ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07875777Updated Oct 15, 2026

Self-administered Acupressure in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

An interventional study of Verum Acupressure (using AcuWand) and Sham Acupressure (using AcuWand) in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 15, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed research is to determine the clinical efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of acupressure analgesia in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).

Read the detailed description

This study will help the investigators learn whether acupressure, a non-pharmacological alternative treatment approach, can help manage pain in patients with sickle cell disease. Acupressure involves the application of pressure stimulation at specific acupoints on the body. Acupressure may help relieve pain and is used for a wide variety of pain conditions. Participation in this study will consist of remote self-administered treatment every other day over 5 weeks, followed by 6 months of remote follow-up visits. During participation, subjects will: 1) receive detailed instruction on locating treatment acupoints and completing study procedures remotely, 2) be assigned a treatment kit, 3) answer questions about their personal and health-related information for assessing their health condition before, during, and after the treatment during follow-up sessions, and 4) collect inner eyelid images for examining the hemoglobin level on a weekly basis at steady phase and daily basis during acute vaso-occlusive crisis stage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

Keywords

  • Sickle Cell Disease
  • Pain
  • Acupressure
  • Inner Eyelid Imaging
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,125 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 239 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 40 across 762 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 324 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Any gender

18-80 (Adults) years old

Have been diagnosed with SCD and experiencing chronic pain in the past 6 months

Either outpatient or inpatient or status changing between each other

Willing to limit the current and the introduction of any new medications or treatment modalities for control of pain symptoms during the study visits

Willing to stick to the scheduled acupressure treatments every other day for 5 weeks

Fluent in English and capable of giving written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Recent/ongoing alternative pain management with acupuncture/acupressure or acupuncture/acupressure-related techniques within the last 6 months

Presence of a concurrent autoimmune or inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, etc. that causes pain or any other chronic pain condition with pain greater than sickle pain

Diseases/conditions history includes but not limited to:

Head injury with substantial loss of consciousness Known non-SCD-related severe psychiatric illnesses (e.g. current schizophrenia, major depression with suicidal ideation) Significant visual, motor, or auditory impairment that would interfere with ability to perform study visits-related activities

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Usual Care + Verum Acupressure

    Participants will continue ongoing usual care and administer self-acupressure treatment.

    Device: Verum Acupressure (using AcuWand)

  • Sham comparator
    Usual Care + Sham Acupressure

    Participants will continue ongoing usual care and administer self-acupressure treatment.

    Device: Sham Acupressure (using AcuWand)

  • No intervention
    Usual Care Only

Interventions

  • DeviceVerum Acupressure (using AcuWand)

    The acupressure procedure will consist of medium-deep pressure using a tool (AcuWand) to the selected acupoints on their bodies, as tolerated, at each assigned point, applied in a circular motion. Subjects will be trained to perform the treatment appropriately at all points and will complete the first treatment under supervision. Acupressure treatment will last for 3 minutes per point and be administered remotely every other day for 5 weeks.

  • DeviceSham Acupressure (using AcuWand)

    The sham acupressure procedure will be performed using the same tool and methodology at each assigned sham acupoint. Subjects will be trained to perform the treatment appropriately at all points and will complete the first treatment under supervision. Treatment will be administered remotely every other day for 5 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity

    Intensity of pain will be assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement using the rating from 0= no pain to 10= worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  2. Change in Pain Interference

    Pain interference will be assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Questionnaire using raw scores (rating from with 4 = minimal interference to 20 = significant interference) and T scores (ranges from approximately 41 to 75, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, based on the US general population. A higher score indicates greater pain interference.)

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Nociplastic Pain Questionnaire

    A customized questionnaire that is used to examine the locations (Yes/No) and severity of the pain interference (no problem-slight-moderate-severe) for understanding the level of nociplastic pain in the past 7 days. Widespread Pain Index will be scored from 0-19, and Symptom Severity will be scored from 0 to 12. Higher score connotes higher severity of nociplastic pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  2. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Questionnaire

    Physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance will be assessed by PROMIS-29, a single 4-20 numeric rating for each measure. Standard T scores relative to the U.S. general population (mean = 50, SD = 10) are calculated; higher values for each measure indicate worse symptoms except for higher physical function values which indicate better physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  3. Change in Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Questionnaire

    MFI is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue with five dimensions including General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, Reduced Motivation and Reduced Activity. Subscale scores (range 4-20) are calculated as the sum of item ratings and a total fatigue score (range 20-100) is calculated as the sum of subscale scores. Higher scores indicate a higher level of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  4. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Questionnaire

    The PSQI is a 19-item, self-rated questionnaire designed to measure sleep quality and disturbance over the past month in clinical populations. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  5. Change in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL, adult version) Questionnaire

    The PedsQL is a self-report and parent-report measure assessing the quality of life in a variety of domains including physical, emotional, social, and school. Items are reverse-scored and transformed to a 0-100 scale where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-week 5 treatment

  6. Change in opioid requirements

    Opioid requirements will be assessed by morphine milligram equivalents.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Blood Hemoglobin Level

    Blood hemoglobin level will be assessed using self-collected images of the participants' inner eyelid via a patented algorithm of spectral super-resolution spectroscopy technique.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly through Week 5, and daily during VOCs up to 12 months

  2. Changes in vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) frequency

    The total number of VOCs within 12 months before and after the 5-week treatment will be documented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of California, Irvine
    Irvine, California 92697, United States
    • Zahra Pakbaz, MD · Contact · zpakbaz@hs.uci.edu · 714-456-5153
    • Richard E Harris, PhD · Principal investigator
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
    • Ying Wang, MD, PhD · Contact · ywanglab@ucmail.uc.edu · 513-653-0746
    • Ying Wang, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Houran L, Pucka AQ, Jiang M, Liu Z, O'Brien ARW, Harte SE, Harris RE, Pakbaz Z, Wang Y. Acupressure alleviates pain and clinical symptoms in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2025 Dec 9;9(23):6126-6129. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016995. No abstract available. PubMed 40902081 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2027; primary completion for Sep 2032, 59 months later.

Of 164 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anemia, Sickle Cell, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 49.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2032
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2033
Last update
Oct 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07875777
Responsible party
Ying Wang (Associate Professor, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion