100)
  • Chest abbreviated injury score (AIS) > 3
  • First rib fracture
  • Flail chest
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Inhaled Nitric Oxide

    Inhaled nitric oxide at 20 parts per million, administered once during first 36 hours following admission

    Drug: Inhaled Nitric Oxide

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Nitrogen only, administered once during first 36 hours following admission

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Patients randomized to this arm will receive inhaled nitric oxide 20 parts per million.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Nitrogen plus oxygen

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PaO2

    The primary endpoint is the difference in PO2

    Time frame: at Day 3 of the study

07

Results

Posted Apr 30, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestonein Haled Nitric OxidePlacebo
Started67
Completed67
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPaO2

The primary endpoint is the difference in PO2

Time frame:
at Day 3 of the study
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
PaO2
mmHgInhaled Nitric OxidePlacebo
PaO2115 ± 1095 ± 10
Statistical analysis
  • Inhaled Nitric Oxide vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Inhaled Nitric Oxide3/6 (50%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Placebo2/7 (28.6%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Inhaled Nitric OxidePlaceboTotal
Mean63 ± 1749 ± 2053 ± 18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Inhaled Nitric OxidePlaceboTotal
Female145
Male538
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Inhaled Nitric OxidePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White5712
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Inhaled Nitric OxidePlaceboTotal
United States6713
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Schumacker PT, Rhodes GR, Newell JC, Dutton RE, Shah DM, Scovill WA, Powers SR. Ventilation-perfusion imbalance after head trauma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Jan;119(1):33-43. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.119.1.33. PubMed 420436 ↗
  • Cooper KR, Boswell PA. Accurate measurement of functional residual capacity and oxygen consumption of patients on mechanical ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1983 May;11(2):151-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8301100212. PubMed 6346942 ↗
  • Koutsoukou A, Perraki H, Raftopoulou A, Koulouris N, Sotiropoulou C, Kotanidou A, Orfanos S, Roussos C. Respiratory mechanics in brain-damaged patients. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Dec;32(12):1947-54. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0406-0. Epub 2006 Oct 20. PubMed 17053881 ↗
  • Gruber A, Reinprecht A, Illievich UM, Fitzgerald R, Dietrich W, Czech T, Richling B. Extracerebral organ dysfunction and neurologic outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):505-14. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00026. PubMed 10199529 ↗
  • Holland MC, Mackersie RC, Morabito D, Campbell AR, Kivett VA, Patel R, Erickson VR, Pittet JF. The development of acute lung injury is associated with worse neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):106-11. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000071620.27375.BE. PubMed 12855888 ↗
  • Pelosi P, Severgnini P, Chiaranda M. An integrated approach to prevent and treat respiratory failure in brain-injured patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Feb;11(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200502000-00006. PubMed 15659943 ↗
  • Garry PS, Ezra M, Rowland MJ, Westbrook J, Pattinson KT. The role of the nitric oxide pathway in brain injury and its treatment--from bench to bedside. Exp Neurol. 2015 Jan;263:235-43. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed 25447937 ↗
  • Terpolilli NA, Kim SW, Thal SC, Kuebler WM, Plesnila N. Inhaled nitric oxide reduces secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013 Feb;33(2):311-8. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.176. Epub 2012 Nov 28. PubMed 23188422 ↗
  • Papadimos TJ, Medhkour A, Yermal S. Successful use of inhaled nitric oxide to decrease intracranial pressure in a patient with severe traumatic brain injury complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome: a role for an anti-inflammatory mechanism? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Feb 17;17:5. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-5. PubMed 19222848 ↗
  • Papadimos TJ. The beneficial effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with severe traumatic brain injury complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome: a hypothesis. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2008 Jan 14;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-2-1. PubMed 18272001 ↗
  • Vavilala MS, Roberts JS, Moore AE, Newell DW, Lam AM. The influence of inhaled nitric oxide on cerebral blood flow and metabolism in a child with traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):351-3 , 3rd contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00023. PubMed 11473859 ↗
  • Dellinger RP, Zimmerman JL, Taylor RW, Straube RC, Hauser DL, Criner GJ, Davis K Jr, Hyers TM, Papadakos P. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00011. PubMed 9428538 ↗
  • Lundin S, Mang H, Smithies M, Stenqvist O, Frostell C. Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: results of a European multicentre study. The European Study Group of Inhaled Nitric Oxide. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):911-9. doi: 10.1007/s001340050982. PubMed 10501745 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 60 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2025, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

Of 30 phase 3 interventional studies under Brain Injuries, Traumatic, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 69. This study's 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2017
First posted
Aug 24, 2017
StartActual
Dec 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 28, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 28, 2023
Results first posted
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Apr 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03260569
Responsible party
Michael Goodman (Instructor, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2017
Start date
Dec 12, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2023
Completion
Dec 28, 2023
Results posted
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Apr 30, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nitric Oxide

Start the discussion